- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker drops a 1+ hour conversation on CHEMTRAILS
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:15 pm to Paul Redeker
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:15 pm to Paul Redeker
quote:
Not that I disagree with your stance in here but saying "Where are the tanks?" 20 times in this thread is retarded. Literally every major airport has a tank terminal with multiple large liquid storage tanks. What do you think aircraft run on?
Jet A-1. A kerosene like fuel. It’s stored in underground Jet A-1 fuel tanks in large airports and above ground in some smaller airports. It’s t trucked in from facilities that distribute Jet A-1 fuel that is obtained from the crude oil refining process. It can be verified and sampled.
See? An answer. A direct answer. No “Google it”, no “watch the video”, no “why won’t you just understand?!?!?”
You know what stops the question? An answer. A deflection doesn’t. A red herring doesn’t. A ramble doesn’t.
An answer. If you have an extreme difficulty in answering a very very very very basic question…. Maybe it’s time for reflection? Maybe?
This post was edited on 11/10/25 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:21 pm to Tiger Khan
quote:
Despite looking and feeling like absolute shite -- you still believe your diet and meds are good for you.
I feel fine. Everyone I know feels fine. I see other people bicycling, jogging, swimming, running, I see elderly people at the park walking laps, I see kids running and playing.
Where is this location where everyone feels terrible?
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:23 pm to Tiger Khan
quote:
Stop there. Didn't read anything else
And you are the one telling people to research, watch, and read?
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:27 pm to theballguy
quote:
Tucker's going the wrong way. Needs to get back to conservative-friendly subjects, not weirdo-friendly subjects. Just my opinion. He's mostly lost me especially with his frick you Jews agenda lately.
This IS a conservative-friendly subject.
Which states have outlawed aerial geoengineering? Massachusetts, Vermont, California...no Montana, Florida and Tennessee.
As for the "frick the Jews" agenda, Tucker is solidly America First. I have never heard him say anything negative about Jews. It's a cheap trick to conflate protesting Israeli influence on America policy with anti-Jewish sentiment.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:28 pm to Tiger Khan
quote:
we are talking about zigzag patterns that encompass an entire sky after a few hours
Yes, those are contrails.
This thread is like a flame and you're one of the moths.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:31 pm to dickkellog
quote:
tucker's ready to believe you! he'll say anything for money
The Russians in particular are grateful for this.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:41 pm to CleverUserName
quote:In the fog of a chemtrail ... or a mosquito truck
You know they are gonna find Bigfoot any day from those eye witness accounts.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:42 pm to Tiger Khan
quote:those are condensation trails from the moisture in the jet exhaust. Every single jet plane in existence creates those at at some altitude depending on the temperature and relative humidity conditions in the atmosphere that day. Military pilots, especially stealth aircraft pilots have to very aware of them as flying through 'the cons' gives your position away visually for hundreds of miles. Dont know why people are so scared of water vapor
planes with "vapor trails"
This post was edited on 11/10/25 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:50 pm to SirWinston
As someone who has followed Wigington for many years, he still hasn't established any correlation...much less causation....between alleged chemtrails and the high concentrations of heavy metals found on the ground.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 5:42 pm to SirWinston
quote:
If you watch the video for just 10 minutes
If you think I’m going to watch that brain rot bullshite then you’re sorely mistaken.
You people really need to go do your own research and see what cloud seeding is and what it’s limitations are.
Maybe next Newsom can say Trump is using it to cause their drought! God forbid and arid climate not have much rain
Posted on 11/10/25 at 5:51 pm to SirWinston
I don’t understand the downvotes or how people still call it a conspiracy. Our own epa director admitted in court filings it was real
Posted on 11/10/25 at 5:57 pm to Sweep Da Leg
quote:
Our own epa director admitted in court filings it was real
This is a lie.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 5:58 pm to SirWinston
Stopped watching when that dude compared the heat of someone's breath to the heat of a jet engine.... 
This post was edited on 11/10/25 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 11/10/25 at 6:17 pm to Sweep Da Leg
quote:
I don’t understand the downvotes or how people still call it a conspiracy. Our own epa director admitted in court filings it was real
Lee Zeldin put out this slick little video a few months ago after the EPA finished its "investigation" in advance of the launch of the EPA's new webpage about chemtrails:
On that webpage you can find this:
quote:
What are “chemtrails”?
“Chemtrails” is a shortening of the term “chemical trails”. It is a term some people use to inaccurately claim that contrails resulting from routine air traffic are actually an intentional release of dangerous chemicals or biological agents at high altitudes for a variety of nefarious purposes, including population control, mind control, or attempts to geoengineer Earth or modify the weather.
It should be noted that chemicals are sometimes intentionally sprayed from aircraft for legitimate purposes like firefighting or farming, but these are well-documented occurrences, regulated, and used for specific legitimate purposes. Releases of this type are from low-flying propeller aircraft, not high-altitude jets. For more information, see the next section below.
EPA proactively works with other federal agencies to monitor air traffic for any and all potential, dangerous activities and will continue to do so.
EPA is aware that some members of the public are concerned about unusual contrails they see in the sky or reports about geoengineering and dangerous chemicals being sprayed from jet aircraft at high altitudes. Some members of the public have been concerned when they see low flying planes spraying fields (known as crop dusting. See more info below). When witnessing these phenomena, it is reasonable to ask questions and inquire further to understand what you are seeing. More information on geoengineering. For more information on when chemicals are sprayed from airplanes for legitimate purposes, see below.
quote:
Are contrails related to geoengineering or weather modification?
The federal government is not aware of there ever being a contrail intentionally formed over the United States for the purpose of geoengineering or weather modification. Geoengineering encompasses a broad range of activities that intentionally attempt to cool the Earth or remove gases from the atmosphere. A subset of these activities is intended to cool the Earth by modifying the amount of sunlight reaching Earth’s surface. This is a subject currently going through intense domestic and international public debate, research, and scrutiny for good reason. More information about geoengineering and weather modification.
This post was edited on 11/10/25 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 11/10/25 at 6:19 pm to Hangover Haven
quote:
Stopped watching when that dude compared the heat of someone's breath to the heat of a jet engine....
Cmon mane!! He’s an expert! He said so!
Posted on 11/11/25 at 7:02 am to SirWinston
Listening and so far I'm confused about a couple of things.
Our technology and understanding of global climate science in the 1950's (because a gov operation like this doesn't just get cranked up in a few months and then is implemented) doesn't resemble current day advancements or knowledge.
For this to be true, we'd have to have fully understood what needed to be done, had the ability to believe we could do something about it, and the means, for 60+ years.
And what have we accomplished in all this? If true, where's the progress?
The insanity of covid, from its origins, the spread, the lethality, how to deal with it, mask and shot propaganda.... I get it. The precedent has been set in stone. Trust the science and anyone who doesn't is cast as a tin foil hat wearing kook.
This guest isn't all wrong. But he's also barking up the wrong tree.
He speaks of China being able to produce blizzards, and conveniently forgets that China HAD a winter * Olympics with virtually no snow. A massive embarrassment for the CCP. Why did they allow that to happen?
He talks about the blizzard in NOLA. Tucker blanks, says he doesn't remember that. It's rare, yes, but snow does fall in Gulf coast areas, even in Florida.
He cherry picks events and data while ignoring the massive amounts of information all across the board.
*How Beijing will combat little snowfall
by: Scott Roberts
Posted: Feb 4, 2022 / 02:39 PM EST
Updated: Feb 4, 2022 / 02:39 PM EST
Our technology and understanding of global climate science in the 1950's (because a gov operation like this doesn't just get cranked up in a few months and then is implemented) doesn't resemble current day advancements or knowledge.
For this to be true, we'd have to have fully understood what needed to be done, had the ability to believe we could do something about it, and the means, for 60+ years.
And what have we accomplished in all this? If true, where's the progress?
The insanity of covid, from its origins, the spread, the lethality, how to deal with it, mask and shot propaganda.... I get it. The precedent has been set in stone. Trust the science and anyone who doesn't is cast as a tin foil hat wearing kook.
This guest isn't all wrong. But he's also barking up the wrong tree.
He speaks of China being able to produce blizzards, and conveniently forgets that China HAD a winter * Olympics with virtually no snow. A massive embarrassment for the CCP. Why did they allow that to happen?
He talks about the blizzard in NOLA. Tucker blanks, says he doesn't remember that. It's rare, yes, but snow does fall in Gulf coast areas, even in Florida.
He cherry picks events and data while ignoring the massive amounts of information all across the board.
*How Beijing will combat little snowfall
by: Scott Roberts
Posted: Feb 4, 2022 / 02:39 PM EST
Updated: Feb 4, 2022 / 02:39 PM EST
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 7:22 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:19 am to Indefatigable
I wasnt being serious. Lighten up.
Popular
Back to top

0







