re: What was the reasoning behind the flooding of multiple countries with "migrants"

The goal is elimination of Christianity. Christianity tends to be the dominant religion in white countries.

The west is the only place where freedom exists in pockets. Asia, Africa are predominantly subserviently masses akin to peasantry.

As log as pockets of freedom exist, globalist cannot be globalist.

Remember the flooding only took place in Western Countries. Tucker Carlson was right!

Look up color revolution….
Yes, purposeful, to destabilize, end western culture, overwhelm voting, which all leads to a one world government…
The first step of a color rec is to take over judicial system…so that when conflict happens , it ends up in front of a corrupt judge….this began years ago..and what you are seeing with these rogue judges currently was the plan all along…
You’re likely to see Trump activate the military to deal with elections and judges…which is above the constitution..

quote:

---

These migrants have no desire to assimilate,

---

Assimilation is not so much a matter of desire as it is a matter of numbers. If 100 Nigerians land in Lake Charles, La. they are going to want to learn English and mix into the culture. If 5,000 Nigerians land in Lake Charles they are going to gravitate to the same neighborhoods and communicate with their fellow Africans, making it harder to learn English and adopt American culture.

Well now that I've found it, "Return of the Strong Gods" by RR Reno is a good summary of my belief here. I'd been toying with these concepts for years (the void of hard ideas being filled with other but worse hard ideas and bad soft ideas), but somehow didn't find this book until a few months ago. It's a breath of fresh air in explaining the concepts a lot of us probably had but couldn't articulate well.

In short, following the world wars and millions in lives lost and countries destroyed, there was an inclination toward tearing down structures that led to those conflicts. Religion, ethnic pride, national pride, racial identity, etc. What followed was decades of replacing those "strong gods" with weaker ones - multiculturalism, tolerance, open borders, open societies. Initially, that's an understandable reaction.

Now that answers, IMO, the initial 20-40 years, but not what we've seen in the last 20 or so. And my belief on that is that those "replacements" took on near-religious importance to the non-traditionalists because of the vacuum created by the lack of actual religion, strong families, institutions, etc. In my view, the weak gods actually became pretty strong due to the consolidation of power, and those who rose to power/authority/wealth during the prevail of the "weak gods" are very incentivized to keep the system as it is.

I think that's the best explanation for why otherwise stodgy white EU politicians are favoring mass migration in otherwise inexplicable fashion. First, it's all they know, it's been their guiding star for decades. Second, it's the status quo, and the one that has enabled their comfort/wealth/etc.

Islam, I think is a separate matter, but it's thrived in Europe under the same circumstances. A group that practices Islam vs. a group that worships political correctness is no contest at all, the stronger god wins easily, and hence, Islam's success/inroads in Europe.

quote:

---

More migrants means more poor people which means more need for government aid. The whole goal is yo move the money from you to the government, ultimately culminating in Communism.

---

Lowering the white population was part of the agenda. The easiest way to do that is to insure white people don’t want families and drive a wedge between white men and women.