- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Watch Live: Attorney General Jeff Sessions testifies before Senate Intelligence Committee
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:02 pm to PillPusher
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:02 pm to PillPusher
quote:
Amazing something with Parkinson's can hold federal public office.
She doesn't have Parkinson's
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:02 pm to drexyl
Sessions needs to dare this beta to charge him with contempt.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:02 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
can't wait for the fact checking of Sessions not repeating what the President said
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:02 pm to Hawkeye95
She doesn't have Parkinsons.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:03 pm to conservativewifeymom
Hold em in contempt and lock him up you moron
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:03 pm to Wildcat In Germany
Sessions is just trolling at this point
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:03 pm to TuDog
wow dem accusing Sessions of obstructing.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:04 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
wow dem accusing Sessions of obstructing.
Shocker? I am surprised it took this long.
This post was edited on 6/13/17 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
It really doesn't sound like Sessions has a clear reason not answer questions.
It's long standing policy- policy that um may not uh be actually written down- it is my uh view of policy.
So basically you don't want to answer and you are just making shite up on why you don't want to answer. It's against a policy that probably doesn't exist.
It's long standing policy- policy that um may not uh be actually written down- it is my uh view of policy.
This post was edited on 6/13/17 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:05 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
wow dem accusing Sessions of obstructing.
were republicans just as pissy during the bengazhi stuff? granted...that did involve loss of life and a whole new scale
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:05 pm to cajunangelle
he is but he doesnt have the balls to call him on it officially. and as sessions has stated he has met with lawyers and his answers are sufficient. suck it heinrich.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:06 pm to cajunangelle
He is all about the gotchas from his note taking.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:06 pm to themunch
Comey's testimony on 3 May, 2017 on HRC is what led to his firing and an additional concern.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:07 pm to skullhawk
quote:
quote:
Senator Henrich lets his wife go chasing after the BBC on week nights.
He's the type of guy who would apologize to his wife for her cheating on him
I love the high quality of posts in this thread. I honestly feel like I'm watching this with a bunch of baws drunk on bud light making dumbass immature comments.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:07 pm to cajunangelle
Need Cliffs.
Is Trump soooooo done, again?
Is Trump soooooo done, again?
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:08 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
It's long standing policy- policy that um may not uh be actually written down- it is my uh view of policy.
So basically you don't want to answer and you are just making shite up on why you don't want to answer. It's against a policy that probably doesn't exist.
i'm going to bet that this is a legit policy of the DOJ and has been
it wouldn't make any sense otherwise
i mean the AG is the attorney for the US and represents the government. as a policy concern, why would we think the AG should be allowed to repeat private conversations with the President?
This post was edited on 6/13/17 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:08 pm to TigerBait1971
quote:
Need Cliffs.
The U.S. Senate is one of the worst collections of freaks, criminals and incompetents in the world today.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's long standing policy- policy that um may not uh be actually written down- it is my uh view of policy.
So basically you don't want to answer and you are just making shite up on why you don't want to answer. It's against a policy that probably doesn't exist.
It was certainly Eric Holders policy when it came to Fast and Furious, in which the DOJ basically ran guns to drug lords and Americans were killed due to it.
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:10 pm to TigerBait1971
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 6/13/17 at 3:11 pm to fouldeliverer
Sessions responses were congruent with proper protocol in reference to questions pertaining to what others 'think' or 'feel' in juxtaposition with testimony by Mr Comey which led to his confession of leaking private conversations with all including non professional associates that were told to share with the media.
Is that drunk or red neck enough for you?
Is that drunk or red neck enough for you?
This post was edited on 6/13/17 at 3:13 pm
Popular
Back to top



0









