- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/8/26 at 4:57 pm to sgallo3
TDS is real, and Obama is a racist trader.
Posted on 5/8/26 at 4:57 pm to FlyDownTheField83
quote:Joe Kent is a TDS-eaten imbecil.
Are you saying you don’t care what Joe Kent has to say or,….
There is zero debate about that fact.
So FlyDownTheField83, the real question is, "Are you saying you actually care what Joe Kent has to say?"
This post was edited on 5/8/26 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 5/8/26 at 4:58 pm to BBONDS25
None of these idiots know about uranium enrichment, and they were not alive when Israel was bombing these centrifuges in the 80s
Posted on 5/8/26 at 4:59 pm to Bunk Moreland
And the concept of Iran furiously and immediately seeking to rebuild their nuclear facilities and related capabilities is just that outlandish to y’all? Very strange. What makes y’all believe so strenuously that after Midnight Hammer that Iran’s fanatical rulers would just throw their hands up in defeat and give up, thereby giving off a very strong sense of weakness, which from what I understand they don’t much care to do.
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:01 pm to sgallo3
quote:
So we knew all this but needed a war for other reasons so we made it happen with Nukes as the scapegoat. Sounds familiar.
Then why isn’t Iran making that claim? Why aren’t they espousing the lack of nuclear enrichment?
How stupid the American populace is may be the bigger issue
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:01 pm to sgallo3
But they've been 6 months away from a nuclear weapon for the past 30 years.....sooner or later Secretary of State Neatnyahu will be right.....just you watch.
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:01 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
What is the purpose of 60% enriched uranium?
Personally I dont care.
Hopefully they develop nuclear power soon, like the rest of the future world as it will become a more prevalent source of power in the future.
N Korea has had nukes for 20 years.
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Personally I dont care.
Roger. I’m glad you’re ok and that you’re back. But this is just willful ignorance. Doesn’t seem like you.
quote:
Hopefully they develop nuclear power soon, like the rest of the future world as it will become a more prevalent source of power in the future.
Requires maximum 5% enrichment. They were at 60.
quote:
N Korea has had nukes for 20 years.
We want more North Koreas? Your TDS is off the charts, bud.
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:05 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
There is no civilian purpose to do that
Do you even HALEU?
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:05 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
But they've been 6 months away from a nuclear weapon for the past 30 years.....sooner or later Secretary of State Neatnyahu will be right.....just you watch.
Moron. Keep reading. It takes two weeks max to go from 60%!to 90%. It amazes me how many of you idiots post with such hubris from a place of complete ignorance.
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:05 pm to BBONDS25
It’s a typo man. Who cares. Any response to the perfect mission? Our government has lied to us my entire life. Anyone with half a brain can tell Israel led us into this cluster frick by our balls.
If you say anything against this stupid shite all you get is you must love Islam or some other retarded response. No I despise Islam but I’m ready for our government to start addressing the many issues we have here including all the fraud that we pay in taxes. You can have all the missiles and tanks you want but quit spending half of it on complete waste. frick it all. Im going to drink a beer and have dinner with my loved ones.
If you say anything against this stupid shite all you get is you must love Islam or some other retarded response. No I despise Islam but I’m ready for our government to start addressing the many issues we have here including all the fraud that we pay in taxes. You can have all the missiles and tanks you want but quit spending half of it on complete waste. frick it all. Im going to drink a beer and have dinner with my loved ones.
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:07 pm to KiwiHead
Maybe try not being so obsessed with every word that Netanyahu says, and pay more attention to the many other sources of information and concern on this subject than just him. The concern and strategizing on this matter hasn’t and doesn’t start and end with Netanyahu.
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:08 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
But this is just willful ignorance.
Nukes are a deterrent, tis been the conservative view for 80 years.
Stop fearing ghosts that dont exist.
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Should the Taliban have nukes for deterrent effect? Fair and square?
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Nukes are a deterrent, tis been the conservative view for 80 years. Stop fearing ghosts that dont exist.
good lord. You hate Trump so much you advocate for a nuclear armed Iran. This post was edited on 5/8/26 at 5:10 pm
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:11 pm to CDUBTX
quote:
Any response to the perfect mission?
Yes. It’s about China. The fact Iran was two weeks away from a nuclear weapon is just lagniappe. How anyone could not see that baffles me.
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:12 pm to davyjones
quote:
Should the Taliban have nuke
No, but afghanistan should.
If Iran had nukes right now, we would have overthrown their govt years ago, and they would be at peace.
Thats how the "Long Peace" prevailed.
quote:
Evidence for Nuclear Deterrence
Great-power restraint: The U.S. and USSR never fought directly despite intense rivalry Wikipedia.
War frequency decline: International wars dropped from six per year in the 1950s to one per year in the 2000s Wikipedia.
Warfare taboo: Nuclear use has been avoided, even in crises, because of the risk of escalation
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:15 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The fact Iran was two weeks away from a nuclear weapon is just lagniappe
We were told, less than 12 months ago, that we set them back years.
Now we are told two weeks, a timeframe used for 30 years.
Which statement is the lie and who told the lie?
Posted on 5/8/26 at 5:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
This is so fricking stupid, you don't take into consideration the religious components here, and secondly, the taliban IS Afghanistan, and if they had a nuke Isis would have it tomorrow.
Page 6 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News