1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We need more Republicans Like Brandon Gill
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:58 am to Federal Tiger
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:58 am to Federal Tiger
quote:shining light on lunacy tends to lower suppprt for said lunacy therefore strengthening the Nation to an extent
Outside of meaningless hearings, what has he done to strengthen this Nation?
Similar to cracking a mule across the head with a 2x4 tends to make him pay attention, at least for a few minutes
Posted on 7/26/26 at 11:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Bandon Gill is doing impressions of Congressmen and Senators who have been doing this for decades and none of them were assassinated.
So was Charlie Kirk. And your side killed him.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 12:12 pm to Federal Tiger
quote:
we want action and not soundbites
This crowd is 100% about the soundbites
Posted on 7/26/26 at 12:18 pm to DTRooster
quote:
shining light on lunacy tends to lower suppprt for said lunacy therefore strengthening the Nation to an extent
Yeah, to an extent. Silly Dem ideas can get called out, that’s fair play. But sarcasm only gets you so far.
The problem though, is not enacting any good policies to strengthen the nation.
That’s the part the GOP doesn’t want to do when they have control of Congress.
Comedians and podcasters have all the sarcasm. We need grown ups in Congress. Governing does more than sarcasm.
If anyone can fix our horrible system with exorbitant health care costs, that would get my vote.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 12:55 pm to Robcrzy
He is great, but does anything of significance come from him exposing how fraudulent they are?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 12:57 pm to Zgeo
quote:
Those far left. Loonies don’t like being questioned by Gill in an o the record hearing. Gill makes them look evil just with basic questions…..
Most of his questions are "yes" or "no" and they can't or won't answer because then the cat is totally out of the bag. Their responses tell me they don't really believe what they endorse but do so because they are either paid to or anything for the party. You have to remember with leftists, the end always justifies the means.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The guy who assassinated CK was not a libertarian my dude
You are the libertarian guy who always defends liberals, so close enough
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:00 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I’ve watched some shite that party has put out and my god, that’s the wackiest group of far left liberals I’ve ever seen.
Libertarians are just more fiscally conservative liberals. They support all the whacky shite just the same.
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:05 pm to Robcrzy
She looks like her mother was drinking Old Crow up to full term.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:06 pm to Robcrzy
I'm jealous of how good looking that dude is, man crush.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:31 pm to Robcrzy
There are no better members of Congress than Brandon Gill, Anna Paulina Luna and Tim Burchett.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:47 pm to Powerman
quote:
He just comes up with gotcha questions like this.
They're not hard questions. All you have to do is tell the truth.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:49 pm to Zach
Exactly. The ABA for example claims we’re all biased implicitly. How is it a “gotcha” to ask the president of the ABA to tell us her biases?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 4:09 pm to Riverside
It’s not a gotcha, per se. But it doesn’t bring any value to the hearing.
So what was the point?
Let’s say she answered, “My biases aren’t relevant. But since you asked, I’m biased against people who drink coca-cola instead of Dr. Pepper.”
What does this accomplish in the end?
How does that line of questioning discredit the ABA?
So what was the point?
Let’s say she answered, “My biases aren’t relevant. But since you asked, I’m biased against people who drink coca-cola instead of Dr. Pepper.”
What does this accomplish in the end?
How does that line of questioning discredit the ABA?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 4:10 pm to Robcrzy
He could be a future republican leader.....bigtime leader!
He is outstanding in many ways....
He is outstanding in many ways....
Posted on 7/26/26 at 4:47 pm to Riverside
quote:
Exactly. The ABA for example claims we’re all biased implicitly. How is it a “gotcha” to ask the president of the ABA to tell us her biases?
Liberals don’t like be proven hypocrites.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 12:23 am to AGGIES
quote:
It’s not a gotcha, per se. But it doesn’t bring any value to the hearing.
So what was the point?
Proves that the person isnt qualified to be in their job
Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:56 am to djsdawg
quote:
Proves that the person isnt qualified to be in their job
Exactly. A lot of these people are just biased figure heads who have some how managed to get to the top of their profession. You would think the head of the Smithsonian would want to simple present historical facts but yey she is pushing a false white supremacy narrative.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 7:14 am to Robcrzy
More theater.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 8:02 am to Robcrzy
And less like, Murkowski and Collins! And the losers who have been primaried in their respective states, like our very own back-stabbing, bitch, Bill Cassidy!
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News