- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TX, FL, GA, TN, VA, AZ, etc have had more ICE arrests than MN and no shootings
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:52 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's not as easy as you think to have that sort of migration. They'd need to get new jobs and risk all the things along the way, and then have to register/sign up for new stuff and, again, increase the risk of being caught.
I doubt you have been around many illegals throughout the years. I have because I am in construction and everything you described is of no concern. They will load up a truck and switch states in a heartbeat.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:52 am to stout
The real question is why is New Mexico so low on that chart?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:While that may marginally increase the numbers of detentions/deportations, at this point it would also embolden these nutjobs to ramp up this type activity in other locations.
This is why the feds should be focusing on these areas instead of areas of resistance like MN.
If you want to maximize the number of ICE detentions/deportations, this is the intelligent strategy.
Focusing on places like MN indicates a strategy other than maximizing the detentions and deportations.
This is not a grassroots opposition, but rather a paid opposition. If it is seen as effective, more money and resources will be dedicated to replicating it in other locations.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:54 am to blueboy
quote:
The real question is why is New Mexico so low on that chart?
Not even Mexicans want to live in NM
No work there. They come here chasing work. It's why Lake Charles has a large Honduran population
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I didn't
quote:
]Focusing[/b] on places like MN
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If you want to maximize the number of ICE detentions/deportations, this is the intelligent strategy
That would entail leaving ICE agents, who are permanently based in MSP, alone with an angry populace.
Would you say they would remain safe? Would you say they cease activities they have been performing for 3 decades now and move them elsewhere?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
then have to register/sign up for new stuff
Sorry, I didn't think the illegals were abusing our generous social safety net.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:58 am to stout
quote:
Not even Mexicans want to live in NM
Gotta really love a whole lotta nothingness to live in most of NM.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:59 am to Onyx Aggie
quote:
at this point it would also embolden these nutjobs to ramp up this type activity in other locations.
quote:
Focusing on places like MN indicates a strategy other than maximizing the detentions and deportations.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:00 am to stout
quote:One hurricane and here they come a runnin!
They will load up a truck and switch states in a heartbeat.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:00 am to stout
Minnesota deserves everything they are getting and much worse.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:00 am to ruzil
Years ago, when a new law in Alabama went into effect, the whole population of illegals left the state. SFP acting like illegals won't drop everything and move is naive.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No it's my suggestion for a more rational and efficient policy strategy.
I have asked multiple times: what is your more rational strategy? When are you going to comment on walz and Frey telling the feds to pound sand and that immigration law won’t be enforced in Minnesota?
Aren’t you some hyper-principled “no one is above the law” type? Why do you only want to enforce the law in TX and FL now?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:00 am to SDVTiger
And?
The point is removing resources from inefficient locations (MN) and putting them in areas where they are operating currently with more efficiency.
Again, my argument implies they are operating all over, with data on the locations where the feds are getting the best results. That was baked into my comment.
You just don't read good
The point is removing resources from inefficient locations (MN) and putting them in areas where they are operating currently with more efficiency.
Again, my argument implies they are operating all over, with data on the locations where the feds are getting the best results. That was baked into my comment.
You just don't read good
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:02 am to SlowFlowPro
We want those fricking Somalians out of here
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:02 am to G2160
quote:
I have asked multiple times: what is your more rational strategy?
The comment is the more rational version of Trump's policy
If you mean changing the policy, focusing on criminals and employers and focusing on areas where local LEO will cooperate is a much smarter strategy with a vastly decreased chance of conflict.
quote:
Why do you only want to enforce the law in TX and FL now?
That isn't the argument. That's a straw man.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:02 am to biglego
quote:
We want those fricking Somalians out of here
quote:
Focusing on places like MN indicates a strategy other than maximizing the detentions and deportations.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:03 am to stout
quote:
SFP acting like illegals won't drop everything and move is naive.
It's a different climate right now with federal enforcement.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is why the feds should be focusing on these areas instead of areas of resistance like MN.
“If people resist the laws, they shouldn’t be enforced”
Popular
Back to top



1







