Started By
Message

re: Wall Street Journal lamenting taxes aren't higher on billionaires

Posted on 2/18/26 at 8:15 pm to
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55573 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

Well if this is your concern, then we can put this to rest. They do pay taxes

Many pay very little.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41087 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 8:20 pm to
Incorrect.
Posted by DaBike
Member since Jan 2008
10554 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

The country has a spending problem, not a revenue problem.


And a corruption problem.
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2936 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 8:29 pm to
you're really going to be outraged but for the first 11 years in that business i could defer commissions roll them over year over year and access them as equity in my margin account and the only tax i would pay is on the short and long term profits in my investment account.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

WTF are you laughing at? That’s exactly what’s happening.


No it isn’t.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13525 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

Penrod


Thank you.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

I’m not typing it all up again. Read the thread if you’re interested. This is just to say the proposal is not about taxing all unrecognized gains, just those that are being borrowed against to avoid taxes.


It’s hilarious you think taking a loan means no taxes are ever paid by billionaires. You aren’t the brightest tax and estate planner I’ve run into.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

Deferred indefinitely. Past their lifetime and perhaps past their heirs’.


Laughably wrong. Where are you getting this BS?
This post was edited on 2/18/26 at 8:48 pm
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55573 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

It’s hilarious you think taking a loan means no taxes are ever paid by billionaires.

I never implied that. I am saying that SOME billionaires are able to defer paying capital gains or income taxes for many years by taking loans against their securities. This is a well known phenomena. It’s not something I’m bringing to the table. It’s something I’ve read about several times, and taxing those loans as capital gains is being considered by think tanks currently. But you keep giggling, you!
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13525 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

He does not want to sell shares because he would have to pay capital gains.


But he does sell shares. He buys and sells. He doesn't just keep every stock he buys indefinitely. Right? Otherwise he wouldn't be maximizing the potential of his investments. He realizes gains just like everyone does.

And when he does that, he pays taxes just like everyone does.

quote:

The proposed tax would be that the $10million he got in year one would trigger a 21% “capital gains equivalence” tax.


But it wouldn't be a capital gains equivalence tax. It would be a tax on a loan. How do they figure what triggers that?

You talk about being fair, but I don't have to pay taxes on a loan I take out as though it was income. Why should a billionaire?

I get that a teacher making $70,000 a year can't do that, but not because the tax code treats him differently.



Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41087 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

This is a well misunderstood phenomena


Fify
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55573 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

you're really going to be outraged but for the first 11 years in that business i could defer commissions roll them over year over year and access them as equity in my margin account and the only tax i would pay is on the short and long term profits in my investment account

I’m not outraged a bit. Glad you took advantage of the avoidance schemes available to your industry. I did in mine. Mainly it was R&D tax credits. What a scam! We had huge deductions for these and nothing we did should have been called R&D. But a third party consultant did the audit and suggested the tax credits. We just signed off.

There is another discussion to be had about these perks to industries and labor. They should all be gotten rid of because they distort the market. And while I would be the worse off for the elimination of those that helped me, I’d be better off on balance. And that’s the way government intervention usually works. But that is not this discussion.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

I never implied that. I am saying that SOME billionaires are able to defer paying capital gains or income taxes for many years by taking loans against their securities. This is a well known phenomena. It’s not something I’m bringing to the table. It’s something I’ve read about several times, and taxing those loans as capital gains is being considered by think tanks currently. But you keep giggling, you!


You said they could delay paying taxes almost indefinitely. Even after their death and even after their heirs deaths. This is just flat out wrong. You clearly have very little understanding of how exemptions, estate tax, and GSTT work. You speak with hubris from a place of complete ignorance. Amazing.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55573 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:16 pm to
From AI
quote:

Deemed realization tax on loans is a proposed policy targeting the "buy-borrow-die" strategy, where investors borrow against appreciated assets to access cash tax-free without selling, thereby avoiding capital gains taxes.

This approach treats loan proceeds as a taxable "realization event" up to the amount of unrealized gains, effectively taxing loans as income to close tax loopholes.

Key Aspects of Taxing Loans as Income/Deemed Realization: The "Buy-Borrow-Die" Loophole: Currently, the wealthy can borrow against appreciated assets, accessing cash without triggering taxable income, as loans are not considered income by the IRS.

The Proposal: Proposed by experts, this policy treats borrowing as a "deemed realization" event, forcing the recognition of capital gains when loans are taken against appreciated assets. Preventing Double Taxation: To avoid taxing the same gain twice, the cost basis of the assets used as collateral would be reset to fair market value after the tax is paid. Mechanism:

Tax is generally triggered on loans if they exceed the cost basis of the assets, often calculated on a first-in-first-out basis. Current Tax Status: Generally, loan proceeds are not taxable income because they must be repaid. However, if a loan is forgiven or cancelled, the forgiven amount is treated as taxable income.

This proposed tax reform aims to ensure that using, borrowing against, and dying with appreciated assets (without ever selling them) does not allow for a permanent escape from capital gains tax.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55573 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

You said they could delay paying taxes almost indefinitely. Even after their death and even after their heirs deaths. This is just flat out wrong. You clearly have very little understanding of how exemptions, estate tax, and GSTT work. You speak with hubris from a place of complete ignorance. Amazing.

Read what I just. posted from AI.

AI must have hubris, too.
This post was edited on 2/18/26 at 9:18 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

Read what I just. posted from AI.


Again. You’re posting with hubris from a place of complete ignorance. They may avoid capital gains because of the step-up in basis. That’s a 20 percent savings. And you only get the step-up on assets includible in your estate. Your AI generated post doesn’t address estate tax or GSTT. Those are a 40 percent tax rate. Again….you could not be more wrong about billionaires avoiding taxes for generations.


quote:

AI must have hubris, too.


you fricking moron. You don’t know what you don’t know.
This post was edited on 2/18/26 at 9:22 pm
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41087 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

From AI


Not sure what you think that is showing to refute my claim that it is a misunderstood phenomena or that it is incorrect many pay very little. In fact, it further solidifies that claim.

This post was edited on 2/18/26 at 9:37 pm
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41087 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

Your AI generated post doesn’t address estate tax or GSTT. Those are a 40 percent tax rate. Again….you could not be more wrong about billionaires avoiding taxes for generations.


Hell, it doesn’t address taxes already paid on the issuance of those assets (company stock which is generally what these claims are referring to).
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Hell, it doesn’t address taxes already paid on the issuance of those assets (company stock which is generally what these claims are referring to).


He isn’t aware of the estate tax or GSTT. No way he understands NSOs and RSUs.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41087 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 9:38 pm to
He already admitted on the last page he didn’t understand anything about it, but that didn’t stop him
This post was edited on 2/18/26 at 9:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram