re: Ukraine must investigate Joe Biden's son, says ex-Ukrainian PM

quote:

---

Also, we need to get to the bottom of the Crowdstrike/Ukraine issue.

---

The link below is to an article from Fortune's newsletter where they comment on the Crowdstrike/Ukraine matter as a result of Trump mentioning it in his phone conversation with Zelensky.

I think this paragraph from the Fortune article sums it up succinctly:

quote:

---

CrowdStrike, whose name readers of this newsletter may already recognize, is the digital forensics firm that investigated breaches at the Democratic National Committee in the lead-up to the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Why did its name surface on the call? It's not entirely clear. But the mention begins to make some sense if one entertains fringe beliefs, fantasies, and paranoid speculation.

---

What many posters on this board seem to fail to appreciate is that a significant portion of Trump's reality is directly based on the programs he consumes daily on Fox news. THINK ABOUT THAT.

So, the fact that many of you profess to not watch Fox news, makes me question how you can turn around and believe everything that Trump says when a goodly portion of it comes directly from ... wait for it ... FOX NEWS.

LINK

Hmmm, let me think. Who’s more trustworthy? The CIA and FBI, the MSM, the Democrats (LOL) or Trump?

I’m gonna go with Trump on this one.

quote:

---

While it is unclear specifically what Trump was referring to with Crowdstrike, the company founded by a Russian-born businessman was tapped by the Democratic National Committee, which funded the Steele dossier, to examine its servers after they were hacked during the 2016 campaign. The company alleged that Russian actors had hacked the server.

Crowdstrike was forced to revise and retract “statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year’s American presidential election campaign” after it was accused of misrepresenting data. Some cybersecurity experts strongly questioned its unequivocal claims regarding Russian hacking. Its report on Ukrainian artillery losses was widely circulated in the media before it was revised and retracted.

---

Yeah, when the ENTIRE Russian hoax investigation that consumed his presidency for 2.5 years ALL HINGED on a report from Crowdstrike, a DNC contractor which has been forced to revise and retract MULTIPLE FALSE reports in the past, and then refused to provide an UNREDACTED report on the server to the fbi, it’s not fantasy or paranoia to question ANYTHING about their findings. Most honest people would consider that reasonable skepticism. Perhaps if the Democrats and the DNC were that “confident” that it was Russia, they shouldve turned the server over to the FBI. If the FBI was actually interested in conducting an honest investigation, they would’ve a)demanded the server and b) demanded the UNREDACTED report.

But now that we know there was no collusion and taxpayers paid $40 mil for a fraudulent investigation that took 2.5 years of Trumps presidency, Barr and of course, Trump, want to know the truth about HOW the whole sham got started— which, for some reason, has Democrats freaking out!!

If everything is on the up and up, why the concern?

LINK

quote:

---

quote:
Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau said on Friday it was investigating activity at Burisma between 2010-2012, but that it was not looking into changes to its board in 2014, when Hunter Biden joined.

I'm sure it was an honest oversight on your part.

---

I also did not post this

quote:

---

Azarov said he was not aware of any evidence suggesting wrongdoing on Hunter Biden's part, but said it was in the Ukrainian public interest to ascertain the legality of his activities.

In particular, he said it was important to investigate what Biden had done for Burisma to justify his remuneration from Burisma.

The younger Biden has said he consulted for Burisma, but critics have suggested he was not doing actual work in return for his compensation, an allegation he denies.

"I think it's essential (he's investigated)," Azarov told Reuters in Moscow, where he fled after street protests toppled Russia-friendly President Viktor Yanukovich in 2014.

"If, using his knowledge, he played an active role then there's nothing scandalous about it," Azarov said. "But if he was simply on the books and getting money, then that could be seen as a violation of the law."

---

It is suspicious that the investigation into Burisma was dropped once VP Biden got the prosecutor fired. If there was no wrong doing by baby Biden, then he has nothing to worry about, so an investigation will simply be a nothing burger for him. It appears that HB was simply on the books receiving a paycheck without being capable of adding any value to the Burisma Board except for the fact that his daddy was VP and could with hold $1 Billion from Ukraine unless daddy gets his way. This would be illegal in Ukraine. The prosecutor got fired and the Burisma case was dropped. The crime is getting paid because daddy is the US VP.
Don't you find that highly suspicious and worthy of an investigation? If not, then join the hypocrite democrat crowd.

quote:

---

The guy was recently released from prison and was not even a lawyer, yet he was hand-picked him to replace Shokin as General Prosecutor . . .

---

The democrats approve of these type of prosecutors. That's why HRC is not in jail.

She'll take another Qualude and love me in the morning.

I don't recall saying Shokin was a great prosecutor. Maybe you can link that up. And look down at our brother NCs note on honest yuriy

quote:

---

The guy was recently released from prison and was not even a lawyer, yet he was hand-picked him to replace Shokin as General Prosecutor . . .

---

Laughable

Spill it.

quote:

---

His term on the board ended in 2018.

What does that tell you?

---

Wrong again
LINK
Daddy Joe announced his candidacy days after Hunter left Burisma.

You can't buy timing like that, unless you write whistleblower protocols.