
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We are 2 short weeks away from the 2-year anniversary of the Black Insurrectionist exposé
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:16 pm to NPComb
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:16 pm to NPComb
quote:
Why don’t you subscribe to the lesser of two evils of a majority of your values are represented by one over the other.
Because that's irrational and a terrible way to form political opinions or principles.
That cognitive dissonances leads to in-group bias, which becomes in-group favoritism...and is the slippery slope to all sorts of terrible priming and, ultimately, indoctrination and loss of individual identity (we call them NPCs, for short these days, as you should know).
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:17 pm to mudshuvl05
quote:
but it's definitely giving terminally online incel vibes.
I literally post 2 long arse threads from this board.
It was THE story of the MAGA echosphere for about a week 2 years ago
It's been repeated many times prior and since. It SHOULD be a lesson to Mulders who keep falling for it again and again (as stated ITT, another example is going on right now)
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
SlowFappingPro weird porn brah.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
You called the anonymous Black Insurrectionist drops obvious bullshite before the AP confirmed it was a white grifter. Good job.
SloFlo spent years calling the entire Ukraine biolabs topic Russian conspiracy nonsense—“Muh Bio Labs,” normal facilities, pure silliness. Then the DNI declassified the U.S. funding of 120+ biological labs across 30+ countries (dozens in Ukraine), some holding dangerous pathogens with known biosafety issues in a war zone.
He gets a win on this one, but we get to ignore his other posts that crashed spectacularly.
Take your victory lap.
SloFlo spent years calling the entire Ukraine biolabs topic Russian conspiracy nonsense—“Muh Bio Labs,” normal facilities, pure silliness. Then the DNI declassified the U.S. funding of 120+ biological labs across 30+ countries (dozens in Ukraine), some holding dangerous pathogens with known biosafety issues in a war zone.
He gets a win on this one, but we get to ignore his other posts that crashed spectacularly.
Take your victory lap.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:22 pm to 10thyrsr
quote:
SloFlo spent years calling the entire Ukraine biolabs topic Russian conspiracy nonsense
I was proven right there too.
People are engaging in a kernel of truth fallacy, post hoc, as I have pointed out many times.
"Biolabs" =/= "biological weapons programs"
quote:
Then the DNI declassified the U.S. funding of 120+ biological labs across 30+ countries
And 0 "biological weapons programs" proving me right.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
You’re moving the goalposts in real time. You didn’t spend years carefully saying “labs exist but no weapons programs.” You called the whole topic “Muh Bio Labs” Russian conspiracy nonsense and pure silliness.
The DNI confirmed the labs, the funding, the pathogens, and the biosafety problems. Zero weapons programs doesn’t rewrite what you actually said.
The DNI confirmed the labs, the funding, the pathogens, and the biosafety problems. Zero weapons programs doesn’t rewrite what you actually said.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:29 pm to 10thyrsr
quote:
You’re moving the goalposts in real time.
The opposite. I have never denied that Ukraine had biological labs.
quote:
. You didn’t spend years carefully saying “labs exist but no weapons programs.”
You need to go back and read what I said, then.
quote:
You called the whole topic “Muh Bio Labs” Russian conspiracy nonsense and pure silliness.
Russia said they were biological weapons program
It was the Qtards who ran with "bio labs" which is why I mocked them with muh Bio Labs. They are now moving goalposts using the kernel of truth fallacy to claim that the fact Ukraine had bio labs (which no rational person disagreed with 4 years ago) proves the conspiracy theories (which were about biological weapons programs and other CTs related to bio labs).
That's a fallacy, and I have pointed it out numerous times.
Once again, I was right.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:29 pm to 10thyrsr
quote:
Zero weapons programs doesn’t rewrite what you actually said.
No, your dishonesty is what's rewriting what I actually said
quote:
Wuhan isn't a bio weapons lab, either.
Note: I think CV19 originated in the Wuhan lab, also.
LINK
Posted on 3/9/22 at 6:59 am to thebigmuffaletta
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
You’re right that the labs never equaled a weapons program. Russia’s maximal claim is the part that fell apart.
The problem is the retcon. You didn’t spend years carefully separating “labs exist” from “weapons programs.” You mocked people pointing at the US-funded network, the pathogens, and the biosafety issues as “muh Bio Labs” nonsense. The DNI confirmed that part. Folding the documented scale and risk into the same silliness as the weapons is the problem.
The problem is the retcon. You didn’t spend years carefully separating “labs exist” from “weapons programs.” You mocked people pointing at the US-funded network, the pathogens, and the biosafety issues as “muh Bio Labs” nonsense. The DNI confirmed that part. Folding the documented scale and risk into the same silliness as the weapons is the problem.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:37 pm to 10thyrsr
quote:
The problem is the retcon. You didn’t spend years carefully separating “labs exist” from “weapons programs.”
I just disproved this false statement entirely

Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
If you spent years carefully saying the labs existed and only mocking the weapons claim, quote it.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Because that's irrational and a terrible way to form political opinions or principles. That cognitive dissonances leads to in-group bias, which becomes in-group favoritism...and is the slippery slope to all sorts of terrible priming and, ultimately, indoctrination and loss of individual identity (we call them NPCs, for short these days, as you should know).
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:46 pm to 10thyrsr
I literally just linked a post of mine from March 2022 discussing the conflation
Look up
It has the quote and link
Look up
It has the quote and link
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
One March 2022 post discussing the conflation doesn’t establish that you spent years carefully separating “labs exist” from the weapons claim. It shows you made the distinction once.
Other people on this board were already calling you out in early 2022 for dismissing the topic outright and assuring it “couldn’t possibly be.”
Linking a single post doesn’t erase that record or turn the DNI confirmation of the funded network, pathogens, and biosafety issues into a win for you.
Other people on this board were already calling you out in early 2022 for dismissing the topic outright and assuring it “couldn’t possibly be.”
Linking a single post doesn’t erase that record or turn the DNI confirmation of the funded network, pathogens, and biosafety issues into a win for you.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 2:22 am to SlowFlowPro
Nobody believes your bullshite. Get banned again and give us all a break. You are an insufferable twit.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 4:01 am to SlowFlowPro
So much wishcasting by the true believers (people who believe anything just because it’s posted to Twitter) over something that was so obviously Fake News. Several posters were saying even after it was likely exposed as false they didn’t care because it could hurt Tim Walz. The truth doesn’t matter anymore. As long as MAGABarbiePatriot90210 posts it to Twitter they believe it.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 5:15 am to lurking
quote:
Hard to consider you or your threads to be objective observations because of this.
This is the proper take on all his posts - I try to offer commendations to him on impartial posts and can think of perhaps 3 or 4 such occurrences.
The rest of his near half-million posts are lap-dog praise of any liberal controversy - and the worse it is the least likely he will even comment.
But no conservative leaning post escapes his meticulous dissection unless is so universally true and then he has no comment.
/\ all above based on my own limited and admittedly conservative opinion of right/wrong and true/false.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 5:25 am to SlowFlowPro
This is actually pathetic. Get a life dude
First 3 pages of the first thread are full of people calling it fake
what's your point? Everyone knew it was fake from the get go yet you're mocking them for it?
quote:
Here's 2 threads to serve as a walk down memory lane
First 3 pages of the first thread are full of people calling it fake
This post was edited on 10/12/26 at 5:33 am

Popular
Back to top



1







