- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/10/23 at 10:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/10/23 at 10:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
And yes Orgeron was an idiot who put a perfect season in needless danger with his dipshit decisions.
0
Posted on 7/10/23 at 10:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It is hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person". Bill Murray.
No doubt some things in life are certain. Death. Taxes. And leftists pulling out the “I’m just too smart for you to understand my argument” card when they have gotten their arse handed to them in a debate.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 11:01 pm to captdalton
Let the cope flow
Posted on 7/10/23 at 11:02 pm to captdalton
I'll post a history of my avatar and sig pics tomorrow for you
Posted on 7/10/23 at 11:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
Don’t on my account. I don’t care. Nothing you post will change my opinion of you.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did not exist in March 2020
So freaking what? The sheltering in place protocols you were advocating for were based on CDC & Mockingbird Media fear-porn propaganda.
quote:
Did not exist when I made that post.
So freaking what? The lockdown protocols you were advocating for were based on CDC & Mockingbird Media fear-porn propaganda.
quote:
Did not exist when I made the post.
So freaking what? The mask protocols you were advocating for were based on CDC & Mockingbird Media fear-porn propaganda.
In sum, you were suffering from a fit of moral panic based primarily on orchestrated agitprop campaigns, the very thing you say you are seeking to expose in this very thread!
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Orgeron is a fricking idiot. It's an accepted fact now but was not popular with a large population of dullards. It takes a strong man to stand up against the mob.
It takes a delusional egoist to believe that calling a football coach a dolt is a brave moral stance. Your delusions of grandeur are certifiable!
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 6:47 am
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'll post a history of my avatar and sig pics tomorrow for you
Please do!
This thread continues to deliver!
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SFP has taken his article and comments about the movie and used them as his own verbatim.
More lies.
Your beliefs mirror the soy boi that penned that drivel.
Which is exactly what you do. You find something that looks "smart" and latch on to it.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:36 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
This thread continues to deliver!
He hasn't given up on dragging everyone into his rut his ego will not let him climb out of it.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:41 am to captdalton
quote:
Nothing you post will change my opinion of you.
Somewhere between "TrAfFiCkInG dOeSnT HaPpEn OfTeN hErE" and the satanic panic is the truth.
Hes terrified that if he agrees trafficking is a real issue, that he will be seen as supporting the "satanic panic."
His ego destroys his objectivity.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:46 am to Madking
quote:
Miles Klee, alphabet mafia, Marxist libtard.
You might be on to something.
Though, SFP envisions himself as some independent and wholly original thought leader on this forum — from COVID-1984 to the war in the hinterlands of Eastern Europe — SFP repeatedly regurgitates libtard media talking points as a matter of course.
Regardless of whether Klee is SFP’s guiding light, the following comments by Klee certainly sound like something SFP would write:
Rolling Stone Has Meltdown Over 'Sound of Freedom', Film Continues to Destroy Expectations….
…Here’s Klee’s summing it up: “Ballard, Caviezel, and others of their ilk had primed the public to accept ‘Sound of Freedom’ as a documentary rather than delusion by fomenting moral panic for years over this grossly exaggerated ‘epidemic’ of child sex-trafficking, much of it funneling people into conspiracist rabbit holes and QAnon communities. In short, I was at the movies with people who were there to see their worst fears confirmed.”
OK. First of all, child sex-trafficking is an objectively heinous, monstrous and evil stain on humanity.
Why would you ever, ever, ever downplay it by calling it “grossly exaggerated”? Even if you truly, genuinely and dementedly believed that child sex-trafficking is just something that happens in life, why would you say that part out loud?
Could you imagine an actual survivor of child sex-trafficking reading these words? That goes beyond just cruelty and callousness.
Now, if Klee had issues with the movie’s pacing, plot or acting (he does) that is more than fair game for him to critique. But this review takes things to a dark and disturbing place by all but dismissing child sex-trafficking as little more than a made-up boogeyman.
