Started By
Message

re: Was Russia Promised that Nato Wouldnt Expand to the East on inch?

Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:51 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139056 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:51 am to
quote:

He never threatened to nuke Cuba or Russia.
That is false of course.

quote:

It shall be the policy of this Nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:51 am to
No.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Fortunately for Ukraine the west has said enough is enough and they are making Russia pay dearly this time.




You're a young guy, why don't you join and fight instead of cheerleading over Ukrainian bodies?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28183 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:57 am to
quote:

It shall be the policy of this Nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union.


I've made this point several times to one of the Zelensky-bro village idiots and got nothing but a "that's different" response.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
15766 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:03 pm to
Mearsheimer was a Bernie Bro. Far Leftist
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

And IIRC, Mearsheimer was one of the voices encouraging NATO expansion subsequent to Yeltsin's election.



John Mearsheimer was? That'd be surprising. Regardless, his principles of offensive realism shaped the Wolfowitz Doctrine and then the Bush Doctrine, which is what the US followed more or less since the end of the CW.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139056 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Your attempt to cherry pick 7 years of Russian history is actually comical.

Comical?

That is interesting.

What other years of Yeltsin's tenure as the first elected Russian President would you choose?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139056 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

his principles of offensive realism shaped the Wolfowitz Doctrine and then the Bush Doctrine, which is what the US followed more or less since the end of the CW.
Correct. Including during the Yeltsin years, which was our window to bring Russia into the fold, rather than exclude it.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24859 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

like Russia setting up shop in Indiana.


Or Chyna in DC. Oh, wait.
Posted by CarrolltonTiger
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2005
50291 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:28 pm to
I worked in the Former Soviet Empire from 1989 to 1995, with primarily the Interrregional Group of Deputies, and that article is bullshite of the Highest Order.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42649 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

You're a young guy, why don't you join and fight instead of cheerleading over Ukrainian bodies?


I admire the Ukrainians for standing up against a foreign invader and fighting for their independence. I supports their effort 100%; however, there are limits to my support.

I am way too old to be of much of a contributor on the battlefield despite your support. I’m willing to volunteer my tax dollars to a point though. I’ve seen Russia dominate and bully their neighbors. I’ve “hidden” under my desk in grade school in case Russia attacked. I don’t like of trust Russia whether they are led by Khrushchev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin or Putin.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139056 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

I worked in the Former Soviet Empire from 1989 to 1995, with primarily the Interrregional Group of Deputies
That must have been a hell of an interesting time.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42649 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

quote:He never threatened to nuke Cuba or Russia.That is false of course. quote:It shall be the policy of this Nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union.


He never threatened to nuke them first.
Certainly we all know that once we are attacked by nukes the gloves are off.
Posted by Beauw
Blanchard
Member since Sep 2007
4235 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Stranger Things have happened.


Well played
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139056 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

He never threatened to nuke them first.
Yeah, actually he did.

The USSR ceded local control to tactical nukes amidst the coastal batteries. We did not know those were in place. Nor were we aware of the C&C directives.

Had the US Navy encroached, and one or more of those shells fired in response without Kremlin orders, our "retaliation" would have comprised a first strike against the USSR.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

I am way too old to be of much of a contributor on the battlefield despite your support.


I would 100% support a national referendum on war and support of war where it would have to be voted on by the public, with majority approval, and every individual that votes for war has to be put on the lines to fight. That includes politicians, bureaucrats and sitting presidents.

People love cheerleader wars, but they cry like a baby when bullets fly around them, and want the war to end.
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 12:43 pm
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42649 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

He never threatened to nuke them first.Yeah, actually he did. The USSR ceded local control to tactical nukes amidst the coastal batteries. We did not know those were in place. Nor were we aware of the C&C directives. Had the US Navy encroached, and one or more of those shells fired in response without Kremlin orders, our "retaliation" would have comprised a first strike against the USSR.


Sure, after nukes were fired at our people.
JFK never said he’d fire first.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Correct. Including during the Yeltsin years, which was our window to bring Russia into the fold, rather than exclude it.



I'm really skeptical the degree to which Russia had market liberals who would have won the power struggle between right and left wings, both of whom had revanchist aspirations. That was the way forward with respect to integration, and Russia turned its back on that sort of integration many times.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139056 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Sure, after nukes were fired at our people.
But not from, or necessarily by, the USSR. Yet our retaliation would constitute a first strike against the USSR.

It just goes to show how quickly these things can get out of hand. The DoD focus was entirely on Cuban missiles.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 12:50 pm to
quote:


Sure, after nukes were fired at our people.
JFK never said he’d fire first.


We moved missiles into Turkey and tried to overthrow Cuba's government.

The truth is, you just accept the double standards.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram