- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What's up with this cancer diagnosis? I refuse to believe the WH doctors failed to find it
Posted on 5/19/25 at 5:21 am to ChineseBandit58
Posted on 5/19/25 at 5:21 am to ChineseBandit58
Yep this is a weird one if the truth. Zero chance he hasn’t had bloodwork done that includes a psa at a minimum of yearly and no way this happens this quickly. Since age 48 I have had my psa done every 6 mos. Have had 2 biopsies in 3 years. I’m not President with a personal doc.
Cover up much.
Cover up much.
0
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:03 am to ItzMe1972
You can have a carcinoma that will not show an increase of PSA circulating in the blood. Although, it is a good indicator, it should be combined with the dreaded finger probe, to test for nodules or fixation. The good news is that there is currently a proposed test that can use the elements found in a saliva sample to test for prostate carcinoma, and will likely also be found in urine, making it much easier to diagnose.
I agree, if Biden already has bone mets, someone has missed some steps in the required yearly medical evaluation of the president. I for one, find it hard to believe, that a digital rectal exam was not performed on the most important man in the world, at his age. They were too busy trying to make sure they DIDN'T find anything that might keep him out of the WH, that they basically committed medical malpractice.
I agree, if Biden already has bone mets, someone has missed some steps in the required yearly medical evaluation of the president. I for one, find it hard to believe, that a digital rectal exam was not performed on the most important man in the world, at his age. They were too busy trying to make sure they DIDN'T find anything that might keep him out of the WH, that they basically committed medical malpractice.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:04 am to ChineseBandit58
From experience, none of this is out of the blue. PSA’s are checked in men as we age. Meds, scans, biopsies are part of it.
The press release said Biden had “increasing symptoms” which indicates he has had symptoms relating to the prostrate for a period of time.
The press release said Biden had “increasing symptoms” which indicates he has had symptoms relating to the prostrate for a period of time.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:14 am to Keltic Tiger
quote:
how honest was his medical exam report?
Exactly as honest as anything else that came out of that Whitehouse.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:17 am to ChineseBandit58
PSA is not the cure all. It can be FALSELY lowered by a thousand "fake cures". Which means you can take xyz and your PSA is lowered BUT it doesn't reflect what is happening in your prostate. The cancer can be still eating you up and you;ve lowered your PSA by chewing on Peruvian cat tails.
AND some prostate cancers do not affect PSA.
AND some prostate cancers do not affect PSA.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:18 am to DocYatesVA
quote:Indeed. Rare but it is possible.
You can have a carcinoma that will not show an increase of PSA circulating in the blood.
However, in this case we're told Biden's prostate cancer is a hormone-sensitive variety. PSA should have picked that up eight ways to Sunday.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:23 am to jeffsdad
quote:Correct, up to 20% minimally affect PSA. That's not really pertinent in this instance.
AND some prostate cancers do not affect PSA.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:28 am to ChineseBandit58
I agree with you, but if Trump was diagnosed with prostate cancer right now it makes sense that he would try to keep it under wraps and just deal with it.
I don’t think the prostate cancer is that big of a deal, except insofar as it might have been causing the dementia.
Franklin Roosevelt similarly kept his health problems under wraps. I’m sure other Presidents have. Short of a law mandating full disclosure I doubt we’ll ever hear of a President’s malady unless its not material.
I don’t think the prostate cancer is that big of a deal, except insofar as it might have been causing the dementia.
Franklin Roosevelt similarly kept his health problems under wraps. I’m sure other Presidents have. Short of a law mandating full disclosure I doubt we’ll ever hear of a President’s malady unless its not material.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:36 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
What's up with this cancer diagnosis? I refuse to believe the WH doctors failed to find it
That idiot Axelrod gave it away. To come out as quickly as he did and basically say, "He's dying. Leave him alone," should tell everybody why this is being released now.
Also, don't forget that President Trump just had a GREAT WEEK. Guess who doesn't have to talk about that now?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:39 am to NC_Tigah
just PSA (public service announcement for PSA
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 6:40 am
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:42 am to KCT
quote:
That idiot Axelrod gave it away. To come out as quickly as he did and basically say, "He's dying. Leave him alone," should tell everybody why this is being released now.
Also, don't forget that President Trump just had a GREAT WEEK. Guess who doesn't have to talk about that now?
This ^^
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:44 am to NC_Tigah
That’s a fair point, but even if only 20% of prostate cancers have minimal impact on PSA, it’s still worth keeping in mind—especially when PSA levels don’t match other symptoms or findings. Ignoring that possibility could lead to missed or delayed diagnoses.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:54 am to Penrod
quote:The dementia issue was recognizable 6-7 yrs ago. I'd guess, life expectancy with an untreated Gleason 9 Cancer would be 2-5 yrs.
I don’t think the prostate cancer is that big of a deal, except insofar as it might have been causing the dementia.
Perhaps Biden suffers from a 'prostrate' brain malignancy as well though?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:05 am to ChineseBandit58
They were hiding the cancer diagnosis
Then when the Hur tapes were released Jill released the diagnosis for sympathy
No doubt
Then when the Hur tapes were released Jill released the diagnosis for sympathy
No doubt
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:09 am to ChineseBandit58
He said he had cancer back in 2022. But of course they told us he didn't actually mean what he said
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:09 am to threeputt23
quote:
The timing of this is very suspect. It seems that so many books are coming out about his dementia just recently.
It's an attempt to deflect attention from the biggest, or one of the biggest political frauds, ever perpetrated in human history.
I'm not sure which is biggest, an entire party and it's propagandist wing in the media hiding the president's dementia from the people, or stealing the 2020 election.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:21 am to ChineseBandit58
Biden has been dead.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:46 am to ChineseBandit58
Now I start to wonder if the reason they hid the diagnosis was because they were pumping sleepy joe up with Testosterone so he would be non comatose……
Testosterone on prostate chance is like gasoline on a fire.
The timing indicates a cover up but it may be more sinister
Testosterone on prostate chance is like gasoline on a fire.
The timing indicates a cover up but it may be more sinister
Posted on 5/19/25 at 11:27 am to ChineseBandit58
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:38 pm to NC_Tigah
Yes, IF it was checked, and I cannot believe it wasn't, which is why I much more likely to believe this was a coverup than malpractice.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News