- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/21/26 at 8:04 pm to BozemanTiger
Sure can. And your post makes no sense, as you admit to babbling about nothing.
Posted on 6/21/26 at 8:26 pm to PineyWoodsHog
If this is not a hate crime, then hate crime charges should not exist for anyone.
If hate crimes are charged in just one direction, then the obvious motive is to prevent people from defending themselves from certain groups.
If hate crimes are charged in just one direction, then the obvious motive is to prevent people from defending themselves from certain groups.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 8:52 am to PineyWoodsHog
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
click here:
https://x.cancel.com/sippicup2/status/2068776468834914703#m
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 8:55 am
Posted on 6/22/26 at 10:19 am to PineyWoodsHog
Posted on 6/22/26 at 10:35 am to JPinLondon
quote:
Clearly her injuries are just as fake.
Appears to be too much blood for just a gash over the eye.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 11:44 am to prouddawg
quote:
Good gosh people carry a gun and freaking use it!
If she follows the law, she would not have been able to do so. It appears she was out drinking at a bar with friends. There are laws about carrying a gun into establishments that primarily serve alcohol. I assume majority of the population are law abiding citizens. Which would mean if she were one to conceal carry, she would have kept her firearm locked up in her home or car for this night out.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 11:50 am to PineyWoodsHog
It’s going to keep happening until somebody does something about it
Posted on 6/22/26 at 11:52 am to BuckI
You may want to expand a bit.
How did she ask to be beaten?
How did she ask to be beaten?
Posted on 6/22/26 at 11:57 am to Weekend Warrior79
Absolutely.
For example, if an FBI agent is traveling and meets friends for drinks later, he must lock his firearm in his hotel room safe.
The public should do the same. Carrying and drinking is a recipe for disaster.
For example, if an FBI agent is traveling and meets friends for drinks later, he must lock his firearm in his hotel room safe.
The public should do the same. Carrying and drinking is a recipe for disaster.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 12:06 pm to roadGator
quote:
Carrying and drinking is a recipe for disaster.
That's why I do my drinking at home. Not carrying is a recipe for a bigger disaster.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 12:48 pm to LSU7096
quote:
They will cry racism and KKK when people retaliate.
We don’t care anymore
So be it
Posted on 6/22/26 at 1:35 pm to beachdude
Do you really think that when an injured person gets staples,it's because they were wounded by a stapler wielding attacker? The staples were obviously part of the treatment for a cut to her scalp.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 2:00 pm to Goombaw
quote:
I’ll go on record and say something about this seems fake to me
That she was beaten up does NOT appear to be fake.
That she was sitting in a bar 150 miles away from where the Anthony events/trial took place, minding her own business with no conflict whatsoever, only to be randomly attacked by a group of black women she didn't know and had no prior interaction with, who were shouting out cliche terms of "free Karmelo", and oddly telling her the specific basis of why she was being randomly attacked seems a bit suspect.
Is it possible the events occurred exactly as reported? Sure. Anything is possible. But if the roles were reversed, 95% of the board would be calling this "fake". I suspect there is more to this story than is being reported. Most likely some sort of prior conflict/interaction between the parties before whatever happened outside took place.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 2:32 pm to stephenc
quote:
Do you actually think that…
Of course not. I’m fully aware of medical procedures to staunch the flow of blood and staples to seal lacerations to the scalp. I was merely pointing out what I perceived to be Ms. James incorrect description of what an “injury” is. Any local Texas news media stories on this yet?
Posted on 6/22/26 at 2:50 pm to krewerider
quote:
Appears to be too much blood for just a gash over the eye
There were additional pics in the X post. She also had a gash on the back of her head that required staples. Anyone that's ever had a head cut knows they bleed bright red blood like crazy.
At this point, I don't know how much truth there is to the story or not. I've not seen any new updates, other than the girl naming her attackers, or anything from local police. That doesn't mean it didn't happen the way it was reported. It could be currently under investigation and the police holding info until that is complete. For people to just outright say the story is BS or that the injuries/ blood is fake is just retarded.
However it plays out, the original intent of the post still stands. There are nut jobs out there that support a convicted killer and think it's okay to attack those that disagree with them. That's a fact!
Posted on 6/22/26 at 3:21 pm to PineyWoodsHog
quote:
However it plays out, the original intent of the post still stands. There are nut jobs out there that support a convicted killer and think it's okay to attack those that disagree with them. That's a fact!
If it plays out that this woman was not randomly attacked by people on the basis of retribution for the Anthony verdict, then wouldn't that totally negate the position of the original post that this proves there are people who think it is ok to attack those that disagree with their position on the verdict? In other words, a warning to be aware of a risk that factually didn't actually exist because the event didn't happen as alleged?
Wouldn't the more reasonable approach be to gather all of the information and then reach a conclusion, rather than just reflexively believe one side of the story which, at first blush, appears to have some mildly curious aspects?
Posted on 6/22/26 at 3:49 pm to Alt26
quote:
If it plays out that this woman was not randomly attacked by people on the basis of retribution for the Anthony verdict, then wouldn't that totally negate the position of the original post that this proves there are people who think it is ok to attack
Let me clarify. The OP was intended to make people aware that this type of violence occurs and that this 'could' be an example of it in the area where I live. Regardless of whether this story ends up having gone down as described, my intent still stands which was (just as I stated in my OP) to ask people to be careful and be prepared out there. Nowhere, in my post, did I say "this proves" anything. There's no need for that because there is proof everywhere that this type of vendetta violence takes place.
Popular
Back to top


1









