- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UHC exec killer wasn’t read rights before questioning and warranties search conducted?
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:18 pm to 4cubbies
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:18 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
The government brings the charges against a defendant. The government provides the prosecution of the defendant. And you want the government to deliver the verdict.
What could go wrong?
So by that logic the government shouldn't provide counsel either.
1
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:19 pm to stout
quote:
People are stupid.
quote:
I would rather a professional t
A Professional what? Would this professional not be a person?
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:19 pm to stout
quote:
Have you even read the digital forensics they have against him?
I’m not saying he’s not guilty; I think he is.
Even serial killers are afforded Miranda rights. It’s the law.
This post was edited on 12/6/25 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:20 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
So by that logic the government shouldn't provide counsel either.
Touché.
I’m still not on board with pro juries though.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:20 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
A Professional what? Would this professional not be a person
Don't be obtuse. I wouldn't let a bus driver perform surgery on me.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:21 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I’m still not on board with pro juries though
I understand.
I can't argue with the charge of potential conflict of interest; it's a legit fear.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:22 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Why?
That state wasn’t confident they could prove he stole the backpack, I’m assuming.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:26 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Being detained for years without a trial is “a mild inconvenience”? Yikes.
quote:
Kalief Browder was held at Rikers Island jail for about three years without a trial after he was accused of stealing a backpack.
If you don't know how these two things aren't the same, you're a moron.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:26 pm to stout
quote:
you would have people educated in the law deciding legal matters
You want juries made up of only lawyers because it takes a law degree to look at evidence and determine if someone is telling the truth?
It would make more sense to argue that juries should be made up of only psychologists.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:28 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You want juries made up of only lawyers
No.
The concept would be some kind of associate's degree.
It's a program that doesn't yet exist.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:29 pm to 4cubbies
It’s doubtful he wasn’t read his rights. I would not believe that
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:29 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
You have to be more specific and say something like, "I am invoking my constitutional right to remain silent and have an attorney present during questioning," or something of that nature.
Really you don't even have to do that. You can simply say "I don't answer questions" or "I'd like to speak to an attorney" or what you said.
But then you also have to shut up and stop talking.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:30 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You want juries made up of only lawyers because it takes a law degree to look at evidence and determine if someone is telling the truth?
You need to be able to determine guilt or innocence as defined by the law not if they’re telling the truth.
Ffs
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:30 pm to 4cubbies
Why do posters keep engaging this SFP alter?
It plays the same game, that he does. Baiting posters into constantly re-engaging to his posts. 4cubbies has posted 63 times in just this thread alone. Sixty three!! Thats 1/4 of the posts in here
Just let it die already
It plays the same game, that he does. Baiting posters into constantly re-engaging to his posts. 4cubbies has posted 63 times in just this thread alone. Sixty three!! Thats 1/4 of the posts in here
Just let it die already
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:31 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Really you don't even have to do that. You can simply say "I don't answer questions" or "I'd like to speak to an attorney" or what you said.
I'm not an attorney, so I could be wrong, but I have read that courts have ruled in a least some cases against the invocation of rights with statements like, "I don't answer questions."
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:32 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
I'm not an attorney, so I could be wrong, but I have read that courts have ruled in a least some cases against the invocation of rights with statements like, "I don't answer questions."
Oh yeah for sure. That's not an invocation of your rights. You just aren't compelled to speak even if you don't invoke.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:33 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
SFP alter
A-woo-woo.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:35 pm to lurking
quote:
You need to be able to determine guilt or innocence as defined by the law n
And knowledge of laws is how this is determined? It has nothing to do with evidence or testimony?
Ffs.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:36 pm to 4cubbies
How many times have you been divorced
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:39 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
A-woo-woo.
Rude.
Page 12 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News