Started By
Message

re: UN: US Guilty Of War Crimes In Iran

Posted on 9/17/26 at 5:26 pm to
Posted by beebefootballfan
Member since Mar 2011
21103 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

You know what you should do? You should sanction me. Sanction me with your army. Oh! wait a minute! You don't have an army! So I guess that means you need to shut the frick up! That's what I would do if I don't have an army, I would shut the frick up. -Dave Chappelle
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
10545 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 5:27 pm to
Absolutely 0.00000% credibility.

There are thousands of examples of why the UN can be safely ignored, but if we only include the event their lies and misrepresentation of events during the Palestine Israel war their credibility is again zero
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
26211 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 5:28 pm to
How bout frick the UN!!!!!1
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
40630 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Absolutely is.


Not even a little bit
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
11442 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

I would shut the frick up. -Dave Chappelle


So, you agree that the Pentagon won't release a report on the Minab School bombing, because no one can make them?
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
40630 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 5:38 pm to
Dbyrd says that shooting a tomahawk missile at little girls is hard work but someone’s gotta do it!
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
109308 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 5:42 pm to
He’s not totally wrong. I think you actually can look at it as a threat from the poster. He made no reference to who could justify killing the other poster’s wife and children over comments made. The OP could be referring to himself being the one justified. So yeah, even a little bit.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
40630 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

He made no reference to who could justify killing the other poster’s wife and children over comments made. The OP could be referring to himself being the one justified


If you have absolutely zero reading comprehension and a wannabe victimhood complex, then sure

Otherwise? Nah
Posted by 1801
Charleston
Member since Aug 2012
9142 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 6:13 pm to
President Trump should seize this East River property through Civil Forfeiture due to all the crimes that have originated from that locale and its inhabitants -



re-purpose it into a national Firefighters - Law Enforcement - First Response - convention hall and entertainment complex / museum -

prosecute a large majority of those who currently squat in it -
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
60830 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

False, you are only looking at one part of the proces


Once again you are opining from a place of complete ignorance. It takes a MAX of two weeks to go from 65% to weaponized.
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 6:51 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
60830 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

When Israel has been claiming Iran was 2 weeks away from nukes since the 90s… and Trump is the first one to fall for it… Lol


The war is about China, dummy. And they were two weeks away. Just ask them.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
40198 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 6:46 pm to
quote:



Once again your are opining from a place of complete ignorance. It takes a MAX of two weeks to go from 65% to weaponized.


And they still wouldn't have a nuke because that is only one part of the process.


Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
60830 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

And they still wouldn't have a nuke because that is only one part of the process.


Describe to us the process and timeframe then and let’s see if you’re arguing something meaningful or just being the usual moron you are.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
70651 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 6:51 pm to
When we allegedly bombed the wedding recently, one of the articles I saw said we are going to investigate that and that a report is pending on the school.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24844 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

What kind of a fricking moron does it take to disregard that?


One who has to see a mushroom cloud or feel an underground test to believe.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24844 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 6:57 pm to
Russia has been ac used of war crimes by the UN. And Russia still has a vote on the Security Council. While not company to be with, Russia has never lost a step. And the UN has TDS.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
11442 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

that a report is pending on the school.


Thanks. PENDING is the key word. I doubt it's "finished" during this administration.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
25176 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 7:05 pm to
Ok..... so, what are they gonna do about it?
Isn't that the real question?
If an institution has a capacity to make such claims but has zero ability to enforce any type of consequence or enforcement, what's the point of that institution???

As with all globalist creations, the UN and all the globalist institutions are hollow. Same as the ideology that created them. Hollow with no substance nor "backbone".

America, since its inception has always had "backbone". The UN shouldn't be allowed to operate within US borders. Your and my tax dollars shouldn't be spent to support such a shallow and meaningless institution.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
25176 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

When we allegedly bombed the wedding recently, one of the articles I saw said we are going to investigate that and that a report is pending on the school.



Geez. Eat a dick man. Your lack of American loyalty and silly opinions are tiresome. You would find more acceptance at the Democrat Underground. IMHO
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
40198 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 7:08 pm to
quote:


Describe to us the process and timeframe then and let’s see if you’re arguing something meaningful or just being the usual moron you are.


If they reach weaponization of the uranium they still need a bunch of engineering feats to accomplish before it's an actual weapon.

None of which Iran is believed to have because it would be near impossible to keep it a secret.

The gas has to be converted into solid uranium metal - you can't do that before you have the gas and you need facilities to do it. That metal has to be machined. The scientists have to design all the firing circuits, trigger mechanism and lenses.

And then you need a delivery system. They have missiles, but nothing stable enough to launch nukes(miniaturization) from and that also requires special testing they have not done.

It's like having gunpowder vs having a functional bullet and gun.





This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 7:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram