Started By
Message

re: Daily COVID Updated as of 11/2/20 8:00 PM

Posted on 7/12/20 at 6:50 pm to
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
5539 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

The flu has antivirals and a vaccine and a much lower death rate. It also doesn't appear to leave lingering damage as much. What about the flu are you infuriated about?


So...if there are antivirals and vaccines, why is the infection rate so high? Also, appears that some statisticians predict the overall death rate to be comparable even without vaccine. I guess you don't give a shite about the truth ...oh well.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Also, appears that some statisticians predict the overall death rate to be comparable even without vaccine.
What? Fewer than 40,000 people on average die of the flu in a given year. There has already been 3.5 the amount of deaths with only 40-70 percent of the total flu infections and both and rising, with a 3-4 week lag from infection death.

So on the low, it’s 4-5 times deadlier than the flu and in the high end, it’s 9-10 times as deadly PER INFECTION.
This post was edited on 7/12/20 at 7:07 pm
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6826 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 7:45 pm to
At this point, I don’t think there is anyone who can seriously say this is just a bad flu. There is really no comparison anymore.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9897 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 8:22 pm to
It's not only more deadly than the flu, it's clear that it's a vascular disease rather than a purely respiratory disease, so it ends up affecting many organ systems affected that flu doesn't touch.
This post was edited on 7/12/20 at 8:32 pm
Posted by Niccolo Machiavelli
Member since Jun 2020
1622 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

I don’t think there is anyone who can seriously say this is just a bad flu


My brother-in-law has it and he said the flu is actually worse.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9897 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 9:25 pm to
It's a weird disease because about 30% of cases are asymptomatic, so for a lot of people the flu is worse, but at a population level it looks like COVID is 5-8x more lethal.
This post was edited on 7/12/20 at 10:19 pm
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34869 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

There has already been 3.5 the amount of deaths with only 40-70 percent of the total flu infections and both and rising, with a 3-4 week lag from infection death.


We honestly have no idea how many have been infected, let’s be honest. CDC also is estimating death rate around .26% last I saw, so a little over double the flu. Has that changed?
This post was edited on 7/12/20 at 9:43 pm
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

CDC also is estimating death rate around .26% last I saw, so a little over double the flu. Has that changed?
That was they only thing I’ve seen, and it was nonsense with no rationale or explanation for their parameters and the only sources in the document were from an Iranian study of almost exclusively Chinese data from January and February.

The best meta analysis I’ve seen has out it between 0.6 and 0.8 percent, so I think it’s clear that the IFR is likely 2-3 times the CDC estimate.
Posted by Crimsonians
Member since Nov 2019
1584 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 8:38 am to
Why you can't trust data. Reported on here 476 deaths yesterday. WOM ended with a grand total of 380. Big difference. Never know what is going on with the reporting. Which states are dumping previous thought to be COVID deaths, etc. Nobody knows.
Posted by Eat Your Crow
caught beneath the landslide
Member since May 2017
9190 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Reported on here 476 deaths yesterday. WOM ended with a grand total of 380. Big difference

Doesn't Chrome get his numbers from WOM?
Posted by Crimsonians
Member since Nov 2019
1584 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 8:47 am to
Nope. And WOM usually has higher numbers because what he uses spits it out before WOM.
This post was edited on 7/13/20 at 8:49 am
Posted by Eat Your Crow
caught beneath the landslide
Member since May 2017
9190 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 8:48 am to
Ah, okay. I always assumed he did for some reason.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 9:33 am to
He uses Covidtracking.com
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33350 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 9:54 am to
quote:


So...if there are antivirals and vaccines, why is the infection rate so high?
Because it's a highly infections virus? And also because lots of deniers and anti-vaxxers still don't get their flu shots to this day.

quote:

Also, appears that some statisticians predict the overall death rate to be comparable even without vaccine
Given the lack of antivirals and vaccines, the coronavirus is set to be a lot more deadly than the flu.
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6826 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 9:55 am to
Crow, I used to use WoM; however, when I rebuilt the tracker I switched to using the COVID Tracking Project(CTP) numbers. CTP offers an automated data feed whereas with WOM I had to key all the numbers manually. There isn't anyway I could track every state and the US without it being automated.

There is some variation in the numbers on a daily basis as CTP cuts off their reporting at 4pm CST while WoM cuts off at 8pm. There are numbers that will show up on WOM that don't show up until the following day for CTP. It all works out over time.
This post was edited on 7/13/20 at 9:57 am
Posted by Crimsonians
Member since Nov 2019
1584 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 10:07 am to
Just wondering how WOM had way less staying open longer. Dump on tracker? Bad number?
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34869 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Just wondering how WOM had way less staying open longer. Dump on tracker? Bad number?



How did the previous days look? If tracker shuts it off sooner, wouldn't any late afternoon results get reported the next day? So, that would make WOM for the following day appear less than tracker.

I would think that would be the reason, but maybe I am mistaken.
Posted by Crimsonians
Member since Nov 2019
1584 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 10:39 am to
That would make sense.

Well except tracker had 26 more on Saturday as well.
This post was edited on 7/13/20 at 10:43 am
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6826 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 11:19 am to
I gave up trying to make sense of the daily ebbs and flows in the numbers and am just focusing on the overall trending. At the end of the day if one is different from the other by +/- 26 deaths it doesn't really matter.
This post was edited on 7/13/20 at 11:19 am
Posted by Crimsonians
Member since Nov 2019
1584 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 11:43 am to
Likely going to be really low today.

Spoke too soon. NY must have saved some.
This post was edited on 7/13/20 at 12:09 pm
first pageprev pagePage 258 of 331Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram