- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tulsi releases incriminating Fauci comms & docs on her final day as DNI
Posted on 6/20/26 at 8:44 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 6/20/26 at 8:44 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:58 am to hawgfaninc
Posted on 7/5/26 at 11:10 am to CrystalPreserves
quote:
The convenient thing about election theft conspiracies is that every lack of evidence becomes evidence.
No the thing about the failure of election theft 'conspiracies' is the demand that nothing will be investigating UNLESS you can prove that whatever small amount of fraud you can PROVE right now is enough to 'change the result' of the entire election.
Which is an impossible task.
UNLESS the ones who are in charge of each precinct demand that THEIR portion of the overall election is done without fraud, we can never just 'go to court' to prove whether or not we had a 'fair election' or not.
It cannot be done, as long as individual election boards are in on the fraud.
They MUST demand elections a pure as snow and not allow ANY unverified vote to be counted.
YES - that means that someone can make an honest mistake and not have his vote counted. Too bad - do better next time.
I have gotten traffic tickets that are not at all what defines my normal behavior - I just make a mistake of not paying attention at the right moment, or was ready to trade a chance for a ticket to get to a place 'on time' - I pay up.
But what we have now are hundreds of not thousands of local boards who are in on the fraud - but can rely on saying = "we don't have to check this because what you are alleging would not change the result even if true" === this is NONSENSE and an abject invitation to cheat.
Popular
Back to top

0





