Started By
Message

re: We have ethanol because farmers in Iowa want your money

Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:17 pm to
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:17 pm to
We have a food pyramid because the government wanted to sell grains.
Posted by highcotton2
Alabama
Member since Feb 2010
9434 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

My truck gets 2 more mpg on highway with pure gasoline. frick ethanol.


This is from a AAA study.
quote:

most experts agree that that using E10 will reduce most vehicles mpg by three or four percent.


quote:

If the difference between the two fuels is 11 cents or less, buy pure gas. If it’s greater than 11 cents, you’re saving money by purchasing E10.”


Posted by Dr E Coli
Member since Apr 2018
1177 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:26 pm to
Ethanol in a marine fiberglass gas tank will dissolve some fiberglass particle components that can plug your marine engine.

Regarding small engines, use straight 89 to 93 octane, whatever is available in your marketplace. Don't go on the cheap for fuel to a small engine. Read that as - don't use 87 or 88 octane either.
Posted by Dr E Coli
Member since Apr 2018
1177 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

My truck gets 2 more mpg on highway with pure gasoline. frick ethanol.


Look at it another way...

Dollars per 87 octane (88, 89) gallon whatever you are using divided by your miles per gallon.

- then -

Dollars per e85 gallon divided by your miles per gallon using e85 (2 miles per gallon less than above)

- result -

Your cost of operating your vehicle per mile will be much less using e85 than operating on 87 octane.

Lower your operating expense with a trade off of stopping to fill-up a little more often.
This post was edited on 3/11/19 at 12:33 pm
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
5622 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

quote:
Corn, for the most part, will be the downfall of this country .... on so many levels.


except whiskey. Whiskey is pretty special but frick corn for everything but whiskey.


Ethanol, in and of itself is not bad. And fresh corn at the end of the summer is some of the best tasting stuff I have ever eaten.

As for the politics...well, yeah, we are getting screwed.
Posted by Dr E Coli
Member since Apr 2018
1177 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Iowa is making money off of fricking up engines with ethanol and causing diabetes with high fructose corn syrup.

SMH


Just clearing up some items above.

There are 2 kinds of Corn Ethanol production.

1.) "Dry Grind" facility = Corn as the input and Ethanol, Distillers Grains and CO2 as the outputs. A Dry Grind facility CANNOT make High Fructose Corn Syrup. The bulk majority of ethanol comes from these types of facilities.

2.) "Wet Mill" facility = Corn as the input and High Fructose Corn Syrup, Corn Gluten Meal, Corn Gluten Feed, Corn Germ, Corn Bran and a whole host of other by-products/co-products and Ethanol can be one of those products, but a Wet Mill can operate WITHOUT producing a drop of ethanol. Depends on how they stream their plant to operate versus the economics of the stream being produced.
This post was edited on 3/11/19 at 12:43 pm
Posted by crazyLSUstudent
391 miles away from Tiger Stadium
Member since Mar 2012
5530 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:42 pm to
Lol @ your time scale. The energy landscape is going to fundamentally change in the next 10 years due to wind/solar and battery technology
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:44 pm to
Is it just Iowa? The corn belt is a lot bigger than Iowa

I would rather hogs be subsidized if they have to do anything, at least get some cheap pulled pork out of it

I had a pork chop in Iowa 30 years ago and I still remember it
Posted by Dr E Coli
Member since Apr 2018
1177 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

I remember when it first came on the scene after the 1973 embargo. Folk s called the mixture Gasohol. Kind of like cutting a barrel of whiskey with water to make it last longer.


Henry Ford built the Model-T to run on ethanol before considering gasoline as a fuel source. The second fuel source considered was Kerosene. Big oil changed that from the get go.

Gasohol did nothing but confuse folks.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89613 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

The energy landscape is going to fundamentally change in the next 10 years due to wind/solar and battery technology


Just like with ethanol, show me where it works, economically, without government subsidies and we'll see.

Electrical and wind are supplemental power sources (as are hydro electric and geothermal) until they aren't. "They aren't" happens when they can produce enough for our commercial and industrial demands.

In 2018 - Wind+Solar accounted for 8.2% of our production (no one seriously suggests we have much of a power "surplus", although there is surplus capacity in some areas).

To even get to a majority of our demands, those 2 sources would have to increase 6 fold. For renewables (all sources, including hydro), they would still have to triple.

So, I stand by my 50 to 60 years - AT THE SOONEST.

Until then, evil, disgusting, dirty "fossil fuels" will still continue to produce 50 to 65 percent of our electrical power, as they do now.
This post was edited on 3/11/19 at 12:48 pm
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Being brutally honest, the idea of having a right to other people’s money and using govenment to take it is as much an American ideal now as anything else.

It would behoove us small government types to engage and try to change minds.


Why stop there? Maybe you can stop private for profit prisons that Republicans love to have us pay for.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89613 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Maybe you can stop private for profit prisons that Republicans love to have us pay for.


Not exactly apples to apples, though. Private contractors are providing a service. The cost-benefit analysis there is what would it cost to do it with civil servants (with corresponding benefits) versus a "pay as you go", scale up/down model that contracting affords.

Not saying it is perfect, but we don't "need" ethanol. No one needs it except corn farmers and corn state politicians, to be honest (much like rice subsidies in Louisiana - no one is immune). A favorite trick of lawmakers is to buy our votes with our own money.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37733 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

except whiskey. Whiskey is pretty special but frick corn for everything but whiskey.

The best whiskey is distilled from small nice heirloom corn growers located in Kentucky, Tennessee and Canada. Most whiskey makers do not use the GMO corn Iowa corn farmers produce to make corn syrup, ethanol alcohol and cattle feed among other things.

Very few people really understood the gist of Interstellar, the movie, (and I certainly did not agree with the science) but the part about what got us there .... the corn part, I totally agree with, it is where we are headed on a fast track.

And the worst part is - is that it can be avoided.
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7179 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 1:17 pm to
I am no IB Freeman but I chime in on my aversion to ethanol subsidies any chance I get. Our federal ethanol policy is the single worst policy in a government full of them. Ethanol is a less efficient fuel and hard on small engines. Our subsidies drive up food prices, increase pollution and CO2, and require more arable land to be devoted to raising a fuel that no one wants. Thanks for the opportunity to rip on ethanol!
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Not exactly apples to apples, though. Private contractors are providing a service. The cost-benefit analysis there is what would it cost to do it with civil servants (with corresponding benefits) versus a "pay as you go", scale up/down model that contracting affords.



No private prisons are a scam and are absolutely unnecessary. How could we as Americans be okay with that conflict of interest? They literally make more money based on how many prisoners they have and it all comes out of our pockets.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89613 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

They literally make more money based on how many prisoners they have and it all comes out of our pockets.


Well, it would be a problem if they wrote laws and enforced those laws. But those functions are filled by public servants.

If they were in "public" run prisons you think that would be cheaper and not cost more per prisoner?
Posted by Toroballistic
Tallahassee
Member since Dec 2017
1911 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

They literally make more money based on how many prisoners they have and it all comes out of our pockets.


Well since it would cost more to feed and guard 1,000 people than 100 people this is common sense.

Can private prisons arrest and jail people?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33584 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

They started putting that shite in our food and it's way worse than sugar.
It's exactly equally bad as sugar.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45850 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 2:07 pm to
Ethanol is why I just purchased my first battery operated lawnmower. My yard isn't that big and the battery on this is 80V 6a. No more taking it apart, replacing the gas tank, or fuel line or shitty carburetor clogged with corn syrup for me.
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 2:10 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram