- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tulsi releases incriminating Fauci comms & docs on her final day as DNI
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:22 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:22 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Either he rats, perjures, or is in contempt for refusing to answer.
There are multiple other ways to avoid directly answering that question without the potential consequences you're trying to create.
It's over. They out-maneuvered the DOJ. Acceptance is the first step.
Learn and move on.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:25 am to hawgfaninc
Always thought it was odd to get pardoned even though you weren't convicted of any crimes...
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:26 am to HubbaBubba
quote:Twitter Link
Gabbard Declassifies Documents Alleging Fauci Funded Wuhan Gain-of-Function Research
Last updated
30 minutes ago
Outgoing Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released documents on June 18 alleging Dr. Anthony Fauci directed millions in U.S. funds to risky gain-of-function research at China's Wuhan Institute of Virology and worked with officials to downplay the lab-leak theory for COVID-19's origins.
The files, from a yearlong review including whistleblower accounts and emails, show Fauci influencing assessments toward a natural origin and contradicting his 2024 congressional testimony. Gabbard thanked President Trump for the opportunity and referred retaliation claims against lab-leak proponents to the IC Inspector General, amid reactions praising her actions and calls from Sen. Rand Paul for prosecution despite Biden's prior pardon of Fauci.
quote:Twitter Link
Gabbard Declassifies Docs on Flawed 2019 Trump Whistleblower Probe
Last updated
1 hour ago
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released documents alleging former Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson mishandled a 2019 complaint about Trump's call with Ukraine's Zelensky, bypassing standard procedures by interviewing only four people with limited direct knowledge.
The materials claim this rushed the complaint to Congress as an 'urgent concern,' sparking the House impeachment inquiry that December. Gabbard referred Atkinson and the whistleblower for potential criminal probes, tying it to broader questions about the 2017 Russia election assessment, while critics call it recycled claims and media reports say the files fall short of proving conspiracy.
Fauci was not referred for potential criminal probes because of his pardon.
It has been presumed the pardon challenge(s) are not hàppening.. opening up a can or worms for all Presidential pardon powers.
Gabbard referred Atkinson and the whistleblower for potential criminal probes, tying it to broader questions about the 2017 Russia election assessment. Time is of the essence...
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 7:27 am
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:30 am to jp4lsu
quote:Paul never closed the deal. As with Markwayne Mullen, he was more interested in making personal points with Fauci than he was in snapping the beartrap shut.
I don't understand this take. What is a senator supposed to do more than expose wrong doing in a hearing? They can't go arrest anybody themselves.
Fauci constantly dodged in predicable ways ... i.e., changing definitions of GOF. Instead of asking the lying POS under whose authority had he changed the definitions, Paul would nit pick as to who was using the accurate definition. Fauci responded that Paul had no expertise, and did not know what he was talking about. Paul would take the bait, and that is the track further intercourse followed.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:31 am to AlterEd
quote:
Rand Paul is calling for the pardon to be challenged
President Autopen was unable to enter into any sort of legally binding contract, due to inability to mentally comprehend almost everything.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:33 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Paul never closed the deal.
He sent a DOJ referral. Nothing else he can do.
quote:
Fauci constantly dodged in predicable ways ... i.e., changing definitions of GOF. Instead of asking the lying POS under whose authority had he changed the definitions, Paul would nit pick as to who was using the accurate definition. Fauci responded that Paul had no expertise, and did not know what he was talking about. Paul would take the bait, and that is the track further intercourse followed.
You're describing perfectly why your plan to re-summon Fauci won't work. Glad we can close that door.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There are multiple other ways to avoid directly answering that question without the potential consequences you're trying to create.
"As far as I recall...", "I don't recall", "If memory serves me". Then there is the 5th.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:35 am to Tigergreg
quote:
Then there is the 5th.
People will say, at the same time (1) he can't use the 5A b/c of the pardon AND (2) he's potentially subject to state crimes, and not understand the contradictions involved.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:36 am to imjustafatkid
Yep, they seem Slow to Flow to these threads.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:37 am to SlowFlowPro
Stop acting like it’s not been stated that the DoJ had a role in all of this. FFS.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:No there aren't.
There are multiple other ways to avoid directly answering that question without the potential consequences you're trying to create.
Not when Fauci has no clue as to what information is in possession of the investigators. First and foremost, the lying, slime bucket has to be exposed. Reissue questions he previously perjuriously answered. Demand he come clean about manipulation of the Jan - Apr 2020 CV19 origin "studies". Grant one of the bit players immunity behind the scenes to verify veracity of Fauci's claims.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:38 am to SlowFlowPro
Non sequitur.
I said Fauci gave false testimony.
I said Fauci gave false testimony.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:38 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Stop acting like it’s not been stated that the DoJ had a role in all of this. FFS.
They had the only role, once Rand sent the referral.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:39 am to Hangover Haven
quote:
Always thought it was odd to get pardoned even though you weren't convicted of any crimes...
Biden's autopen being cute. They (his staff) thought they could cover every perceived crime with the stroke of a pen.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:39 am to Tigergreg
quote:Not when immunity has been granted.
Then there is the 5th.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:40 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Non sequitur.
You don't know what that means, and you just used it in the most ironic way
Bannon was held in contempt for non-compliance
Fauci complied. You can't logically compare a contempt for non-compliance to a person who fully complied
So try again, your example had no relevance or rhetoric value.
quote:
I said Fauci gave false testimony.
Has nothing to do with Bannon, who gave no testimony.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:40 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Under Biden’s control.
What does that have to do with Rand Paul's role?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
People will say, at the same time (1) he can't use the 5A b/c of the pardon AND (2) he's potentially subject to state crimes, and not understand the contradictions involved.
I think you are correct.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:41 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Not when Fauci has no clue as to what information is in possession of the investigators. First and foremost, the lying, slime bucket has to be exposed. Reissue questions he previously perjuriously answered. Demand he come clean about manipulation of the Jan - Apr 2020 CV19 origin "studies". Grant one of the bit players immunity behind the scenes to verify veracity of Fauci's claims.
You're LARPing. Emotionally, it seems.
Popular
Back to top



2





