re: What Crime did Tulsi accuse Obama of committing?

Was Richard Nixon immune for his actions in Watergate? WHY did he need a pardon from Gerald Ford?

quote:

---

n terms of PR, this would be devastating for Trump if the DOJ did this to Obama and Obama quickly disposed of the case due to obvious immunity

---

A case can be built using defendants own statements at various times on intent. Obama himself saying Donald Trump Would NEVER be President.

Peter Strzok's e mails about stopping Trump from becoming President.

Jim Comey on video crowing about setting up General Flynn.

There's much more out there.

quote:

---

Obama himself saying Donald Trump Would NEVER be President.

---

Opinion

quote:

---

Peter Strzok's e mails about stopping Trump from becoming President.

---

Not enough, comment was made during an election cycle (Aug of 2016) and it would be argued that Strzok was referring to stopping Trump through the normal election process. Show me his actions that were unlawful.

quote:

---

Jim Comey on video crowing about setting up General Flynn.

---

Comey didn't crow about setting up Flynn. He admitted that he sent two FBI agents to interview flynn and confessed he wouldn't have been able to get away with that under Obama or Bush. But this doens't mean he was "Setting Flynn Up". Again, where is the proof of intent to harm.

Nothing would be proof for you.

But here's the thing Leghumper. They don't have to prove it to you., Just a jury. That jury may not think like you.

I can assure you most reasonable people won't think what Peter Strzok said
in an official FBI E mail had anything to do with the election cycle.

And when Comey made a confession he wouldn't have been able to get away with what he did to Flynn that reeked of set up..

Obama saying Trump would never be President....debatable...

There;s all kinds of stuff out there they can point to as to intent. The Internet is forever.

quote:

---

More seditious conspiracy than treason, but why mince words? Obama and everyone who participated should hang. Fukem.

---

This is the correct answer.

quote:

---

Nothing would be proof for you.

---

Actual proof would be enough for me. Right now you have opinionated statements (strzok and obama) and possibly biased but still procedurally correct actions (Comey's Interview).

If this is all they have, then I hate to break it to you, but you are going to be deeply disappointed.

quote:

---

The country got put through Hell by people that came to alleged conclusions with a lot less proof. They had NOTHING connecting Trump to any damned Russians and they put the nation through years of it.

---

I agree. Let's not repeat that mistake.

quote:

---

Nixon was gone. I guarantee you with the frenzy the media had whipped up and the vendetta the Democrats were on had a Pardon not been issued...there would have been at least an attempt to prosecute Nixon.

---

Sure. As he said, the entire point of the pardon was to avoid that.

What y'all are missing is the "why" involved, and how that relates to the Russiagate issue.

Prosecuting political opponents and losing would become the scandal y'all are projecting Russiagate to be.

Those bastards used their offices as a weapon. Instead of a peaceful transition of power they determined that they would undermine the incoming Administration by any means necessary, and they used this phony scandal to do it.

That's not even debatable. There was no Russian anything. They knew it. They pounded away and some are still selling the lie.

There has to be consequences for what they did.

quote:

---

You.

You're the enemy.

---

That's dumb, on multiple levels

Highly intelligent and productive people who believe in freedom are the enemy? Who do you consider your friends?

But certainly isn't treason.