Started By
Message

re: UK Unrest: Migrants are now being boated to the UK from Normandy.

Posted on 10/6/26 at 4:13 am to
Posted by tgerb8
Huntsvegas
Member since Aug 2007
6684 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 4:13 am to
quote:

When the citizens don't vote the way you want them to, you replace the citizens with those who will.

It's as simple as that.


I mean.. ok.. but that seems shortsighted by everyone involved.

If the govt is willing to break the law by committing "immigration fraud" then why wouldn't they just imprison the current population instead of displacing it in favor of those who will do absolutely nothing for them at any step...

What does it matter what your population votes for if your GDP is 12 and you're 90 percent Muslim? it's better to be the king of Mogadishu than the prime minister of the UK?
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
22071 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:17 am to
I really hate these videos.


I promise you this isn’t a joke. Uhh uhh I promise it’s real.

The people of this country are the biggest cowards I have ever seen. Stop looking at YouTube and get to fricking work.

Pussies.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
11829 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:40 am to


There’s some serious trolling going on in this thread …




Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486493 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:48 am to
quote:

If French ships escorted them out and met with British ships who escorted them in, then it is literally the definition of coordinated effort. For some one who claims to be so intelligent you should probably revisit a dictionary and learn the definitions of elementary words.

Those ships are just there to ensure the migrants don't die in a boating accident. You're using an expanded concept of "escorted" to force this coordination.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486493 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:51 am to
quote:

Libertarians would rather have this here


These migrants wouldn't be coming in a libertarian utopia. The lack of welfare makes it a -EV proposition for them.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
25409 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:54 am to
They’re rushing this because they fear what the US did in South America will happen in Europe soon (flipping it from socialist to nationalist) and need to hit the population replacement tipping point before he gets a chance.

Agenda 2030 is happening in front of our eyes in real time.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
76593 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:55 am to
Poor UK government. Just a helpless bystander to a system SFP admits is being exploited. Taxpayers can pick up the tab while he explains why everyone discussing it is too stupid to understand the finer points.

He’s certainly cleared up his position on his own intelligence. Still waiting on his position on the policy.

Apparently that part is optional when you’re this busy being above the fray.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486493 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:56 am to
quote:

He’s certainly cleared up his position on his own intelligence. Still waiting on his position on the policy.


My disclaimer is already paying dividends
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486493 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:58 am to
quote:

Apparently that part is optional when you’re this busy being above the fray

Getting the underlying facts right with people of your ilk is necessary to have that conversation. Considering how hard it is to achieve that, I don't hold out hope on a policy-level discussion.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
76593 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:59 am to
Less than a minute. You’d think I’d announced the breakfast buffet was closing.

Your disclaimer says explaining government actions doesn’t mean endorsing them. Understood. It still doesn’t tell us whether you support the policy.

Plenty of time to call everyone stupid. Apparently stating your own position requires another disclaimer.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486493 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:00 am to
quote:

Less than a minute. You’d think I’d announced the breakfast buffet was closing.


I had already corrected others and had the page open. You're not special.

quote:

Your disclaimer says explaining government actions doesn’t mean endorsing them. Understood. It still doesn’t tell us whether you support the policy.

You need to catch up to the next post.

Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
76593 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:01 am to
“People of your ilk.” There’s that towering intellect of yours again.

Which specific factual claim in my post is wrong? Quote it and correct it.

I understand your distinction between explaining government actions and endorsing them. What I asked was your position on the policy. (Another opportunity for you to gaslight us)

Apparently I need to pass an entrance exam before you can tell us what you think. Very above the fray. How’s that double McGriddle treating you this morning?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
76593 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:03 am to
Caught up. Another paragraph about how stupid everyone except you is.

That’s your position on the posters, genius. Still waiting on your position on the policy.
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
20418 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:04 am to
The odd thing about that book is he thought the wave would come from India.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486493 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:09 am to
quote:

People of your ilk.” There’s that towering intellect of yours again.

Which specific factual claim in my post is wrong? Quote it and correct it.


quote:

Caught up. Another paragraph about how stupid everyone except you is.


There you go. You also engaged in ad homs.

quote:

Still waiting on your position on the policy.

We have to get the facts right. The vast majority have to reject and summarily dismiss silly arguments like "globalism" or "agenda 230" etc. Otherwise it's just setting up the classic NPC motte and bailey fallacy they learned from their echo chamber content creators
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
76593 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:17 am to
You’re confident enough to declare the laws are being exploited and lecture everyone about their intelligence. What specific fact are you still missing before you can say what should change?

Which rules would you change, and how?

Why does stating YOUR position require the “vast majority” to meet your standards first?

Surely explaining your own opinion is within your vast capabilities.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486493 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:23 am to
quote:

You’re confident enough to declare the laws are being exploited and lecture everyone about their intelligence

I didn't really mention intelligence

Smart people can be swept up in cult-like/NPC thinking, too.

There have been several posters of above average to hide intelligence on here. If you've got swept up into the Q nonsense who then woke up later and realized how stupid they were falling into that trap. I was very happy to see certain posters do this exact thing.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
76593 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:28 am to
quote:

I didn’t really mention intelligence


“Smooth brains” was your wording earlier. You followed this denial with another paragraph evaluating everyone’s intelligence. Excellent clarification.

Now that you’ve finished grading the board, which refugee rules would you change?

QAnon wasn’t the question.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486493 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:31 am to
quote:

Now that you’ve finished grading the board, which refugee rules would you change?

As has been stated in this thread, the intelligent policy isn't about the "refugee rules". Remove the domestic public incentives and this behavior will decrease on its own, naturally.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
67620 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:49 am to
Their government has been seized by enemies. There is no political solution. They have to seize their country back.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram