Started By
Message

re: UPDATED: Federal court rules Trump admin can withhold grants to NYC, 7 states over c

Posted on 2/26/20 at 10:21 am to
Posted by Rocco Lampone
Raleigh, NC
Member since Nov 2010
3051 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 10:21 am to
At some point, I feel like I’m going to get tired of winning, but it hasn’t happened yet!
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51488 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Hawaii Judge incoming


I hope so. I want to see SCOTUS follow through on their threat of shutting that shite down.
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
11795 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 10:24 am to
New Link

quote:

The Trump administration can withhold millions of dollars in law enforcement grants to force states to cooperate with U.S. immigration enforcement, a federal appeals court in New York ruled Wednesday in a decision that conflicted with three other federal appeals courts.

The decision by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan overturned a lower court's decision ordering the administration to release funding to New York City and seven states — New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Washington, Massachusetts, Virginia and Rhode Island.

The states and city sued the U.S. government after the Justice Department announced in 2017 that it would withhold grant money from cities and states until they gave federal immigration authorities access to jails and provide advance notice when someone in the country illegally is about to be released.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57426 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 10:27 am to
I mean the FEDs withheld money and to raise the drinking age to 21, How is this any different.
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
50092 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 10:29 am to
I can't take all of this winning for America!!!
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48295 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 10:30 am to
For generations, Democrats have bloated the power and finances of the federal government at the expense of the states. Now it’s coming back to bite them in the arse.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98494 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 10:44 am to
quote:

2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals


That's BIG!
Posted by papasmurf1269
Hells Pass
Member since Apr 2005
20885 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 10:44 am to
I really don’t understand what the big deal about withholding money from the state is. I seem to remember when I was younger that the state of Louisiana had a drinking age of 18 and the federal government came in and said unless you move your drinking age to 21 we will withhold millions of dollars of federal funds and nothing was said. The state ended up moving the drinking age to 21.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 10:46 am to
quote:

a decision that conflicted with three other federal appeals courts.


Muh injunctions
Posted by Rock the Casbah
Member since Dec 2014
940 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 11:22 am to
quote:

I mean the FEDs withheld money and to raise the drinking age to 21, How is this any different.


Just about every Federal grant has a very long list of weasel wording that allows the executive branch to pull funding.

The lower court judge must be a total hack.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78922 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 11:26 am to
I'm not sure what winning looks like....

but this looks like winning
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90506 posts
Posted on 2/26/20 at 11:46 am to
Selling my stock in the salt mines because there is about to be an oversupply
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram