Started By
Message

re: Was CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, etc. considered fake news before Trump?

Posted on 3/2/19 at 11:52 pm to
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
36963 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 11:52 pm to
Yes. But no Republican ever really took it on and called the press out for being dishonest or hypocritical for covering the right differently than the left.

But the most hilarious part is “fake news” was actually coined by journalists against Republicans. So they essentially labeled themselves
Posted by Pussykat
South Louisiana
Member since Oct 2016
3889 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 2:13 am to
No I don’t believe they were considered fake news before Trump. That was before they succumbed to TDS. They are so biased now, they are consumed with hate and jealousy. Have you ever considered the possibility that YOU are the brainwashed sheep?
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
48202 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 2:19 am to
You are singing in the shower and think you are ready for a broadway show.

You are not nearly as smart as you think you are.

Dumbest post of the week.
Posted by TGFN57
Telluride
Member since Jan 2010
6975 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 2:20 am to
Truth, when it isn't sailing 800 miles over their heads, will almost always alienate the willfully stupid.
Posted by 88Wildcat
Topeka, Ks
Member since Jul 2017
16593 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 8:28 am to
We should all chip in and buy the OP a copy of Bernard Goldberg's book "Bias." It's an approximately twenty year old book it shouldn't cost more than ten dollars or so by now.
Posted by themunch
bottom of the list
Member since Jan 2007
71367 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 8:39 am to
My answer the op is YES.
Posted by Lou the Jew from LSU
Member since Oct 2006
5247 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 8:41 am to
You sir, are an idiot.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55435 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 9:03 am to
Good lord.

Yeah, nobody was calling out "Journolist" before Trump.

Another mentally ill retard.

You did hit all the solid MSM talking points, though. I'll give you that. Definitely well programmed Proggy.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116822 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 9:04 am to
I realized that the MSM had a left wing slant back in 1965. I had no idea who Trump was back then.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
11680 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 9:09 am to
Journalism has always had some sort of taint to it.

There was the Yellow Journalism days back in the late 1800’s when newspapers were the only source for information. During these days the drum beat of the printing press led to the Spanish American War. It was called yellow because the paper was so cheap it turned yellow, and the stories printed were with the same style as the National Enquirer but on a local level.

Then back in the World War I, World War II, and Korean War days tight government control of the press censored or controlled news stories about the war could be considered propaganda.

In the early days of TV news, direct sponsorship of news (your Esso reporter) led to tight control as to what was said and how.

Then the graphic nature of the TV coverage of Vietnam led to the eventual end of the draft and the quagmire of the war.

Then the fever pitch coverage of the Watergate scandal and eventual resignation of Richard Nixon.

I could go on to modern day stuff because that is when it exploded once you started to have cable news, talk radio, and the internet once opinion replaced information in the media.

I will say this about modern journalism is when you have pundants talking about something about politics and they use the same code words or terminology to describe something or someone is what is troubling in today’s media environment.

This has been going on since the 1990’s. I would laugh my arse off when Rush would play a montage of these pundants or reporters saying the same thing almost verbatim. It kinda makes you wonder who is colluding with who.


This post was edited on 3/3/19 at 9:16 am
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94841 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 9:16 am to
quote:

CNN


Yes. Very fake news. As far back as the 90s, they were called "The Clinton News Network."

quote:

ABC


Yes.

quote:

NBC


Hell, yes. Their longtime anchorman, Tom Brokaw, was considered and vetted for the VP spot for Kerry in 2004 - while he was still the active anchor.

quote:

MSNBC


Possibly faker than CNN, but at least they make no bones about it.

quote:

Fox News


Least fake of the bunch, if you want to know the truth about it.
Posted by Upperaltiger06
North Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
4212 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 9:17 am to
Those outlets were able to control narratives through virtue signaling BT (before Trump). Call a conservative politician or proposal sexist/racist/evil and watch them backpedal to lose the label. Trump DNGAF. He brushes aside these criticisms. The left media isn’t used to that not working so they have moved from exaggeration to lying in their coverage. That’s why no one takes it seriously now. Their message is always predictable. Trump can do nothing right. Do you not see this?
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 9:39 am to
Yes
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52922 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 9:54 am to
MSNBC and CNN definitely were considered as such.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23952 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 9:57 am to
Yes. No one had the balls to call them out but yes they have been spewing a lot of false propaganda for years.

Dan Rather and the faked Bush performance review ring a bell?

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram