re: US Sided with Russia , North Korea over UN against Ukraine

Our country should never side with the UN. Kick them out.

drunk posting at 1:04 am?

when do you deploy jethrine?

quote:

---

Hillary Clinton was correct many years ago Putin isTrumps lover

---

Imagine thinking its bad for the US and Russia to be friendly towards each other. When we have to fight WWIII with China - I'd rather have Russia on our side.

Remember that hot mic stating he would do whatever Vlad wanted in his 2nd term

Isnt that when Crimea got taken?

Tankies like you must love this capitulation to Putin.

quote:

---

Mr Jail Cell Phone

---

You must be on the take.

quote:

---

This is all time low for the United States of America a disgrace a tragic mistake siding with Russia over Europe and the UN .

---

Why? What value does the average European country bring to an alliance with America?

Leadership in Russia has changed! They weren’t seeking to add territory back then!

/s

The reference is to John Fonte. He wrote an article in 2001 titled “Liberal Democracy vs. Transnational Progressivism- The Future of the Ideological Civil War Within the West.” Fonte wrote this article and coined the term to describe the transnational progressive movement that he observed at a UN meeting where over 50 American run NGOs used the UN platform to castigate American and Western civilization in general as flawed and in need of a makeover. The article itself is hard to locate these days but with some skill in searching one could probably find it in its entirety. However, searching John Fonte and/or Transnational Progressivism will result in several hits of people citing his article. Below is one summary I found regarding the article.

Fonte sums up this worldview or “ideology” in nine traits. His discussion of each is prefaced by an italicized thesis-phrase or statement. Here is the list: 1) The ascribed group over the individual. 2) A dichotomy of groups: Oppressor versus victim groups, with immigrant groups designated as victims. 3) Group proportionalism as the goal of “fairness.” 4) The values of all dominant institutions to be changed to reflect the perspective of the victim groups. 5) The Demographic Imperative. (By this he means the view that, because of domestic demographic changes and global population flows, “the traditional paradigm of American nationhood [is] obsolete” and “must be changed into a system that promotes ‘diversity,’ defined, in the end, as group proportionalism”). 6) The redefinition of democracy and “democratic ideals.” 7) Deconstruction of national narratives and national symbols. 8) Promotion of the concept of postnational citizenship. 9) The idea of transnationalism as a major conceptual tool.