- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:08 pm to Nguyener
quote:
Usually it's a racial slur, some kind of psychotic rant, or in this thread more than likely a graphic picture of a dead baby.
This is something that the aborto-centrist fanatics detest when they encounter pro-life demonstrators. When they're faced to acknowledge the inherent humanity of aborted remains, it undermines their decades-old "clump of cells" argument.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:08 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
The state didn't put the baby in the woman.
In a sense it did,
You read it here folks!
This is the monumental intellect we're dealing with that is BamaAtl!
:rotflmao: NOW, me not letting you kill your baby places responsibility upon me for the fact YOU put it in there in the first fricking place!!
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:08 pm to BamaAtl
quote:But only one is murdered.
Then it has bodily autonomy
As does the pregnant woman.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:08 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
In a sense it did, by not properly equipping her with the knowledge and tools to prevent pregnancy
Holy shite dude. Where in America is there a woman who doesn't understand how to properly prevent pregnancy? Seriously. Link me to where that exists. Birth control is available everywhere from Walgreens to grocery stores to gas stations to free clinics.
Or you could just not have sex.
Or you could ask your doctor about one of the hundred birth control devices constantly on commercials all over TV.
quote:
not properly allowing for a situation in which raising a child would be beneficial.
So you believe that it is the state's job to ensure that every single citizen in the entire United States at any point in time has the ability to beneficially raise a child in an ideal situation?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:09 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Why are you treating a fetus as simply part of a woman’s body?
Because until a certain point the fetus cannot survive without the woman's body. What would you call that scenario?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:09 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
That's a different question then where the cutoff for safe and legal abortions should be.
So you are tacitly acknowledging that you inherently know that the life cycle of humans begins at conception by dodging the question, otherwise you would have a logical explanation. That acknowledgment then leads to your argument of when it is "safe" - for who? Not for the baby (which you acknowledge is a baby remember?).
For the mother? Ok great. She gets to decide when the life cycle of the fetus inside her ends? Why? Who gives her that right? It isn't the constitution, because the constitution protects the right to life, which you have, in this thread, acknowledged exists within the mother.
Do you know what they call the action of ending someone else's life cycle against their will? I bet you know.
Debate the legality of it all you want, however I would advise you to look into the myriad of things that used to be "legal" in this country and consider them before using the "it's legal" shield.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:09 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Yep.
As does the pregnant woman.
We all have it.
That's why the state won't let one of us kill another to save ourselves.
Thanks for playing.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:09 pm to BamaAtl
Your analogy is the most intellectually dishonest thing I have ever seen.
Do you view laws against murder as an infringement on somebody’s bodily autonomy?
It restricts the right of somebody to do something to someone else.
Do you view laws against murder as an infringement on somebody’s bodily autonomy?
It restricts the right of somebody to do something to someone else.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:09 pm to Jbird
quote:
But only one is murdered.
And the most innocent of the two at that.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:09 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
I'm willing to bet you'd die on the hill for the 3rd trimester abortion on demand laws
Provided we make exceptions for rape/incest/mother's health/incompatibility with life I have no problem with third-trimester bans.
But because I'm not some Christian militant ready to kill me some abortion providers, on this board I'm a radical.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:09 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
BamaAtl
So are you actually a doctor? If you are which school did you go to? I want to make sure I never have a doctor that went to the same school as you.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:10 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Motherhood
Because until a certain point the fetus cannot survive without the woman's body. What would you call that scenario?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:10 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Another person who doesn't know what "viable" means in this context!
Define it.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:10 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
In a sense it did, by not properly equipping her with the knowledge and tools to prevent pregnancy and not properly allowing for a situation in which raising a child would be beneficial.
And we finally get to the meat and potatoes of it. You don't like being responsible for their mistakes and like to blame others. Thanks for that beautiful response.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:10 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Awww, the little coward thinks she's cute. Keep saying it, doesn't help your case, baby killer
You'd do better learning what it means instead of trying to get it through osmosis, little buddy!
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:10 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
but stupid people often let pride prevent them from just acknowledging "whoops".
Yeah, who would misinterpret an analogy for 20 pages then later claim it was intentional...oh..you?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:11 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Well shite
Provided we make exceptions for rape/incest/mother's health/incompatibility with life I have no problem with third-trimester bans.
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:11 pm to civiltiger07
She’s not going to answer
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:11 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
rape/incest/mother's health/incompatibility with life
what the frick is "incompatibility with life"?
You continue to prove that you are a piece of shite
Page 39 of 52
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News