re: Vance confirms Tucker would support Al Sayed over Roger’s

quote:

---

one foot in, one foot out campaign as the VP of a lame duck president.

---

quote:

---

You are delusional. Your gaslighting only works on your fellow TDS idiots.

---

quote:

---

No, it is not accurate to say Tucker Carlson endorsed Abdul El-Sayed. He did not endorse him. Full stop. What actually happened in the exchange: • Carlson stated he would not vote for Mike Rogers “at gunpoint.” • He called Rogers a “tool of Israel and the intelligence agencies” and said no one should be farther from a position of power. • He agreed with Saagar Enjeti that El-Sayed’s campaign messaging is “America First” and “literally Trumpian” (focusing on the framing around foreign aid, healthcare costs, and American-flag optics). • Both predicted El-Sayed would win. That is strong, public opposition to the Republican nominee combined with praise for specific tactical/messaging aspects of the Democrat’s campaign. It is not an endorsement of El-Sayed as a candidate, his overall platform, or a recommendation that people vote for him. Phrases like “basically endorses” or “all but endorses” are interpretive spin. They are common in media and social-media posts because they generate stronger reactions than the more precise description: Carlson trashed the Republican and found the Democrat’s current campaign style relatively appealing on certain foreign-policy and populist points. Those weasel words compress opposition-to-one-candidate + selective praise of the other into something that sounds closer to affirmative support than the transcript supports. Enjeti himself still described El-Sayed as “a full-blown leftist” in the same conversation, which undercuts any claim that either of them was treating him as an ideological ally. Carlson’s comments fit his long-standing pattern of criticizing establishment/pro-Israel Republicans more harshly than he criticizes certain anti-interventionist or populist messaging from other directions. That pattern is real; an actual endorsement is not. The original post and headlines that framed it as an endorsement (qualified or otherwise) overstated the evidence. The accurate summary is: Carlson made clear he rejects Rogers and sees political upside in El-Sayed’s current campaign approach.??????????????????????????????????????????????????

---

quote:

---

No. Tucker Carlson did not say “American whites.” The actual quote from his interview with Piers Morgan is approximately: “Pakistanis are all super nice to me and the whites are all kind of craven and sad.” This was said while discussing whether he felt threatened walking around London. He was describing his personal experiences there (hospitality from Pakistanis he encountered versus the demeanor of certain white people in that setting, often linked in the broader conversation to secular liberal elites). The original X post (and some others circulating the clip) added the framing “over white Americans” or “prefers… over white Americans.” That is an interpretive gloss, not what Carlson said. He used the more general “the whites” / “White people” in a UK context.??????????????????????????????????????????????????

---

quote:

---

over Roger’s

---