- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/20/23 at 8:55 am to Padme
quote:
Is that belief not allowed?
Everyone is allowed to look stupid or crazy
*ETA: without any real evidence, at that.
This post was edited on 12/20/23 at 8:56 am
Posted on 12/20/23 at 8:56 am to memphisplaya
quote:
They want an extreme reaction. That’s it
So in effect...the Left's strategy/MO is to become tyrannical while subjectively applying unequal justice via corrupt bureaucracy and get an "extreme reaction"? Sounds viable.
The streets of this Nation will be in flames (again) if Trump wins and the Courts will be full of 'demonetized' MAGA 'Insurrectionists' if he don't. We can forget any hope for a political resolution of what is a polar ideological struggle. One Side wins and the other goes away; like the Jewish State v Hamas/Islamism.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Everyone is allowed to look stupid or crazy
You seem to take advantage of this on an almost hourly basis.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/20/23 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
*ETA: without any real evidence, at that.
Who needs evidence?
You are on record as supporting corrupt, biased Lawyers and Judges as a means to an end.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 8:58 am to Padme
Yep.
This autistic fk just yesterday voiced his support for corrupt Prosecutors, Lawyers and Judges.
He's legit insane.
This autistic fk just yesterday voiced his support for corrupt Prosecutors, Lawyers and Judges.
He's legit insane.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 8:59 am to skinny domino
quote:
skinny domino
Wednesday could probably take you in a fist fight. I'd hate to see what she could do to you in a courtroom.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 8:59 am to oogabooga68
quote:
You are on record as supporting corrupt, biased Lawyers and Judges as a means to an end.
Only in your head, bruv
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Only in your head, bruv
No, in response to the actions of corrupt Judges and Prosecutors, your response was "Yeah, but is he guilty".
It's in the thread, dickwad.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:00 am to Nosevens
quote:
State issue to vote not one to block voting rights
This. This is similar to SCOTUS and FedGov getting involved with Civil Rights and voting to ensure that minorities aren’t prevented from voting due to discriminatory laws designed to target them.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:False!
Which means this clause could never be used for them if the Presidential impeachment process is the avenue.
If you lead a revolt against the country when Trump is re-elected, and you are found guilty of insurrection, you could be disqualified for office under the 14th A. In fact, if Congress delegated said determination to the Courts (e.g., under auspices that there was not enough time to complete the POTUS Senate trial), the Courts could intercede in the absence of interbranch conflict, even in the case of an impeachable official. But once a Legislative determination, in full Constitutional compliance, has been made, there is no avenue for Judicial override.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:01 am to oogabooga68
quote:
No, in response to the actions of corrupt Judges and Prosecutors, your response was "Yeah, but is he guilty".
Literally not what I said. Again, in your head, bruv.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Sorry, chief, but you misspelled the word "yes"
Via that acquittal, was he deemed qualified to run again?
No
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:05 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
If you lead a revolt against the country when Trump is re-elected, and you are found guilty of insurrection, you could be disqualified for office under the 14th A.
You mean the criminal act? That's nothing like the impeachment process.
Why are you referencing a different law/process?
quote:
But once a Legislative determination, in full Constitutional compliance, has been made, there is no avenue for Judicial override.
Again, this only applies to the limited purposes of the impeachment-removal process. Judicial review would be limited within that specific procedure.
The disqualification under the 14A is something completely different.
Any application of this has to be universal, so if you are proposing that the Presidential impeachment-removal process is the avenue to apply the 14A, then we couldn't remove Representatives or Senators (even though the clause specifically lists them). How does this work? Seems absurd.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But when the decision as to whom to prosecute is based on Political bias, then the case is poison from jumpstreet
quote:
Even if an actual crime occurred that can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt?
This is YOU defending the actions of a corrupt Prosecutor.
It can not be interpreted any other way.
No different than a crooked cop denying a perp's rights then screaming to the Judge "but what if he's actually guilty".....
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:06 am to Dday63
quote:
But one cannot really argue whether CO should enforce the Constitutionally mandated qualifications for office.
That's not what's being argued. What's being argued is they are trying to create law from nothing. Trump has been found guilty of nothing related to any insurrection (real or alleged). Their decision blatantly defies the 14th Amendment's Due Process protections.
Their decision falsely tries to cloak itself in Constitutionality while blatantly defies the Constitution.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:07 am to oogabooga68
quote:
This is YOU defending the actions of a corrupt Prosecutor.
No. This is me trying to get NC to give me the definition of lawfare.
Nowhere did I make any positive assertion or claim that Trump was guilty.
quote:
It can not be interpreted any other way.
Maybe to a completely biased person who is too emotional to have this discussion.
quote:
No different than a crooked cop denying a perp's rights then screaming to the Judge "but what if he's actually guilty".
That is "lawfare" too?
Back to the drawing board.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. This is me trying to get NC to give me the definition of lawfare.
You're a gdamned liar.
This is you being a bad Cop.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:10 am to Bard
quote:
Trump has been found guilty of nothing related to any insurrection
This isn't exactly true. CO did engage in a process that decided he engaged in insurrection. That isn't really in doubt.
What is in doubt is if this process is sufficient for the 14A (and various associated issues). I doubt the USSC agrees this was sufficient or proper for the determination.
Page 5 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News