
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UK Unrest: Migrants are now being boated to the UK from Normandy.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 4:13 am to Centinel
Posted on 10/6/26 at 4:13 am to Centinel
quote:
When the citizens don't vote the way you want them to, you replace the citizens with those who will.
It's as simple as that.
I mean.. ok.. but that seems shortsighted by everyone involved.
If the govt is willing to break the law by committing "immigration fraud" then why wouldn't they just imprison the current population instead of displacing it in favor of those who will do absolutely nothing for them at any step...
What does it matter what your population votes for if your GDP is 12 and you're 90 percent Muslim? it's better to be the king of Mogadishu than the prime minister of the UK?
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:17 am to BoomerandSooner
I really hate these videos.
I promise you this isn’t a joke. Uhh uhh I promise it’s real.
The people of this country are the biggest cowards I have ever seen. Stop looking at YouTube and get to fricking work.
Pussies.
I promise you this isn’t a joke. Uhh uhh I promise it’s real.
The people of this country are the biggest cowards I have ever seen. Stop looking at YouTube and get to fricking work.
Pussies.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:40 am to BoomerandSooner
There’s some serious trolling going on in this thread …
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:48 am to MikkUGA
quote:
If French ships escorted them out and met with British ships who escorted them in, then it is literally the definition of coordinated effort. For some one who claims to be so intelligent you should probably revisit a dictionary and learn the definitions of elementary words.
Those ships are just there to ensure the migrants don't die in a boating accident. You're using an expanded concept of "escorted" to force this coordination.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:51 am to djsdawg
quote:
Libertarians would rather have this here
These migrants wouldn't be coming in a libertarian utopia. The lack of welfare makes it a -EV proposition for them.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:54 am to BoomerandSooner
They’re rushing this because they fear what the US did in South America will happen in Europe soon (flipping it from socialist to nationalist) and need to hit the population replacement tipping point before he gets a chance.
Agenda 2030 is happening in front of our eyes in real time.
Agenda 2030 is happening in front of our eyes in real time.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:55 am to BoomerandSooner
Poor UK government. Just a helpless bystander to a system SFP admits is being exploited. Taxpayers can pick up the tab while he explains why everyone discussing it is too stupid to understand the finer points.
He’s certainly cleared up his position on his own intelligence. Still waiting on his position on the policy.
Apparently that part is optional when you’re this busy being above the fray.
He’s certainly cleared up his position on his own intelligence. Still waiting on his position on the policy.
Apparently that part is optional when you’re this busy being above the fray.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:56 am to Klark Kent
quote:
He’s certainly cleared up his position on his own intelligence. Still waiting on his position on the policy.
My disclaimer is already paying dividends
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:58 am to Klark Kent
quote:
Apparently that part is optional when you’re this busy being above the fray
Getting the underlying facts right with people of your ilk is necessary to have that conversation. Considering how hard it is to achieve that, I don't hold out hope on a policy-level discussion.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:59 am to SlowFlowPro
Less than a minute. You’d think I’d announced the breakfast buffet was closing.
Your disclaimer says explaining government actions doesn’t mean endorsing them. Understood. It still doesn’t tell us whether you support the policy.
Plenty of time to call everyone stupid. Apparently stating your own position requires another disclaimer.
Your disclaimer says explaining government actions doesn’t mean endorsing them. Understood. It still doesn’t tell us whether you support the policy.
Plenty of time to call everyone stupid. Apparently stating your own position requires another disclaimer.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:00 am to Klark Kent
quote:
Less than a minute. You’d think I’d announced the breakfast buffet was closing.
I had already corrected others and had the page open. You're not special.
quote:
Your disclaimer says explaining government actions doesn’t mean endorsing them. Understood. It still doesn’t tell us whether you support the policy.
You need to catch up to the next post.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:01 am to SlowFlowPro
“People of your ilk.” There’s that towering intellect of yours again.
Which specific factual claim in my post is wrong? Quote it and correct it.
I understand your distinction between explaining government actions and endorsing them. What I asked was your position on the policy. (Another opportunity for you to gaslight us)
Apparently I need to pass an entrance exam before you can tell us what you think. Very above the fray. How’s that double McGriddle treating you this morning?
Which specific factual claim in my post is wrong? Quote it and correct it.
I understand your distinction between explaining government actions and endorsing them. What I asked was your position on the policy. (Another opportunity for you to gaslight us)
Apparently I need to pass an entrance exam before you can tell us what you think. Very above the fray. How’s that double McGriddle treating you this morning?
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:03 am to SlowFlowPro
Caught up. Another paragraph about how stupid everyone except you is.
That’s your position on the posters, genius. Still waiting on your position on the policy.
That’s your position on the posters, genius. Still waiting on your position on the policy.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:04 am to cadillacattack
The odd thing about that book is he thought the wave would come from India.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:09 am to Klark Kent
quote:
People of your ilk.” There’s that towering intellect of yours again.
Which specific factual claim in my post is wrong? Quote it and correct it.
quote:
Caught up. Another paragraph about how stupid everyone except you is.
There you go. You also engaged in ad homs.
quote:
Still waiting on your position on the policy.
We have to get the facts right. The vast majority have to reject and summarily dismiss silly arguments like "globalism" or "agenda 230" etc. Otherwise it's just setting up the classic NPC motte and bailey fallacy they learned from their echo chamber content creators
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:17 am to SlowFlowPro
You’re confident enough to declare the laws are being exploited and lecture everyone about their intelligence. What specific fact are you still missing before you can say what should change?
Which rules would you change, and how?
Why does stating YOUR position require the “vast majority” to meet your standards first?
Surely explaining your own opinion is within your vast capabilities.
Which rules would you change, and how?
Why does stating YOUR position require the “vast majority” to meet your standards first?
Surely explaining your own opinion is within your vast capabilities.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:23 am to Klark Kent
quote:
You’re confident enough to declare the laws are being exploited and lecture everyone about their intelligence
I didn't really mention intelligence
Smart people can be swept up in cult-like/NPC thinking, too.
There have been several posters of above average to hide intelligence on here. If you've got swept up into the Q nonsense who then woke up later and realized how stupid they were falling into that trap. I was very happy to see certain posters do this exact thing.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I didn’t really mention intelligence
“Smooth brains” was your wording earlier. You followed this denial with another paragraph evaluating everyone’s intelligence. Excellent clarification.
Now that you’ve finished grading the board, which refugee rules would you change?
QAnon wasn’t the question.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:31 am to Klark Kent
quote:
Now that you’ve finished grading the board, which refugee rules would you change?
As has been stated in this thread, the intelligent policy isn't about the "refugee rules". Remove the domestic public incentives and this behavior will decrease on its own, naturally.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 7:49 am to BoomerandSooner
Their government has been seized by enemies. There is no political solution. They have to seize their country back.

Popular
Back to top


1








