- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When a lib says Trump inherited a hot economy.
Posted on 11/22/18 at 1:10 am to Seldom Seen
Posted on 11/22/18 at 1:10 am to Seldom Seen
Ah, yes. Because Donald Trump has never told a lie in his life...
Posted on 11/22/18 at 1:11 am to NC_Tigah
I'm sure you could have done better.
Posted on 11/22/18 at 1:12 am to indianswim
He was talking about Coal jobs... in which he was right...
Posted on 11/22/18 at 1:16 am to Dead End
That shite doesn't even fricking matter. It's like you never even heard of The Southern Strategy. A SOURCE THAT PROVES YOU WRONG
It's not like you'll even read it. You'll just automatically respond with "fake news" and ignore anything that goes against what you want to hear.
It's not like you'll even read it. You'll just automatically respond with "fake news" and ignore anything that goes against what you want to hear.
Posted on 11/22/18 at 1:24 am to KeyserSoze999
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/22/18 at 1:37 am
Posted on 11/22/18 at 1:51 am to KeyserSoze999
The fricking idiots were talking about "new normal" which = mediocre shite when obama was president.
I swear, they think we don't have the internet or something.
I swear, they think we don't have the internet or something.
Posted on 11/22/18 at 5:49 am to gthog61
quote:
The fricking idiots were talking about "new normal" which = mediocre shite when obama was president. I swear, they think we don't have the internet or something....
My goodness....you are the biggest idiot on this board....
Posted on 11/22/18 at 5:52 am to WillieNelsonsDoobie
quote:Wait! You're saying there was no discussion of "the new normal"?quote:My goodness....you are the biggest idiot on this board....
The fricking idiots were talking about "new normal"
Posted on 11/22/18 at 6:03 am to KeyserSoze999
Liberals follow the Obama doctrine
"you didn't build that"
"you didn't build that"
Posted on 11/22/18 at 6:05 am to bfniii
quote:
you mean restate what's plainly evident in the articles? stupid
no, none of that is "evident" in the articles. most of them are just stories covering a single revision.
how many of them even allege a systematic pattern of revisions in the agencies? how many of those allege that this pattern of revision was intentional? how many of those allege that this intention was to shape perception of obama? these were your allegations.
and don't weasel out by talking about what releases the WH touted. that isn't the same thing at all, as you've hopefully learned by now.
quote:
read. the. freaking. articles. nerd
i read them when you linked them, and have reviewed them since. and for the millionth time, they fail to support you. you're too lazy/scared to clarify exactly how they do.
quote:
oh yeah? how so?
i guess i'll repeat myself, again, by saying that most of them are just instances of single revisions, in a sea of hundreds, and that they fail to support or argue for a consistent pattern that is different from the whole. let alone that this new pattern is intentional. let alone that that intention is for obama's benefit.
(i wonder how many times i've had to say that now.)
quote:
i am the one reminding you that you won't even do a simple thing such as quote the articles and show how they're wrong.
here's another dozenth-or-so repeat: i didn't say they are "wrong". i said they fail to support your argument.
quote:
when did i do this? link?
you asserted that the dynamics of both the labor force participation rate and net job loss had turned around in this very thread
and right here, you responded to bmy's claim that was explicitly about real wages with 5 blind links, every single one of which talks about nominal wages!
Posted on 11/22/18 at 6:40 am to bamafan1001
quote:
It wasnt dogshit but was not good
You can’t be serious...
Posted on 11/22/18 at 7:09 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:Statistics are what they are.
how many of them even allege a systematic pattern of revisions in the agencies?
I'm sure there are reasons for what IIRC were fairly consistent initial overestimates f/u'd by subsequent downward revisions though.
MSM reporting patterns also modulated and amplified those reports. I don't think a single MSM news source ever reported downward revisions, even after they lauded Obama as he touted what were (again IIRC) consistently over stated initial performance stats. The obamanomics PR triad, (1) initial over-estimated growth and economic performance, (2) a fawning press, (3) Obama's self-congratulatory flaunting of ghost numbers negatively influence perceptions of those of us who were already dubious about the man.
No question.
OTOH, to claim, as many do, that obamanomics was anything but eight years of tepid, anemic, growth propped up by the Fed, is a fool's errand.
quote:There is an ridiculous tendency, often by those Obama followers who are not particularly economically savvy, to start Obama's comparative numbers at the 3/09 market nadir. Of course beginning any comparison at peak or nadir will spark differentials. However, doing so assumes all subsequent economic performance and thus the differential results directly from those currently in charge. In Obama's case, such assumptions must include the premise that 3/2009 was a steady-state, and would have continued had it not been for Obama.
bmy's claim that was explicitly about real wages
You and I both know that is absolute crap.
You and I both know Obama simply allowed W's economic measures to continue unabated. In fact he did little else any serious economist would claim added to the recovery. The stimulus was a huge boondoggle. He did bailout GM. But in reality Obama piggybacked on TARP, the Bush Tax Cuts and ran his mouth.
Posted on 11/22/18 at 7:32 am to ohiovol
quote:
Considering the economy was dog shite
quote:
It was when Obama inherited it.
Honest question...
Do you know what policies passed by our government led to the financial meltdown in 2007?
Second Question...
Who passed those policies.
3rd Question
Who fought to correct those policies before the crisis and who fought to keep them in place.
4th Question When the crisis happened who immediately blamed someone else for the policies they wanted, fought for, and fought to keep, after their policies turned to shite, like their opponents told them they would.
Be prepared to have your whole world view upended when you research the answers to those questions.
This post was edited on 11/22/18 at 7:35 am
Posted on 11/22/18 at 7:38 am to KeyserSoze999
Considering that the stock market is at 0% growth for the entire year of 2018, I’d be careful about bragging too much about the current situation.
Posted on 11/22/18 at 7:43 am to TBoy
quote:
Considering that the stock market is at 0% growth for the entire year of 2018, I’d be careful about bragging too much about the current situation.
Why would you care about that. Everyone knows that you poor people don't own stock.
Posted on 11/22/18 at 8:30 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
for what IIRC were fairly consistent initial overestimates
maybe what you are recalling is someone's narrative.
quote:
MSM reporting patterns also modulated and amplified those reports.
wholly irrelevant to bfniii's theory about the actual statistical agencies. presidential administrations have always touted numbers when favorable and downplayed when not. as do the cheerleaders for respective sides on this board.
quote:
In Obama's case, such assumptions must include the premise that 3/2009 was a steady-state, and would have continued had it not been for Obama.
You and I both know that is absolute crap.
you ain't wrong. now, when trumpkins make the same implication about late 2015/16, even though we were suffering from a huge dip in oil/gas investment + an international slowdown + the beginning of rate hikes, & the resulting subsequent domestic growth slowdown, and no one makes this point when we compare the last several quarters under obama to the first ones of trump. but those 2015/16 quarters aren't the steady state or long-run eq either.
i'll also note that i haven't heard a peep about the expectations for q4's growth here, especially considering the endless "mission accomplisheds" over q2 and q3
quote:
In fact he did little else any serious economist would claim added to the recovery. The stimulus was a huge boondoggle
more than 1/3 of it was tax cuts, although i think it's clear that tarp was way more important. but government spending by definition increases gdp, and it was deficit-financed, so you can't really say "it didn't add to the recovery." would you please stop it with trying to sound authoritative about what a "serious economist" would say?
Posted on 11/22/18 at 9:18 am to KeyserSoze999
The economy was on an upswing from mid 2010 through 2016. I wouldn't call it "hot", but it was nice and "warm".
Posted on 11/22/18 at 9:22 am to BigAppleBucky
quote:
The economy was on an upswing from mid 2010 through 2016
Posted on 11/22/18 at 9:25 am to TBoy
quote:
Considering that the stock market is at 0% growth for the entire year of 2018, I’d be careful about bragging too much about the current situation.
Holy shite
Posted on 11/22/18 at 10:11 am to KeyserSoze999
do they have any credibility????
keyser: Do you read????? how hot is economy today????
keyser: Do you read????? how hot is economy today????
Popular
Back to top


0





