- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Verdict has been reached in the Kim Potter trial...UPDATE: Guilty
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:01 pm to shel311
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:01 pm to shel311
Watch the video retard.
You are going down a dangerous road with your retarded line of thinking and you can’t see.
This is a civil matter and not a criminal one.
You are just too dumb to see it.
You are going down a dangerous road with your retarded line of thinking and you can’t see.
This is a civil matter and not a criminal one.
You are just too dumb to see it.
1
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:01 pm to L1C4
Pathetic that she was found guilty. The actual criminal was the problem here, not the cop.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:10 pm to jclem11
quote:It's very dangerous and retarded to go by the actual law!!!
You are going down a dangerous road with your retarded line of thinking and you can’t see.
quote:You're wrong, in literally every way with that comment.
This is a civil matter and not a criminal one.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:12 pm to shel311
You can’t engage with the material. There is no conversation here. You are just wrong.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:14 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
I'm so tired of vehicles being classified as a deadly weapon
Care to ask someone to try it with you involved? I would not. Ever heard of “Nice” France? Probably not. You’re most likely not informed and just vote to hate others.
This post was edited on 12/23/21 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:16 pm to jclem11
quote:It doesn't have to be intentional, that is the law, and you keep sticking to saying it has to be intentional. And you're too afraid to respond to that and have ignored that about 10 times.
You can’t engage with the material. There is no conversation here. You are just wrong.
You simply are pretending for the sake of what you want to believe is true and ignoring the parts that make you unequivocally wrong.
You also seem to think no one in the history of the world before this cop has ever been convicted of a crime nor should they be convicted of a crime for making a mistake, so you may want to ease up on all the name calling
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:18 pm to shel311
You are being dishonest and won’t engage the material.
I’m speaking of this case and only this case.
I’m under no delusion that this is the first or only bad verdict.
I’m speaking of this case and only this case.
I’m under no delusion that this is the first or only bad verdict.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:20 pm to jclem11
quote:What I stated was factual
You are being dishones
quote:Says the guy who continues to ignore the part he doesn't want to believe, the law.
and won’t engage the material.
quote:Cool, this case, the one where you factually can be convicted for a mistake.
I’m speaking of this case and only this case
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:22 pm to shel311
I’m saying the state did not meet their burden based on the evidence at trial.
I watched the entire trial. You admitted you watched none.
I have a high bar for the state locking someone in a cage.
I watched the entire trial. You admitted you watched none.
I have a high bar for the state locking someone in a cage.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:29 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:a snack bar in Nice france killed like 100 people with a truck. Are you a retard or something? Of course a vehicle is a deadly weapon
I'm so tired of vehicles being classified as a deadly weapon.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:38 pm to L1C4
They’ll find her guilty to please the animals circling her carcass and the appeal and win with no one hearing about it.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 5:56 pm to chili pup
quote:
I hope you need the police one day and they are a little too late
I hope if I need the police, the 99 percent who are competent are the ones who show up.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 6:02 pm to shel311
quote:
Judge Regina Chu decided she will instruct the jury that recklessness in first-degree manslaughter requires "proof of a conscious or intentional act... that creates a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the actor is aware of and disregards."
Based on the evidence at the trial the state did not meet their burden of proof on this element. Thus she is not guilty.
As I have repeatedly stated, take this case to civil court and get damages for wrongful death.
The criminal liability is not there based on the evidence at trial.
You can disagree with me but not because I am "ignoring the parts I don't like".
The state did not meet their burden in this case. It's that simple.
This post was edited on 12/23/21 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 12/23/21 at 6:48 pm to jclem11
quote:
recklessness in first-degree manslaughter requires "proof of a conscious or intentional act... that creates a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the actor is aware of and disregards."
Will any of the “it doesn’t have to be intentional or they don’t have to know they are doing it to be reckless” people address this? Was the judge wrong in her instructions to the jury? How could they conclude she knowingly did this?
Posted on 12/23/21 at 6:50 pm to Dawgfanman
shel311 and LSUFanHouston didn't even watch the trial and have super strong opinions.
I watched the entire trial with Rekieta and crew.
ETA: They won't engage with it either b/c it proves them wrong.
I watched the entire trial with Rekieta and crew.
ETA: They won't engage with it either b/c it proves them wrong.
This post was edited on 12/23/21 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 12/23/21 at 7:03 pm to shel311
quote:
They didn't need to.
They needed to prove that she conciously disregarded his safety with her recklessness and culpable negligence. This isn't a strict liability offense. Not many criminal offenses are.
This should have been handled in civil court.
Either you know that and are being obtuse, or you don't know the law.
Either way, the jury of her peers judged her guilty. It's a travesty.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 7:04 pm to KosmoCramer
I am sick to my stomach.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 7:12 pm to KosmoCramer
Shel is an uninformed coward who admitted he did not watch the trial but has very strong opinions.
He embodies everything wrong with our society now.
Uninformed idiots with super strong takes.
He will never appear in this thread to admit he is wrong.
He embodies everything wrong with our society now.
Uninformed idiots with super strong takes.
He will never appear in this thread to admit he is wrong.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 7:13 pm to shel311
quote:
It's very dangerous and retarded to go by the actual law!!!
That’s frequently true.
Posted on 12/23/21 at 7:14 pm to jclem11
Rekeita Take on the Verdict
Shel and LSUFanHouston, both of you should watch this so you can learn some more about MN law.
You are both wrong with your takes and refuse to admit it.
Come eat your crow and take your L, cowards.
Shel and LSUFanHouston, both of you should watch this so you can learn some more about MN law.
You are both wrong with your takes and refuse to admit it.
Come eat your crow and take your L, cowards.
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News