- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What is Julia Letlow‘s stance on Carbon capture?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:28 am
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:28 am
I know that John Fleming has come out strongly against it but where does she stand? I grew up fishing in Lake Maurepas and I’m worried about the effects it will have in years to come. It’s one of the main reasons I voted for Fleming
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:31 am to BowDownToLSU
too late for that, we've already been sold down the river
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:32 am to BowDownToLSU
She's marrying a carbon capture lobbyist.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:32 am to BowDownToLSU
quote:
What is Julia Letlow‘s stance on Carbon capture?
Whatever Landry wants it to be.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:38 am to BowDownToLSU
A little off topic, but how does the money for the state/public work for carbon capture? I’m not asking about the pros or cons of the process, just how the revenue works. Does it work like oil and gas where the mineral rights owner gets some sort of payment? And does the state get some sort of cut for tax revenue?
What’s the financial incentive to the land/mineral rights owner as well as the state/general public? If this is forced on us, are we at least going to get a financial benefit?
What’s the financial incentive to the land/mineral rights owner as well as the state/general public? If this is forced on us, are we at least going to get a financial benefit?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:40 am to BowDownToLSU
It doesn't make a rat's arse. They are already operating inFl Louisiana.
Fleming tied himself to the loud tiny minority
Fleming tied himself to the loud tiny minority
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:44 am to WavinWilly
Landowners are paid royalties just like an oil well. IF a pipeline crosses your land it is just like any pipeline right of way
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:46 am to BowDownToLSU
Wait.
You believe campaign promises?
You believe campaign promises?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:51 am to WavinWilly
quote:
What’s the financial incentive to the land/mineral rights owner as well as the state/general public?
Pore space owner signs a lease, gets paid based off acreage.
Carbon units are formed. Injector wells drilled. Then storage “royalties” are paid out to the lessors.
It is the exact same thing as O&G production, except in reverse order.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:56 am to Herschal
quote:
Pore space owner signs a lease, gets paid based off acreage.
Carbon units are formed. Injector wells drilled. Then storage “royalties” are paid out to the lessors.
How much are they paying to lease the land and what are the royalties?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:15 am to BowDownToLSU
She’s for it. And her fiancé is the or one of the biggest lobbyists for it. She’s bought and paid for like all rinos.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:17 am to Sweep Da Leg
She was picked because she’s controllable. So whether she’s for or against it, she will do what the lobbyist on the hill tell her to do. That’s how you get an endorsement.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:21 am to blueboy
quote:
She's marrying a carbon capture lobbyist.
We may logically conclude that she is in favor of CC, since that is how her husband earns his wealthy living.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:21 am to Sweep Da Leg
Fleming cannot do diddly squat about it if elected. He's appealing to people with brains the size of a Democrat's
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:24 am to La Place Mike
quote:
How much are they paying to lease the land and what are the royalties?
It varies, much like O&G lease consideration, but I have seen $400/acre and also just flat $2000 to sign. No real set industry standard. Just depends on location really.
As far as royalties, I have seen numbers that range from $17/ton to $65/ton stored. Much in the same that tracts are pooled for production of O&G, you have various tracts people pooled to create these carbon units. But to exactly determine what people are being paid you would need to do some calculations involving tract/unit participation factors.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:27 am to BowDownToLSU
You might want to have a look at this
Scientists find ‘alarming’ levels of toxic metals, pollution in Lake Maurepas
Scientists find ‘alarming’ levels of toxic metals, pollution in Lake Maurepas
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:28 am to Herschal
quote:
I have seen numbers that range from $17/ton to $65/ton stored.
About how much could be stored per unit?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:29 am to BowDownToLSU
quote:
Carbon capture
Plant trees. You all fell for this shite as "bringing jobs to LA!!!!"
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:05 am to WillieD
quote:
You might want to have a look at this
That doesn't come from anything but runoff from wood processing, farming and lawns. Zero impact on CCS/
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:06 am to LemmyLives
quote:
You all fell for this shite as "bringing jobs to LA!!!!"
The same as drilling for oil/gas and operating an oilfield.
Popular
Back to top

11