It’s sad that this needs to be said, but for anyone who thinks like Klee: Even if just one child has been sex-trafficked, that’s one too many…
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:50 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
SFP repeatedly regurgitates libtard media talking points as a matter of course.
Word for word.
I think theres probably a chick involved.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:52 am to Toomer Deplorable
In 2014, CBS News did a piece on Ballard, praising his efforts. What changed?
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 6:53 am
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:57 am to Jjdoc
quote:
It's wild to see the media go after this movie!
Not it's not. It's typical and Jim Caviezel predicted it. He said "those that have the most to hide will be the loudest voices against the truth of this movie."
There's a reason the U.S. is the hub of child trafficking.
It's rooted in our political leaders and hollywood. The MSM are the propaganda arm of those evil groups. It was predictable that the usual suspects would come out against this movie and attack everyone who and a part in it.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 7:02 am to SlowFlowPro
When I posted this yesterday ...
Instead of unnecessary deflection and descension down a rabbit hole of what does and doesn't comprise "anecdote," bastardized trafficking law and abuse was that base premise. This should have been your answer:
As a nonlawyer, I had no idea "a pimp who has a prostitute under 21 could be charged with engaging in "human trafficking", even if no actual force, threats, etc. are used." That law, assuming your description is correct, is horrible. It validates your continuing emphases in this thread about government intrusion.
I don't think it validates dismissal of child trafficking, or a focus there. But it is a perfect example of a government bait-and-switch.
e.g., The Government screams, "Look at this case of 14y/o's being trafficked! Let's get tough on trafficking" and change the law to include anyone less than 21y/o as unable to consent, and therefore trafficked.
As the saying goes, "I guess that's why we can't have nice things."
quote:... I was looking for a foundational premise which I suspected was there, but was just not evident. Perhaps it was buried in one of the previous 30 pages?
As you've taken a fairly strong position without much actual evidence to back it, I presumed you were dealing with personal anecdotes (perhaps client experiences) as influences of your thoughts. I'd still be interested as to what those are.
Instead of unnecessary deflection and descension down a rabbit hole of what does and doesn't comprise "anecdote," bastardized trafficking law and abuse was that base premise. This should have been your answer:
quote:Simple. Boom! I get it.
The "force" element in trafficking that is often presumed is now based on age. In LA, it's not even 18 (it's 21). So any pimp who has a prostitute under 21 is engaging in "human trafficking", even if no actual force, threats, etc. are used.
As a nonlawyer, I had no idea "a pimp who has a prostitute under 21 could be charged with engaging in "human trafficking", even if no actual force, threats, etc. are used." That law, assuming your description is correct, is horrible. It validates your continuing emphases in this thread about government intrusion.
I don't think it validates dismissal of child trafficking, or a focus there. But it is a perfect example of a government bait-and-switch.
e.g., The Government screams, "Look at this case of 14y/o's being trafficked! Let's get tough on trafficking" and change the law to include anyone less than 21y/o as unable to consent, and therefore trafficked.
As the saying goes, "I guess that's why we can't have nice things."
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 7:11 am
Posted on 7/11/23 at 7:08 am to Snipe
quote:
He said "those that have the most to hide will be the loudest voices against the truth of this movie."
The entertainment industry is the most perverse industry people will tolerate.
And they shouldn't. If any industry should be put under a microscope, its that one.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 7:33 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
So freaking what?
Why did you bring them up in reference to a post prior to their existence?
It makes no logical sense.
quote:
The sheltering in place protocols you were advocating for
This is a lie
quote:
were based on CDC & Mockingbird Media fear-porn propaganda
No. Those didn't exist at the time of the comment.
How could a comment prior to the protocols be based on the protocols? Did I have a time machine?
Posted on 7/11/23 at 7:39 am to captdalton
Posted on 7/11/23 at 7:40 am to Jjdoc
40 pages of people arguing about molesting kids. Without looking I'm guessing it's the autistic aggie and slow pro who are taking up for the child rapist
Page 44 of 49
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News