- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Watch Live: Attorney General Jeff Sessions testifies before Senate Intelligence Committee
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:11 pm to fouldeliverer
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:11 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
I love the high quality of posts in this thread. I honestly feel like I'm watching this with a bunch of baws drunk on bud light making dumbass immature comments.
quote:
fouldeliverer
LSU Fan
Lannisport
Member since Nov 2008
12757 posts
Online
since you deliver foul I am sure you are so much smarter than all here. I mean really. If you don't like it no one has a gun to your head to read here.
if the comments seem dumbass, it is quite possibly because this is a witch hunt.
name the criminal investigation that Mueller is investigating. as one Senator has said today, pages and pages in their committee show no Russia collusion with Trump.
1
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:12 pm to golfntiger32
quote:
Eric Holders policy when it came to Fast and Furious
what happened to Holder over that? I can't recall.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:The issue is Trump wants to invoke executive privilege without saying he's invoking executive privilege
i mean the AG is the attorney for the US and represents the government. as a policy concern, why would we think the AG should be allowed to repeat private conversations with the President?
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:13 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
I love the high quality of posts in this thread. I honestly feel like I'm watching this with a bunch of baws drunk on bud light making dumbass immature comments.
Chill out. It's a joke. Just like your interpretation of DOJ policies.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:14 pm to Iosh
quote:
The issue is Trump wants to invoke executive privilege without saying he's invoking executive privilege
oh i agree
but Sessions can't make him do it and Sessions would basically be violating it by answer those questions
if this is the hill the DEMs die on after this hearing, it shows how little they actually have
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:14 pm to Iosh
quote:
The issue is Trump wants to invoke executive privilege without saying he's invoking executive privilege
possibly
or it's just a matter of, you know, hey lets not discuss private conversations with the president in an OPEN HEARING
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if this is the hill the DEMs die on after this hearing, it shows how little they actually have
it is the hill. the talking points are being formed.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:15 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
It's long standing policy- policy that um may not uh be actually written down- it is my uh view of policy.
Are you talking about the policy of the AG not discussing communications with the President? Do you seriously not understand why the Attorney General's private conversations with the President and/or other high ranking officials of the administration might be confidential and probably even privileged?
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:16 pm to elposter
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Sessions wouldn't be violating it if Trump hasn't already asserted it. Executive privilege isn't automatically created like attorney-client privilege or whatever, it has to be affirmatively asserted by the President.
Sessions can't make him do it and Sessions would basically be violating it by answer those questions
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:17 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
test
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:18 pm to Iosh
quote:
Executive privilege isn't automatically created like attorney-client privilege or whatever, it has to be affirmatively asserted by the President.
yeah but i mean we're getting into what amount to very minute legal technicalities that are way too focused in that arena
if Sessions violates that trust, he's going to get fired himself (for cause)
if Sessions has to answer, they can hold him in contempt if he doesn't. that's the proper mechanism to parse out those issues
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Lankford is a patriot.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:19 pm to HailToTheChiz
It's a trap
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:19 pm to tigersandsaints
go ahead on Mr Lankford 
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:19 pm to golfntiger32
Senator Lankford channeling you bruh.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:20 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:Seriously. Might be a good SCOTUS appointment one day.
Senator Angus King is a god damn alpha
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:20 pm to tigersandsaints
Langford bringing the Wood. Dude is about the only legit mind up there...,
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:20 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
this is a witch hunt
i bet it makes you feel better to say that.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:20 pm to tigersandsaints
I don't really care for sessions, but this hearing really makes clear how little the dems actually have. This entire russia narrative regarding trump appears to be a totally media driven story.
Page 17 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News