- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Houston, TX |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | Jesus |
| Occupation: | Love God! |
| Number of Posts: | 603 |
| Registered on: | 1/8/2011 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
but I can whole heartedly agree that a better scheme is possible and would help.
Look when you set-up your team to fail, unless there is an extremely exceptional player they will fail. Some coaches don't understand they are there to place players up to succeed according to their talent not force them into a box of how we run plays!
quote:
Outside of the Nuss injury, the players weren't really the problem for the most part this season. Twas the coaching and scheme.
How true! They sacked us 7 times we hurried their QB twice resulting in 2 pickoffs! When a QB is allowed time defenses lose every single time!
quote:
There are a handful of powerbrokers arranging this and they can always find the money.
We wonder why ticket prices and tuition are skyrocketing!
quote:
Yep, a lot of these "Dumb as Louisiana Swamp Muck" Ranters are still Drunk and/or High from the weekend. Even the ones that can actually read, would be mentally taxed trying to read all that.
What the hell? Stop your sauce! I'm just offering a direct point for those who dont want the details!
re: Here's Why Kelly is Relieved! (ADHD'ers read the last 2 paragraphs)
Posted by rbm1 on 10/27/25 at 2:01 pm to Mobiletiggah
quote:
really obvious was A&M had an advantage from the beginning of that game with speed and agility at the offensive skilled positions.
Sure they were fast but so were we. 2 pick-offs proved we matched their skilled. The fact we only had one spy underestimated their QB running abilities not to mention zero sacks! ZERO! This kept their offense on the field along with out Defenses. A sure bet way to lose any football game. Zero adjustments to say the least!
re: I MADE A CHART TO HELP FACILIATE BETTER AND MORE PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS
Posted by rbm1 on 10/27/25 at 1:05 am to TchoupitoulasTiger
Your percentages of LSU likelihood of obtaining these coaches are pure speculation. But love your other numbers! Great Job!
Kiffin - (family loves Oxford!)
Lea
Kiffin - (family loves Oxford!)
Lea
Here's Why Kelly is Relieved! (ADHD'ers read the last 2 paragraphs)
Posted by rbm1 on 10/27/25 at 12:50 am
When a new exceptional running back talent, such as Berry, consistently demonstrates their ability with every touch, it is imperative to continue utilizing him. LSU total rushing yards, 60yds (59 Berry) A&M 224yds
If the aforementioned running back successfully advances the team into the end zone on a subsequent play, it is counterproductive to then cease their involvement.
When Berry is designated for an inside run but identifies no viable path due to the inexperience of two freshman offensive linemen, and subsequently moves outside to score, it is illogical to persist with inside runs when an outside option is available. How about a pitch-out?
When your quarterback is consistently being sacked, (7-44yds) it is ill-advised to continue calling deep-developing pass plays. Instead, quick, short passes should be prioritized.
When your quarterback is injured, it is not prudent to repeatedly call bootleg plays. Instead, plays designed for quick ball release or running plays should be implemented.
When your team is trailing by a score of 49 to 18, it is inappropriate to reinsert your injured starting quarterback to attempt another long-developing pass, only to result in another sack.
I know most will blame Nussmeier for this failure but I pointed out evidence that this game wasn't blown by the players in this game, it was all coaching including the special teams coach!
We had too many 3-and-outs (3-13) which keeps our defense on the field way too long and that is exactly what happened to our great Tiger Defense!
If you can decipher football plays from the players you'll discover that 80% of the problem is the coaches not the players!
Considering Brian Kelly could not see this and change the offensive strategy after the first 3-and-out, tells me he is probably more relieved over his dismissal than anyone else!
If the aforementioned running back successfully advances the team into the end zone on a subsequent play, it is counterproductive to then cease their involvement.
When Berry is designated for an inside run but identifies no viable path due to the inexperience of two freshman offensive linemen, and subsequently moves outside to score, it is illogical to persist with inside runs when an outside option is available. How about a pitch-out?
When your quarterback is consistently being sacked, (7-44yds) it is ill-advised to continue calling deep-developing pass plays. Instead, quick, short passes should be prioritized.
When your quarterback is injured, it is not prudent to repeatedly call bootleg plays. Instead, plays designed for quick ball release or running plays should be implemented.
When your team is trailing by a score of 49 to 18, it is inappropriate to reinsert your injured starting quarterback to attempt another long-developing pass, only to result in another sack.
I know most will blame Nussmeier for this failure but I pointed out evidence that this game wasn't blown by the players in this game, it was all coaching including the special teams coach!
We had too many 3-and-outs (3-13) which keeps our defense on the field way too long and that is exactly what happened to our great Tiger Defense!
If you can decipher football plays from the players you'll discover that 80% of the problem is the coaches not the players!
Considering Brian Kelly could not see this and change the offensive strategy after the first 3-and-out, tells me he is probably more relieved over his dismissal than anyone else!
re: Media is Back to Old Polls Games & SEC Pays the Price!
Posted by rbm1 on 9/15/25 at 3:00 pm to TheRouxGuru
It's a forum called Rant Dumbass! No one is worried and the only one freaking out is you. Take a chill pill and move on little buddy. I'm not the press and you're not Coach Kelly. Life is good, now go eat your fruitcake and be right with the world...again!
Oh I know the BCS had flaws but they weren't in the hands of northeastern and west media pinheads.
The problem, in my humble opinion, was they allowed too many computers in, thinking they couldn't be flawed! Well, all anyone had to do at the time was research where the algorithms were created and it proved serious bias from their area! LOL! If LSU was generally accepted as #1 these so called unbiased algorithms would have them at #20 and some obscured team was placed up towards the top! LOL! After research we would find it's some nerdy kid (or old guy) in his mom's basement in the northeast! LOL! This was consistent to all computer polls and not one was unbiased! LOL!
Me personally am sick and tired for our media running the brainwashing scams they refer to as social engineering but we call propaganda. Let the kid in the basement have it if just to keep the media pinheads thinking they are more credential they that kid! Besides, I do a better job at the polls myself and guess who is at the top of my poll? Geaux Tigers!
The problem, in my humble opinion, was they allowed too many computers in, thinking they couldn't be flawed! Well, all anyone had to do at the time was research where the algorithms were created and it proved serious bias from their area! LOL! If LSU was generally accepted as #1 these so called unbiased algorithms would have them at #20 and some obscured team was placed up towards the top! LOL! After research we would find it's some nerdy kid (or old guy) in his mom's basement in the northeast! LOL! This was consistent to all computer polls and not one was unbiased! LOL!
Me personally am sick and tired for our media running the brainwashing scams they refer to as social engineering but we call propaganda. Let the kid in the basement have it if just to keep the media pinheads thinking they are more credential they that kid! Besides, I do a better job at the polls myself and guess who is at the top of my poll? Geaux Tigers!
Media is Back to Old Polls Games & SEC Pays the Price!
Posted by rbm1 on 9/15/25 at 11:24 am
It appears we are revisiting a familiar topic. Relying on media polls, which often prioritize viewership over accurate rankings, can lead to skewed perceptions.
Each statistical number next to the ranked team reflects the true strength of a team's schedule, specifically the number of top 25 teams they face. On average, an SEC team competes against 5.6 top 25 opponents, while teams from other conferences face only 1.9. This disparity in competition is often overlooked, and it may even be used to downplay the challenges SEC teams face in achieving success.
This is why I assert that the BCS played a pivotal role in establishing the SEC as a financial powerhouse in collegiate athletics.
1 OH St. - 4
2 PSU - 3
3 LSU - 6 (SEC)
4 Mia - 3
5 UGA - 6 (SEC)
6 ORE - 3
7 FSU - 2
8 TX - 5 (SEC)
9 ILL - 3
10 TX A&M - 5 (SEC)
11 OU - 8 (SEC)
12 ISU - 1
13 Miss - 3 (SEC)
14 AL - 7 (SEC)
15 Tenn - 4 (SEC)
16 Utal - 1
17 TTU - 1
18 GT - 2
19 IU - 3
20 Van - 7 (SEC)
21 Mich - 3
22 Aub - 6 ((SEC)
23 Miz - 5 (SEC)
24 ND - 3
25 USC - 4
Each statistical number next to the ranked team reflects the true strength of a team's schedule, specifically the number of top 25 teams they face. On average, an SEC team competes against 5.6 top 25 opponents, while teams from other conferences face only 1.9. This disparity in competition is often overlooked, and it may even be used to downplay the challenges SEC teams face in achieving success.
This is why I assert that the BCS played a pivotal role in establishing the SEC as a financial powerhouse in collegiate athletics.
1 OH St. - 4
2 PSU - 3
3 LSU - 6 (SEC)
4 Mia - 3
5 UGA - 6 (SEC)
6 ORE - 3
7 FSU - 2
8 TX - 5 (SEC)
9 ILL - 3
10 TX A&M - 5 (SEC)
11 OU - 8 (SEC)
12 ISU - 1
13 Miss - 3 (SEC)
14 AL - 7 (SEC)
15 Tenn - 4 (SEC)
16 Utal - 1
17 TTU - 1
18 GT - 2
19 IU - 3
20 Van - 7 (SEC)
21 Mich - 3
22 Aub - 6 ((SEC)
23 Miz - 5 (SEC)
24 ND - 3
25 USC - 4
re: Illegal Syrian stabs numerous people in Austria. Kills 14 year old.
Posted by rbm1 on 2/15/25 at 3:28 pm to Night Vision
In 2007 Glenn Beck on Fox quoted a Iman, "We will conquer the world through our wombs!" Warning us about bringing Muslims to our land. He was fired from Fox soon after. This is a much deeper and bigger plan then anyone comprehends. America we are the frog in boiling water!
Why say both sides? Let's just rudeout the bad corruption no matter where we find it! Oh If you want to include democrats liberals and RINO'S I'm cool with that. But stop thinking both sides are parties, it's good against evil!
Yes we do! We were duped just like all the other RINOS! Now we need to get him out!
Follow The Money!
Posted by rbm1 on 2/6/25 at 3:19 pm
Follow the USAID money! Project 2025 is working and all because Trump woke up about politics but mostly from the evil democrats infiltration of everything in the "We The People's" country.
It they expose everything we will see the payouts to organizers for the 2020 riots, the mass immigrations here and all the attached string money passed out to control every liberal cause. We need thousands of auditors in there for months to find out where the arteries of corruption ran. I believe unfortunately what we have heard is only the beginning.
What a contrast from the 2016 Trump! When he announced he was going to work with the democrats and wouldn't even fire Comer of the FBI, who was already working against him as with all the bureaucrats he did not fire on day one!
It they expose everything we will see the payouts to organizers for the 2020 riots, the mass immigrations here and all the attached string money passed out to control every liberal cause. We need thousands of auditors in there for months to find out where the arteries of corruption ran. I believe unfortunately what we have heard is only the beginning.
What a contrast from the 2016 Trump! When he announced he was going to work with the democrats and wouldn't even fire Comer of the FBI, who was already working against him as with all the bureaucrats he did not fire on day one!
Accountable Silence
Posted by rbm1 on 2/6/25 at 4:07 am
Regarding the USAID scandal, the lack of public discussion regarding those who authorized these fraudulent activities is concerning. A thorough investigation should identify and hold accountable all parties involved, including those who requested, approved, and implemented these misappropriations of taxpayer funds.
This pattern of accountability failures mirrors other scandals, where culpability remains elusive. Similar to the recent protests, while the press secretary decried the actions as reprehensible and highlighted the potential for stronger reactions had a different party been involved, concrete actions such as naming names and calling for arrests are absent. This lack of decisive action is unacceptable.
This pattern of accountability failures mirrors other scandals, where culpability remains elusive. Similar to the recent protests, while the press secretary decried the actions as reprehensible and highlighted the potential for stronger reactions had a different party been involved, concrete actions such as naming names and calling for arrests are absent. This lack of decisive action is unacceptable.
quote:
What I want is for him to run and pick up a first down when the receivers are covered and the field is wide open in front of him.
What you see as covered doesn't mean it's true. As a pocket passer he can go run but why when he can pass further that he can run?
re: CBS 60 minutes
Posted by rbm1 on 11/2/24 at 4:25 am to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Im 63, and I never watch network news
Ditto!
All you did was prove my point these people, if you wanna refer them to people. I like to stay in the truth by calling then evil because they have betrayed our country more than any politician by picking a side in our politics.
To think a billionaire, it's gonna rescue the American media.
As the old saying goes, I got some swamp land to sell you.
Yes, we should stay in the course don't pay for crap so they can continue to make more of it.
However we all must go beyond the purse we need to get involved.
I haven't watched 60 Minutes as long as I have purchased a newspapers. Late 1980's?
They social engineered Americans straight to hell if we don't wake up to theirs propaganda!
To think a billionaire, it's gonna rescue the American media.
As the old saying goes, I got some swamp land to sell you.
Yes, we should stay in the course don't pay for crap so they can continue to make more of it.
However we all must go beyond the purse we need to get involved.
I haven't watched 60 Minutes as long as I have purchased a newspapers. Late 1980's?
They social engineered Americans straight to hell if we don't wake up to theirs propaganda!
quote:
When people quit watching those shite shows ... things will change.
I used to think that way when I was younger too. So let me tell you what happened to make me realized how what you said is false.
A company brought Newsweek magazine and only had to pay $1 to buy them. That company was a very conservative one in it's hay day when liberals couldn't compete they would just buy you. Decades later their platforms were just a propaganda machined.
The sold for $1 becuase the buying company had to pay off the million dollar debt Newsweek and a crude just because they refused to change their losing idealogy. This means they would rather run a company into the ground then change their ideology. That's antithetical to a business.
To think by not buy there product will not be enough. Complaing to thier regulatory agencies will serve our cause better.
quote:
He refuses to scramble even when the field is wide open in front of him.
Nuss first INT was from your desire to scramble. Our defense finally placed a spy on Reed and he got nothing after that defensive move.
Running QB's don't succeed long-term because they think run 1st and usually get hurt. Running QB's used to be an easy alternative to turn to in college because defenses didn't know how to defend against them. But today just place a spy on them and then they are forced to be a pocket passer!
quote:
Nuss ain’t for us
Don't include me with that !
Popular
1












