Started By
Message

re: We have nothing in common.

Posted on 9/25/19 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29044 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

If we scrap our immigration laws, and just accept whomever walks across our border, we don't have any borders.
Again, which candidates hold this position? I'm pretty sure all of them think immigration without papers should still be illegal, that there should be a legal process to gain citizenship, and that deportations will still be a thing.
quote:

frick, are you all stupid?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29044 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

See above.
I'm not seeing any candidates listed with their immigration policy proposals.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14671 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Again, which candidates hold this position?


It would be much easier to answer which ones of them do not, dipshit #1. Have you been in a cave for the last 3-4 years?

quote:

I'm pretty sure all of them think immigration without papers should still be illegal


Prove it. Give me one socialist democrat proposal for punishment, for committing this illegal act.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14671 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

I'm not seeing any candidates listed with their immigration policy proposals.


Have any of them come out in support of prosecuting criminal illegals for entering our country? No? Then they don't support our immigration laws against entering this country illegally.

Have any of the candidates come out in support of preventing criminal illegals from receiving taxpayer dollars for healthcare, food housing, college tuition? No? Then they support open borders, and an invasion. It's that simple. And until you can produce one fricking piece of evidence to the contrary, pretty much everyone here recognizes that you are completely full of shite.

ETA: I'm hurt. All you have left are down votes. And we had so much in common...
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 1:03 pm
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29044 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

It would be much easier to answer which ones of them do not, dipshit #1
I take it you can't answer the question, then?
quote:

Prove it. Give me one socialist democrat proposal for punishment, for committing this illegal act.
Is there a reason you said "socialist democrat" instead of just democrat? Are you breaking from the board narrative that all dems/libs are the same by excluding mainstream dems, or is that just your personal term for democrats and you're lumping everyone together? Hard to tell around here.

Anyway, nearly half the candidates say they wouldn't change the punishment. Rather, they would make enforcement more humane. The rest want to make it a civil offense rather than criminal, I believe. Which, if we're being rational, it probably shouldn't be a criminal offense. The punishment should fit the crime, should it not? If the worst you've done is gone some place you're not supposed to go, should you go to jail? You didn't hurt anyone, or steal anything, or do anything that endangers others. You just went somewhere. Should you be locked up?
Posted by jackamo3300
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2004
2901 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

I can't tell which half you're talking about.


It's almost embarrassingly easy.

The "half" that actually celebrates every manner of behavior that seeks to do everything possible to impede the furtherance of Western culture/civilization to succeeding generations.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29044 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Have any of them come out in support of prosecuting criminal illegals for entering our country? No? Then they don't support our immigration laws against entering this country illegally.
There are two parts to this; the offense, and the punishment. "Open borders" would be making the offense no longer an offense. The current crop of candidates, as far as I know, want to keep the offense and modify the punishment.
quote:

Have any of the candidates come out in support of preventing criminal illegals from receiving taxpayer dollars for healthcare, food housing, college tuition? No? Then they support open borders, and an invasion. It's that simple.


Excuse me while I marvel at your incredible logical leaping ability!

They support an invasion, it's that simple? My god, you need help.

I don't know the details of every candidate's position on taxpayer dollars supporting illegals, but you're acting like every lib wants to stand at the border with buckets of cash to hand to everyone coming here. That's simply not at all based in reality. The candidates that do talk about healthcare and tuition for immigrants do so in the context of a broader overhaul of the immigration process.
quote:

ETA: I'm hurt. All you have left are down votes. And we had so much in common...
I haven't given a single downvote in this thread. I've probably only given less than 10 downvotes on this site over the last year or more.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

There are two parts to this; the offense, and the punishment. "Open borders" would be making the offense no longer an offense. The current crop of candidates, as far as I know, want to keep the offense and modify the punishment.



Well. They don't want to "modify" it. They want to eliminate it.

I mean come on. If we outlaw murder......but have no actual penalties for murder, are we REALLY against murder?

quote:

Excuse me while I marvel at your incredible logical leaping ability!



If you demand to stop enforcing a law.........while actively helping the potential perps to violate the law........you support the action.

The logical leap it takes to deny this is astonishing
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:19 pm to
“Keep the offense and modify the punishment”

I e make the “punishment” negligible

Leftists always obfuscate because their ideas are shite

Anybody supporting sanctuary cities supports open borders
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:19 pm to
quote:


I don't know the details of every candidate's position on taxpayer dollars supporting illegals, but you're acting like every lib wants to stand at the border with buckets of cash to hand to everyone coming here.

Literally every single candidate raised their hands saying "yes" to exactly this.

Oh. I get it. You think if they don't LITERALLY stand their with buckets, it doesn't count.
quote:

The candidates that do talk about healthcare and tuition for immigrants do so in the context of a broader overhaul of the immigration process
NONE OF THEM WANT ANY PENALTIES

THAT is their "overhaul"!!

Sheesh. Talk about dancing around reality
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
133253 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:20 pm to
Just bring on the boogaloo
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29044 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Well. They don't want to "modify" it. They want to eliminate it.
Should the punishment fit the crime?
quote:

If you demand to stop enforcing a law
*Enforce it differently.
quote:

while actively helping the potential perps to violate the law
Who is doing this?
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14671 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Is there a reason you said "socialist democrat" instead of just democrat?


