- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WaPo Outright Lie of a Headline: Transcript Shows QPQ
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:33 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:33 am to SlowFlowPro
and
'the walls are closing in around Trump'
'the noose is tightening around Trump's neck'
(Crossfire Hurricane) Comey/Mccabe's code operation for get Trump, was not in the mainstream yet.
and this one was all people needed to really see that the Democrats are the MSmedia.
'the walls are closing in around Trump'
'the noose is tightening around Trump's neck'
(Crossfire Hurricane) Comey/Mccabe's code operation for get Trump, was not in the mainstream yet.
and this one was all people needed to really see that the Democrats are the MSmedia.
0
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:34 am to HempHead
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/17/20 at 1:34 am
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:35 am to More&Les
quote:
Outright Lie of a Headline
every 3rd TD thread about dems.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:38 am to Rhino67
quote:
Trump said he would have Barr and Guiliani get in touch with him. That’s offering the assistance of two US officials.
Nothing about it implies a quid pro quo, however.
If you don't think that there are reasons for the DoJ to be at least slightly interested in the alleged actions that some actors have taken in Ukraine, then you are absolutely delusional.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:41 am to Rhino67
quote:
The cult of Trump is embarrassing to this country.
What's embarrassing is a Vice President threatening a country so that a prosecutor is fired, the very same prosecutor who was investigating the very company the VP's son was getting $83k/month from and then bragged about it on TV, yet people like you are more concerned with Trump wanting it investigated without interference.
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 11:44 am
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:46 am to Scruffy
“The other thing, there's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.”
It’s like YOU can’t even read
It’s like YOU can’t even read
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:49 am to More&Les
quote:Besides not being a transcript (which they correctly refer to as a memo in the headline), how is this a lie?
"Transcript.... Shows him offering US assistance for Biden Investigation"
Here is a direct quote from the memo:
quote:And another one:
I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to·the bottom of it.
quote:How else would describe "having the AG and Rudy call him so that WE can get to the bottom of it," and "whatever you can do WITH the AG" as anything but offering assistance?
a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great.
Now maybe having Rudy, as someone who outside of government, is a little unusual. However, merely offering the assistance of the AG, the head of the nation's department that investigates and enforces criminal laws, to help an investigation isn't a big deal in and of itself at all.
Regardless, I don't know how you can say that the article is a lie.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:53 am to Tiger5750
Hey Tiger5750, does it bother you at all that Joe Biden leveraged over a billion dollars of American taxpayer money to strong arm Ukraine into firing the prosecutor who was investigating his son? Does this bother you at all?
If it doesn't, you can join the enormous pile of Democrats who clearly have no principals. If this were about protecting our country, you would be demanding that Joe Biden drop out and be indicted for treason. But of course you wouldn't demand that, because this is all about power and politics. Nothing more.
If it doesn't, you can join the enormous pile of Democrats who clearly have no principals. If this were about protecting our country, you would be demanding that Joe Biden drop out and be indicted for treason. But of course you wouldn't demand that, because this is all about power and politics. Nothing more.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:54 am to HempHead
quote:True, but other than reporting on what the D's are saying about it, the article doesn't present the assistance as quid pro quo anyways.
Nothing about it implies a quid pro quo, however.
Regardless, the article's headline is accurate, and I'm not sure how the OP (or anyone else) can argue that it's inaccurate, let alone an outright lie.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:56 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
True, but other than reporting on what the D's are saying about it, the article doesn't present the assistance as quid pro quo anyways.
Then they should probably changed their LYING headline.
quote:
Regardless, the article's headline is accurate, and I'm not sure how the OP (or anyone else) can argue that it's inaccurate, let alone an outright lie.
Wait, wut? You just said that there wasn't a QPQ......the headline says their was
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:57 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
Regardless, I don't know how you can say that the article is a lie.
Because the allegation is trump offered aid in return for investigation.
The liars at the wapo are trying to deceive people into believing that happened.
But you knew that
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:58 am to Tiger5750
The derangement crew is embarrassing. Congrats.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:58 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
True, but other than reporting on what the D's are saying about it, the article doesn't present the assistance as quid pro quo anyways.
quote:
Regardless, the article's headline is accurate
Contradicted yourself in one post.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:58 am to TSmith
quote:This has about as much verifiable and objective evidence as Trump doing the same to investigate Biden.
Joe Biden leveraged over a billion dollars of American taxpayer money to strong arm Ukraine into firing the prosecutor who was investigating his son?
quote:It bothers me that people are making accusations as if they are an objective truth with evidence to support them, and that goes for the accusations against Trump and Biden.
Does this bother you at all?
Posted on 9/25/19 at 11:59 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
This has about as much verifiable and objective evidence as Trump doing the same to investigate Biden.
It’s not our fault your ignorance is informing your views.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 12:01 pm to Tiger5750
quote:
The only thing wrong with that headline is that it’s not a transcript - it’s a memo. It’s the best spin they could put on this call & it is very obviously a quid pro quo.
Look guys we got another alter to show up and spout bullshite… Is there a record for alters in one day?
Posted on 9/25/19 at 12:03 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
This has about as much verifiable and objective evidence as Trump doing the same to investigate Biden.
Did you answer for your alter? hmmm...
Posted on 9/25/19 at 12:04 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
This has about as much verifiable and objective evidence as Trump doing the same to investigate Biden.
Except our news media has declared one a conspiracy theory and the other an impeachable offense. The double standard is glaring.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 12:05 pm to Scruffy
quote:I didn't contradict myself. The article only shows that Trump offered assistance, and they only make claims regarding that.
Contradicted yourself in one post.
And what I was referring to in regards to quid pro quo is a direct quote from Schiff, who is obviously a hack, but he IS the chair of the House Intelligence Committee. But right before the quote, they note that the DOJ determined that the call did not violate campaign finance laws as well.
quote:It seems to me that both the DOJ's decision about the call, and the views of the leaders of the branch of government who is trying to use the call to impeach the president are both warranted in the story. And while Schiff's views may be wrong, they are still important to the story and directly quoting him does not imply anything about the veracity of his views.
While the Justice Department has concluded the call did not violate campaign finance law, a growing number of Democrats are pushing for impeachment, saying the president’s conduct — seeking a foreign country’s aid in discrediting a political rival — betrayed his oath of office and endangered national security. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, said the call “reads like a classic mob shakedown.”
Posted on 9/25/19 at 12:06 pm to The Maj
quote:Huh?
Did you answer for your alter? hmmm...
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News