- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What really disturbing about the assassination of Charlie Kirk
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:46 am to Darth_Vader
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:46 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Is the reaction of many people celebrating it.
Evil celebrate evil. We are in a battle of good and evil. It’s really that simple.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:46 am to Corinthians420
quote:
There was literally a post on the poli board last night by "BALLERFORADOLLAR" or some similar username like that claiming he had put the combat part of his life behind him when he started a family but he was ready to unleash the beast and start killing folks. Mods removed it so maybe you didnt see it.
One anecdotal piece of evidence that conveniently no longer exists. Well done.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:48 am to Klark Kent
Could pull up plenty of posts advocating civil war. Acting like it is only one guy is dishonest.
In before proximo claims they mean a "peaceful" civil war
In before proximo claims they mean a "peaceful" civil war
This post was edited on 9/12/25 at 7:49 am
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:48 am to Corinthians420
quote:
There was literally a post on the poli board last night by "BALLERFORADOLLAR" or some similar username like that claiming he had put the combat part of his life behind him when he started a family but he was ready to unleash the beast and start killing folks.
So, you’re more disturbed by one single idiot on a message board saying something stupid than millions of people openly cerebrating the political assassination of someone they disagree with?
Help me understand your logic here.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:48 am to Darth_Vader
Their hatred is really guilt.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:50 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
So, you’re more disturbed by one single idiot on a message board saying something stupid than millions of people openly cerebrating the political assassination of someone they disagree with?
Help me understand your logic here.
Threatening to kill people is more disturbing than saying something off color.
Hell just read the beheading thread yesterday on the O-T where people made jokes.
Theres a reason one post was deleted and the others weren't
This post was edited on 9/12/25 at 7:52 am
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:50 am to Corinthians420
So is pretending the Left isn’t celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination—or openly speculating about who’s next. Both faaaar more prevalent than your boogiemen.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:51 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
So, you’re more disturbed by one single idiot on a message board saying something stupid than millions of people openly cerebrating the political assassination of someone they disagree with?
Help me understand your logic here.
There is no logic. They are fueled by pure hate. They killed Kirk because of his views and values. They would kill every single person on this planet with his views if they could.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:51 am to Corinthians420
quote:
before proximo claims they mean a "peaceful" civil war
Stop upvoting yourself.
So you lied about people saying they’re going to kill innocents so now you have to pivot to people in the moment saying they’re going to fight back against the people murdering us in the street
Congrats the thread is all about you, here’s your attention
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:54 am to Proximo
quote:
you lied about people saying they’re going to kill innocents
No. One guy said he was gonna start killing folks. Other people claimed they are ready for civil war. Not difficult
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:54 am to Corinthians420
quote:
Threatening to kill people is more disturbing than saying something off color.
People openly celebrating the cold-blooded murder if someone guilty of nothing more than participating in civil discourse is “saying something off color” in your opinion? That’s what you honestly believe? It’s just “off color?”
You seriously need to log off, go sit in a quiet room and do some very real soul searching.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:55 am to Proximo
Dude loves playing TigerDroppings’ Hall Monitor….yet somehow only notices ‘violations’ when they prop up his terrible arguments.
And it all stems from butthurt. Sad.
And it all stems from butthurt. Sad.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:55 am to Darth_Vader
From Reagan in 1981 to gabby Gifford in 2011, the US enjoyed a relatively peaceful era of political assassination and violence.
There was a lot of political violence in the 60s and 70s with JFK, MLK, Malcolm X, Gerald Ford, Harvey Milk, George Wallace.
A return to political violence would be real back sliding for the US, and is doubly concerning given the weapons broadly available to the public today vs 1965.
We should all pray we don’t fall into another cycle of political violence.
LINK
There was a lot of political violence in the 60s and 70s with JFK, MLK, Malcolm X, Gerald Ford, Harvey Milk, George Wallace.
A return to political violence would be real back sliding for the US, and is doubly concerning given the weapons broadly available to the public today vs 1965.
We should all pray we don’t fall into another cycle of political violence.
LINK
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:57 am to Darth_Vader
Making threats is illegal. It is by definition more disturbing than celebrating deaths.
I dont even know how you can argue this.
I dont even know how you can argue this.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:57 am to Corinthians420
quote:Once again, this fricktard hijacks a thread to bring the focus on him.
Corinthians420
Not surprised in the slightest.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:58 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Help me understand your logic here.
Totally Not A Progressive Corinthians is incapable of logic.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:58 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:I don’t agree with this split. I think it’s 40% classic liberals (favors DNC but drifting towards RNC), 30% conservative (almost completely RNC), 25% apolitical (vote by issues if at all, favors DNC), 5% radical marxists (all DNC or fringe party). There is likely a growing extremist right wing faction but it’s still under 1%.
This country is 40% hard leftists, 20% moderate, and 40% conservative.
This post was edited on 9/12/25 at 8:01 am
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:58 am to Scruffy
I didnt bring the focus on me. I posted what I found most disturbing. Then others highjacked it and started calling out my answer as wrong rather than replying to OP
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:58 am to Corinthians420
quote:
Other people claimed they are ready for civil war.
You’re parsing your side’s statements and then breezing through everyone else’s. Dumb bitch.
Popular
Back to top


0





