
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wasn’t State Redistricting supposed to shore up a Red House?
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
10 is 2 hand fulls.
Proven wrong.
Plus 2 currently in the house.
Proven wrong.
Plus 2 currently in the house.
This post was edited on 10/30/26 at 11:07 am
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:12 am to Covingtontiger77
Gerrymandering is a risky bet. In order to maximize the number of seats you have to narrow your margin for error.
Drawing up 52-48 seats gives you more seats in a normal year. In a bad year they flip the other way.
Drawing up 52-48 seats gives you more seats in a normal year. In a bad year they flip the other way.

Popular
Back to top

0






