- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker vs Huckabee debate has posted
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:34 pm to EphesianArmor
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:34 pm to EphesianArmor
great summation video
would I rather be a drug addict prostitute standing before God on judgement day? Or Mike Huckabee?
I'd rather be the drug addict prostitute
would I rather be a drug addict prostitute standing before God on judgement day? Or Mike Huckabee?
I'd rather be the drug addict prostitute
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:37 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
Yeah, Huckabee seems to have lost the (Christian) plot.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:39 pm to wfallstiger
quote:
Just passing thru....Revelation 21:15-17
Revelation 21:15-17
New International Version
15 The angel who talked with me had a measuring rod of gold to measure the city, its gates and its walls. 16 The city was laid out like a square, as long as it was wide. He measured the city with the rod and found it to be 12,000 stadia[a] in length, and as wide and high as it is long. 17 The angel measured the wall using human measurement, and it was 144 cubits[b] thick.[c]
Revelation 21:16 That is, about 1,400 miles or about 2,200 kilometers
Revelation 21:17 That is, about 200 feet or about 65 meters
Revelation 21:17 Or high
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:43 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
?
They’re both odd & both went into the interview with agendas. Agreeing with either shows you have the same agenda. It wasn’t a debate or interview. It was two people more concerned with advancing their agenda than debating.
They’re both odd & both went into the interview with agendas. Agreeing with either shows you have the same agenda. It wasn’t a debate or interview. It was two people more concerned with advancing their agenda than debating.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:48 pm to Bourbon Bebe
quote:
Clay Higgins has an Israel flag hanging in his office. He has an "I stand with Israel" sign next to his office door. He is far from the only one. They don't even hide it.
the Congress men and women with the least amount of personal financial means when they go to DC are the most vulnerable and easily acquired by AIPAC
Clay Higgins is a perfect example. When he replaced Charles Boustany AIPAC put on a fullcourt press of Higgins because Boustany was a very public Pro-Palestine Republican. Higgins was a SLPS officer with a following as cajun john wayne, he was also pretty broke
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:49 pm to davyjones
quote:
If you believe all of that’s the case then I think our business is done here. Oh, and pro tip…..I’d steer clear of HRV’s crazy arse if I were you.
That's right Utah Cajun. The First Baptist church deacon Davy Scofield would like for you to steer away from anyone who has read Galatians and several other books.
or maybe it's Church of God Pentecostal deaconship for Davy Scofield
I think his real name is Lieutenant Clinton Morgan
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:51 pm to Jack Ruby
Mike is everything that is wrong Evangelical Christianity. Israel apologists because they don’t know how to interpret the Bible.
Qatarlson, is correct about Israel but very wrong about Islam.
Qatarlson, is correct about Israel but very wrong about Islam.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:51 pm to cajunangelle
Mike is a theologian…? Lolz
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:31 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Agreeing with either shows you have the same agenda.
total BS dude
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:41 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
If it was a debate, I’d agree with you
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:06 pm to hawgfaninc
Being anti Israel just shows how brainwashed someone can be. It would be foolish to turn our backs on them on may levels
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:13 pm to NashvilleTider
They haven’t even so much as bothered to google what the stated benefits are derived from this relationship that exist now and have been so over time. Just a damn google, even if you don’t agree with a bit of it. I’ve asked several times, “if you were forced to come up with the best possible benefit you can, just one,” I don’t think I’ve seen one attempt at it. How can you be so vehemently opposed to something when you don’t even know a thing about the other side of the argument??
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:33 pm to davyjones
quote:
You don’t think we have our own “proprietary” intelligence, as well as vet any intelligence from foreign sources before we rely upon it for any action?
Well, just weeks before we bombed their nuclear sites Tulsi Gabbard said that Iran was not making nuclear weapons.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:36 pm to Jack Ruby
The comment from Huckabee that irritated me was when he pivoted on the U.S. military to bolster the IDF. It really showed his hierarchy of allegiance.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:38 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
Being anti Israel just shows how brainwashed someone can be. It would be foolish to turn our backs on them on may levels
Why? They’ve turned their backs on us many times
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:38 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
Well, let’s see the transcript or quote on that and make sure we’re in agreement on that conclusion.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:42 pm to davyjones
quote:
“The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.”
March 26, 2025 to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
Popular
Back to top



1





