- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker Carlsons guest fuels theory that BiBi is suspicious Re Charlie Kirks assassination
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:52 am to JiminyCricket
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:52 am to JiminyCricket
quote:Exactly. Well said...
I hadn't heard that audio but your framing of it isn't very representative of the content. She mentioned one line about merchandise sales in a 2:30 minute speech on how crazy the numbers were for the Kirk memorial, including the amount of viewers and newly registered voters. She spent the rest of the call celebrating how the gospel was spread and encouraging the staffers who were listening in moving forward. This just didn't seem that damning to me upon listening. To represent the audio as Erica Krik taking a victory lap over merch sales is pretty misrepresentative to what was actually said.
Also, people react in different way to tragedy. I remember a friend of mine that was only a teenager years ago died of cancer and when I went to his service, I spoke with his entire family, mom, dad and sisters and we smiled and even laughed a bit while conversing, all while his coffin was a few feet away at the altar of the church. Hell, his dad and I even briefly chatted about golf. Does that mean they didn't love my friend and weren't broken at his loss?
Candace Owen's has been pontificating as 'investigations' as taking every crazy email, and background of Erika"s great greats in her family tree..
She shows herself in jealousy of she knew Charlie better...With zero facts or evidence but chuckies bride whackodoodle nonsense...
This nonsense has been repeated every day for 6 mos now, and makes headline news So it is repeated as 'Erika Kirk is like a robot and acted strange on zoom calls'
Candace has blamed everyone and their mother... as a crazed ex GF that was rejected strange grief.
Now Tucker has a podcast and builds up this guy in his beginning monologue... as the arbitrator of pure truth and facts and blames BiBi like a coward.
1
Posted on 3/12/26 at 9:59 am to cajunangelle
I'm intrigued to hear the dissenting opinion to my previous posts. I'm not saying Erika Kirk is some saint but using a single line of supporting information on merchandise sales on a zoom call to make the point to the TPUSA staff on how far the reach of the memorial went seems reachy to me.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:00 am to cajunangelle
quote:opinion rejected
Bret Weinstein
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:03 am to JiminyCricket
quote:
I'm intrigued to hear the dissenting opinion to my previous posts. I'm not saying Erika Kirk is some saint but using a single line of supporting information on merchandise sales on a zoom call to make the point to the TPUSA staff on how far the reach of the memorial went seems reachy to me.
I think your point about mischaracterization is fair. However, I am sticking to my point that she was treating her husbands memorial service like a TPUSA marketing event.
Everyone has a right to grieve in their own way, but she has run to the spotlight since his death and it is strange.
And no I don’t think she had Charlie killed lol
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:08 am to cajunangelle
People are too weak to understand that TPUSA was Charlies entire life and it was soooooooo weird and strange that after he was assassinated that they wanted to work on making it better.. that's just unheard of!!
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:09 am to GreatLakesTiger24
His opinion was NOT rejected by Tucker Carlson. It was highlighted to be from a very astute truthful great man.
Watch the beginning of Tuckers podcast. I wull post the link in a minute. You would think Weinstein was a Saint that speaks nothing but truth. EVER! :Insert Tuckers cocky laugh here:
Watch the beginning of Tuckers podcast. I wull post the link in a minute. You would think Weinstein was a Saint that speaks nothing but truth. EVER! :Insert Tuckers cocky laugh here:
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:09 am to msutiger
quote:
I think your point about mischaracterization is fair. However, I am sticking to my point that she was treating her husbands memorial service like a TPUSA marketing event.
Everyone has a right to grieve in their own way, but she has run to the spotlight since his death and it is strange.
And no I don’t think she had Charlie killed lol
I suppose that theoretically could possibly be the case. I just tend to tread lightly when it comes to how people respond publically to death. I remember watching Monty Williams speaking at his wife's memorial and some folks would find it absurd that he would speak that calmly and give a message of forgiveness to the driver that killed his wife.
Is it possible that she is an attention whore and couldn't wait to take her place in the spotlight? Sure. Is it possible she loved her husband and threw herself into continuing his legacy as part of the greiving process? Sure. Truth is none of us really know.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:11 am to GreatLakesTiger24
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:14 am to okietiger
quote:
Y’all don’t even have, at bare minimum, a slight concern that Charlie had started to question Israel?
Everybody questions Israel all the time. If Israel took out everybody who questioned them, it would impact world population numbers.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:16 am to cajunangelle
quote:
As said already BiBi was accused as they say in Great Britain---straight away.
and he dignified the accusation by responding. the smart thing to do was just dismiss it as conspiracy and not respond at all. bibi is definitely smart enough to realize that
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:16 am to GreatLakesTiger24
"Weinstein is not an expert on military strategy" but he always speaks the truth and is a great guest...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:21 am to okietiger
quote:
Y’all don’t even have, at bare minimum, a slight concern that Charlie had started to question Israel? And also seemed hesitant to do so when he did? And then was killed? Not even a little bit weird timing? Aight…
There is a group on here that will not question any of that stuff while simultaneously believing the election was stolen and the Covid vaccine is a dangerous depopulation tool.
I’m not arguing Israel killed Charlie Kirk.
I have no evidence to support that.
Do I believe Israel would kill an American media person if it advanced their agenda? Without question and I don’t think they’d feel bad about it for a minute based on the importance they put on their agenda and what they believe about non-Jews.
If people want to look at this objectively it should be like this:
Did they have motive?
-absolutely they were upset about him criticizing their actions and their role in US domestic politics
Did they have the means?
- Absolutely, the Mossad is the most capable intel group in the world and has carried out these types of attacks and web searches in Tel Aviv spiked just before the attack
Did they have the opportunity?
-I haven’t seen any evidence to support that yet
This post was edited on 3/12/26 at 10:25 am
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:24 am to Nurbis
quote:
If Israel took out everybody who questioned them, it would impact world population numbers.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:29 am to 632627
quote:
Before anyone asked?
Yes, before anyone asked. In early examination by Carroll and Owens, they even brought up the fact that Netanyahu went on the record as saying Israel had nothing to do with it.
Netanyahu went to X while Kirk was still bleeding. Then he had his interview with Greta, where he denied involvement. After those two pieces, questions were asked. The timeline was always weird.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:49 am to GreatLakesTiger24
I will give them this... if this is true it is tacky AF and weirdly suspicious
Can anyone verify this is a real pic? I thought it was just the golden pager? Does the pager detach? Did the USSS approve it?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Can anyone verify this is a real pic? I thought it was just the golden pager? Does the pager detach? Did the USSS approve it?
This post was edited on 3/12/26 at 10:53 am
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:49 am to cajunangelle
Tucker has been in that rubber room for 4 years but idiots still bought his schtick
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News