
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Well that didn’t take long - BAKE THAT CAKE YOU DIRTY TEXAS CHRISTIAN!
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:28 am
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:28 am
And just like that, they’re going to force everyone (only Christians of course) to bake cakes regardless of religious beliefs
Texas to force Christian Judges to perform same sex marriage ceremonies
Texas to force Christian Judges to perform same sex marriage ceremonies
This post was edited on 11/7/26 at 7:30 am
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:33 am to Old Sarge
If gay marriage is legal in Texas and the judge is a steward of the law, then why should he be allowed to discriminate
Its not a private business, which has ever right to discriminate imo
Its not a private business, which has ever right to discriminate imo
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:33 am to Old Sarge
Clearly, it is a laughable matter. Government can try to tell any employee what to do. However, government can not force a Christian pastor or any religious leader to wed a pair whom the pastor or reverend feels is not within their belief scope.
Let government circle the drain.
Let government circle the drain.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:35 am to Old Sarge
Important things first. Gay marriage, then we'll work on making things more affordable. They fell for it, we saw it coming, but we had no one worth a shite to put against the story tellers?
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:37 am to Old Sarge
Kim Davis already tried this.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:38 am to Old Sarge
Judges should be impartial in the application of the law
This post was edited on 11/7/26 at 7:40 am
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:39 am to Lsut81
Will they make a Muslim serving an official government capacity in agriculture, touch and handle pigs?
Or a Muslim judge, marry gay people?
You know the answer, and you know the answer is no
Religious tolerance only applies to non-Christian religions
Or a Muslim judge, marry gay people?
You know the answer, and you know the answer is no
Religious tolerance only applies to non-Christian religions
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:42 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Texas to force Christian Judges to perform same sex marriage ceremonies
They can always step down if they can't do their job.
This post was edited on 11/7/26 at 7:43 am
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:42 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Will they make a Muslim serving an official government capacity in agriculture, touch and handle pigs?
Has that occurred yet
quote:
Or a Muslim judge, marry gay people?
I'd imagine someone will push the envelope and then sue
I'd imagine you aggies are in heaven with this ruling though
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:42 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Will they make a Muslim serving an official government capacity in agriculture, touch and handle pigs?
Or a Muslim judge, marry gay people?
I would argue that they should be forced to do those things, or resign.
On the other hand, how would you feel about a Muslim judge refusing to prosecute child marriages?
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:48 am to Lsut81
quote:
Its not a private business, which has ever right to discriminate imo
It is a private business.
Marrying people is something that judges are empowered to do but not required to do according to their job responsibilities.
It's basically a side hustle that they get paid extra for and the terms are negotiated between private parties.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:48 am to GoblinGuide
quote:
They can always step down if they can't do their job.
It's not part of their job.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:50 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
It is a private business.
Marrying people is something that judges are empowered to do but not required to do according to their job responsibilities.
It's basically a side hustle that they get paid extra for and the terms are negotiated between private parties.
If that's the case then this does get fuzzier. I thought this was a justice of the peace type situation.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:51 am to Old Sarge
Doesn’t a judge have plenary power over his proceedings? Maybe change the wording you use from “by the power vested in me by the State of Texas, I hereby pronounce you…..” to something along the lines of “the Supreme Court of Texas forces me to hereby pronounce you …..” That would certainly be an honest statement.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:52 am to Ingeniero
quote:
I would argue that they should be forced to do those things, or resign.
Why?
Marrying people is not a job responsibility.
It's a side business for them.
It's the equivalent of someone who drives a bus for a living making extra money using his CDL to transport people in his private vehicle on the weekends in an arrangement that his employer has nothing to do with.
It seems pretty clear to me that this is a Constitutional over reach.
quote:
how would you feel about a Muslim judge refusing to prosecute child marriages?
I would feel like that was an official duty of the judge and he or she wasn't doing his or her job.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:53 am to TBoy
quote:
Judges should be impartial in the application of the law
says the supporter of Justice Jumanji
This is how leftists say whatever they want with no consistency.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:54 am to Old Sarge
Judges shouldn’t be officiating weddings, anyway.
Aside from that, sitting on the bench is not a religious position so perform the functions of a judge when it comes up.
Aside from that, sitting on the bench is not a religious position so perform the functions of a judge when it comes up.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:54 am to Ingeniero
quote:
I thought this was a justice of the peace type situation.
If you read the whole article there's a bit in there about a judge who refused to marry same sex couples, but who referred them out to someone else "who charged the same price."
It's just like a pastor who officiates a wedding for extra money.
Hopefully no one here is in favor of forcing pastors to start marrying same sex couples.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:55 am to TBoy
quote:
Judges should be impartial in the application of the law
Hilarious coming from a leftist
Posted on 11/7/26 at 7:56 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
We were told that the figs and trannies were "unimportant.
That is the first thing the left moves on.
You really are lying pieces of shite. You own all of it.

Popular
Back to top


26









