4
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: VA Gov Abagail Spanberger's new parole board releasing felons at alarming rate.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:17 am to 4cubbies
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:17 am to 4cubbies
I posted an on-topic response to the OP asking about convictions. The responses to my question include: You want attention, I hope someone murders your kids, something about Sandra Bland, name decent Democrat governors or senators.
What is this place?
What is this place?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:22 am to 4cubbies
quote:
The responses to my question include.......... something about Sandra Bland
Why do you lie about such easily proven things? I didn’t respond to your random arse question. I responded to your claim that you think critically with an example of you doing anything but thinking critically.
Why can’t you simply state facts rather than twist things into some false emotional narrative and try to act like a perpetual victim?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:25 am to 4cubbies
Let me break it down for you: your replies on most topics generally involve emotional arguments or fringe, irrelevant rationale AND you are a Leftist. Those two points alone cause any clear thinking person to immediately dismiss your arguments. Personally, you are probably a decent person but you are extremely naive, almost childlike. Hope this helps!
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:25 am to 4cubbies
quote:
posted an on-topic response to the
No you didn't you posted about a law in Louisiana when the topic was about violent convicted felon being paroled in Virginia. You were trying to steer the conversation away from a issue that you had no rebuttal for
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:43 am to Rip Torner
quote:
Let me break it down for you: your replies on most topics generally involve emotional arguments or fringe, irrelevant rationale AND you are a Leftist.
I literally asked what the convictions were. What is ideological about that?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:46 am to SOSFAN
quote:
No you didn't you posted about a law in Louisiana when the topic was about violent convicted felon being paroled in Virginia. You were trying to steer the conversation away from a issue that you had no rebuttal for
I asked what the convictions were. I posted an example of felony in the state in which I live that doesn’t elicit a visceral response to demonstrate that there are varying levels of felonies and “felon” doesn’t automatically mean violent.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:49 am to 4cubbies
quote:
literally asked what the convictions were. What is ideological about that?
They were literally in the OP's first post. You knew you didn't have a rebuttal for the actual thread so you acted like you didn't have a clue so you could steer the conversation into something you could debate. If you were forced to only discuss the actual thread you wouldn't even enter into the discussion
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:53 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I asked what the convictions were. I
You didn't need to ask because they were in the first post of the thread. So either you knew you had no way to debate the issue or you don't have the ability to understand reading comprehension.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:57 am to SOSFAN
They aren’t in the OP. I don’t utilize Twitter. OP expected people to watch a video instead of supplying any information about the content of the video. I asked for information about the content of the video.
I asked a question about the OP. You’re fussing at me for asking a question about the Tweet and you’re calling that derailing the thread.
quote:hold up, you’re this perturbed that I asked a question about the content of the video that you’re lecturing me across multiple posts about derailing the OP while condoning all the extremely emotional and hateful responses to me that have nothing to do with the content of the video.
If you were forced to only discuss the actual thread you wouldn't even enter into the discussion
I asked a question about the OP. You’re fussing at me for asking a question about the Tweet and you’re calling that derailing the thread.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:57 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I posted an on-topic response to the OP asking about convictions.
And the proof was in the news coverage in the OP.
Asked and answered.
Football is on in a few, that's enough crazy for the rest of the day.
quote:
OP expected people to watch a video instead of supplying any information about the content of the video.
Yes. I do not need to transcribe a damn video because you are too lazy to watch it or refuse to use X. That is you problem, toots.
This post was edited on 10/3/26 at 11:02 am
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:01 am to 4cubbies
quote:
These are people who were convicted of murder, rape, robbery and child abuse. Many of them had decades left on their life sentences
Why lie?
I'm not perturbed about anything you try. I actually find it humorous to watch you try to avoid the actual discussion, which you fail miserably at.
You have now been told, more than once, what the convictions were for and have yet tried to even discussing them. Your attempt to make this about you is extremely naive but you do you.
This post was edited on 10/3/26 at 11:03 am
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:08 am to BoomerandSooner
I personally feel that those being paroled should have to live with members of the parole board in their house.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:10 am to BoomerandSooner
Castro emptying his prisons comes to mind.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:11 am to SOSFAN
quote:I guess I can ask you the same question.
Why lie?
quote:LINK
You have now been told, more than once, what the convictions were for and have yet tried to even discussing them
Anyone formulating a non-emotional response would have to know the details of each individual crime and conviction to evaluate whether or not parole is justified. I seem to be the only person who actually tried to do that.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:14 am to el Gaucho
quote:
I’m failing to see the problem with purse snatching being a felony
You are primed to have your purse snatched! When it does happen like all liberals, you will call for the police you canceled, cry how outrageous they are for taking so long, and lastly blame everyone but yourself. You will feel exploited and unsafe for possible years. You'll be afraid to go anywhere and will end up on forums crying about how you had your purse snatched. Yet, you will keep defending liberals no matter how bad your life gets. That's not even sad anymore its just not interesting.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:18 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Anyone formulating a non-emotional response would have to know the details of each individual crime and conviction to evaluate whether or not parole is justified. I seem to be the only person who actually tried to do that.
quote:
condoning all the extremely emotional and hateful responses to me that have nothing to do with the content of the video.
quote:
Why lie?
I guess I can ask you the same question.
You could but it would have to be made up
All you have is emotions. So why do you feel, that it could be ok, for a violent offender including murder to be paroled and not do the time they were sentenced to
This post was edited on 10/3/26 at 11:20 am
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:24 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I don’t know the nuances of each offender or conviction.
So you need to know the "nuances of each offender or conviction" before you can make a decision on whether or not releasing violent criminals is a good idea or not?
While it stances in the nobility of wanting to make sure you are making the correct call, for being so far removed from the situation it actually falls under the Nirvana Fallacy (especially since you aren't willing to do the very work you want done to make a decision). It's either that you are hiding behind a bad-faith rhetorical practice of requiring an unreasonable burden of proof before making even a general assessment or you suffer from "paralysis from analysis" (the inability to make a decision for fear of making a wrong choice).
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:27 am to roadGator
I have completely stopped any type of response to a cubbie post
She is irredeemably stupid
She is irredeemably stupid
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:27 am to Rip Torner
quote:
Absolutely! Virginia voters fell for the awe shucks I am a folksy moderate just like Texas voters are with Talerico.
No, Virginia politics are dominated by Beltway DC liberal voters.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:42 am to Bard
quote:
So you need to know the "nuances of each offender or conviction" before you can make a decision on whether or not releasing violent criminals is a good idea or not?
YES! I need to check the government’s work before I blindly support it.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News