Because the overwhelming majority of democrats are Marxist/socialists, leading as it always does, to communism. Just being accurate. They've lumped themselves together, skippy. You really need to get out of that cave.

quote:

Anyway, nearly half the candidates say they wouldn't change the punishment. Rather, they would make enforcement more humane.


We have somewhere between 10 and 30 million criminal illegals in this country right now. What exactly is the punishment half of the socialist democrats wouldn't change, with the exception of making enforcement more humane, whatever that means?

Given that we have tens of millions of people violating our immigration laws, and hundreds of thousands more violating it every month, would you say that this mysterious punishment is adequate? Would you say that since half of the socialist democrat candidates think so, that half of socialist democrats themselves think so?

quote:

The rest want to make it a civil offense rather than criminal, I believe.


So the other half find this mysterious punishment, which has played it's part in the American taxpayer footing a 200+ billion dollar expense every year for criminal illegals, too harsh. Do you think this represents the other half of the socialist democrats? And what do you think all that means concerning my assertion that socialist democrats are advocating for open borders?

quote:

Which, if we're being rational, it probably shouldn't be a criminal offense. The punishment should fit the crime, should it not?


Don't ever accuse me of being rational, then. Because I think that we could stop criminal illegals coming across our border completely by having our National Guard shoot these invaders, as they attempt to cross. If that doesn't work, shoot the invaders, and bomb the Mexican capitol, preferably the president and the legislators houses, one per day, until the invasion stops. Illegal immigration would be zero, within a month.

quote:

If the worst you've done is gone some place you're not supposed to go, should you go to jail? You didn't hurt anyone, or steal anything, or do anything that endangers others. You just went somewhere. Should you be locked up?


Yep. It's called trespassing. People get locked up for it every fricking day.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29044 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Literally every single candidate raised their hands saying "yes" to exactly this.

Oh. I get it. You think if they don't LITERALLY stand their with buckets, it doesn't count.

So, we seem to be at a point where the LITERAL meaning of words no longer matters. Instead, the opposition's stance is whatever YOU think it is. Correct?
quote:

NONE OF THEM WANT ANY PENALTIES
Correction, nearly half of the current crop of dem candidates want to keep the current penalties. And of the rest, can you give me the name of just one who wants no penalties at all for illegal immigration? Pretty sure they are all for civil penalties at the very least.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

So, we seem to be at a point where the LITERAL meaning of words no longer matters. Instead, the opposition's stance is whatever YOU think it is. Correct?



Well. Ya know. In 2019, I don't actually have to be at the border with buckets of cash to promise you buckets of cash.

This ain't 1700.

quote:

Correction, nearly half of the current crop of dem candidates want to keep the current penalties
This is just a bald faced lie.

quote:

And of the rest, can you give me the name of just one who wants no penalties at all for illegal immigration? Pretty sure they are all for civil penalties at the very least.

0 of them oppose sanctuary cities.

And, ALL of them oppose Trump enforcing current law and have backed every action taken by the left to stop him from doing so.

So. You go ahead and name one that actually wants to stop people at the border and kick out illegals who are arrested on this side of the border.

Just one.

I'll wait.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Sure when there stated position doesn't jive with there actual actions it is hard.



Agreed. Sounds familiar...
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Can you properly represent the position of what each half wants?


I can represent what each half claims they want.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31268 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:54 pm to
We have tons in common, you just let your anger and partisan drive a wedge on everything. You walk up to people everyday and talk with them and laugh and drink beers and have a good time, many of those same people disagree with you politically. Crazy I know. Stop thinking of people as your enemy and enjoy life baw, y’all take this partisan crap way too seriously
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29044 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Because the overwhelming majority of democrats are Marxist/socialists, leading as it always does, to communism.
This is just plain false.
quote:

They've lumped themselves together, skippy.
Judging from this thread and board, it's the far right that is lumping all of the left with the far left.
quote:

You really need to get out of that cave.
And into yours?
quote:

We have somewhere between 10 and 30 million criminal illegals in this country right now. What exactly is the punishment half of the socialist democrats wouldn't change, with the exception of making enforcement more humane, whatever that means?
More humane would be treating people like people instead of animals, especially those people who are following your own party's advice of pull yourself up by your boostraps, if you can't survive where you live, move, get out of a bad environment, etc.
quote:

Given that we have tens of millions of people violating our immigration laws, and hundreds of thousands more violating it every month, would you say that this mysterious punishment is adequate?
If we're locking up people at the border and breaking up families, and STILL "hundreds of thousands" are crossing every month, how fricking far do you want to ramp up punishment in order to "solve" this problem? In general, if THAT many people are breaking a law, and breaking said law doesn't involve hurting or endangering anyone else, then the problem is with the law, not the people.

What would be so awful about streamlining the immigration process, so much so that it's clearly a better option than crossing illegally? Is it because you're worried about our jobs?
quote:

Don't ever accuse me of being rational, then.
Don't worry.
quote:

Because I think that we could stop criminal illegals coming across our border completely by having our National Guard shoot these invaders, as they attempt to cross. If that doesn't work, shoot the invaders, and bomb the Mexican capitol, preferably the president and the legislators houses, one per day, until the invasion stops.

quote:

Yep. It's called trespassing. People get locked up for it every fricking day.
Trespassing pertains to private property.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
40200 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

It is beyond time to divide up and move on.


How? We don't divide geographically.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram