Started By
Message

re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"

Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452479 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

I have vacillated myself between wondering if SFP is truly an autistic circus clown or simply a dedicated troll. Like Hank promoting explicit BDSM kink in public as innocuous fun appropriate for all ages, this act has become parody of itself in this thread.

You won't even answer simple questions (while I have).

You won't give any reasoned explanations either (while I have).

Think about how that makes you look.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283280 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:49 pm to
quote:


I have vacillated myself between wondering if SFP is truly an autistic circus clown or simply a dedicated troll.


its this.

My older brother is similar. Bless his heart. MBA, CPA, but his wife has to pick his clothes out for him and his kids don't allow him into family discussions. He needs to be "explained" to others.

He picked out the music at my moms funeral and everyone was
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
69748 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Can't imagine what his hard drive holds!!




Or what he is holding while looking through his hard drive
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
This is going to ... blow ... your ... mind.

It is ENTIRELY possible for a person BOTH to oppose child trafficking and ALSO to think that a given film (or article or other presentation) is full of Q-anon nonsense.

Is THIS film full of lunatic conspiracy theories? No idea. Clearly, author Charles Bramesco thinks so. When it comes out on video streaming, I will probably watch it and decide for myself.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452479 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

It is ENTIRELY possible for a person BOTH to oppose child trafficking and ALSO to think that a given film (or article or other presentation) is full of Q-anon nonsense.

They are way too linear and spoonfed to understand how to hold 2 views like that

Toomers just walked into a few rakes with his linear thinking.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
96142 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 2:09 pm to
Charles Bramesco is an enemy of the people
Posted by 2020_reVISION
Richmond,VA
Member since Dec 2020
3278 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

quote:
New UN report advocates for decriminalizing sex with minors


IIRC, the report is actually about minor:minor sex being legal. Did you read the report?



Where does it explicitly make that distinction?
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
21536 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:08 pm to
quote:


Think about how that makes you look.




The very fact you keep bumping this thread clearly indicates you have no clue how you come across to the rest of this board.

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120687 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Is THIS film full of lunatic conspiracy theories? No idea. Clearly, author Charles Bramesco thinks so. When it comes out on video streaming, I will probably watch it and decide for myself.


There’s nothing remotely approaching anything to do with Q in the movie. The author is a fig who sees the dangers of the right wing everywhere he looks.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
58881 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

The very fact you keep bumping this thread clearly indicates you have no clue how you come across to the rest of this board.


He embarrasses himself in every child trafficking thread. Got destroyed in the MTV Board thread so he decided to try his hand at this one. He's not worth engaging on this topic.

ETA: Hank isn't worth engaging on any topic.
This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 3:26 pm
Posted by Corso
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2020
11771 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Sure it's relevant when the same population who promoted Q are promoting this movie. You can't ignore that overlap.


Is the same thing relevant when the Comic-Con crowd is promoting a new Star Wars movie? You're acting like it's only some small fringe group talking about this movie to try and discredit it. Trafficking is not just isolated incidents, it's happening on a global scale by global groups. Trying to dismiss it with "oh it's just the Q-tards" or it's just "right wing paranoia" is trying to minimize it's impact and its legitimacy. The reason for doing that are at the least political and at the most something more disturbing
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
58881 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Trying to dismiss it with "oh it's just the Q-tards" or it's just "right wing paranoia" is trying to minimize it's impact and its legitimacy. The reason for doing that are at the least political and at the most something more disturbing


The reality is that if only "QTards" are highlighting this issue, then maybe they aren't the problem. Maybe the people who hate "QTards" are the actual problem.

People who say things like the quote below are only making themselves look bad. They aren't making "the population who promoted Q" look bad at all.

quote:

Sure it's relevant when the same population who promoted Q are promoting this movie. You can't ignore that overlap.
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
15597 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:29 pm to
Was this a picture of the author of that idiotic article? Or of you? This thread is too unbearable to try to read back through, but either seems plausible.

Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
21536 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

My older brother is similar. Bless his heart. MBA, CPA, but his wife has to pick his clothes out for him and his kids don't allow him into family discussions. He needs to be "explained" to others.



That is a humane gesture on your part to humanize this situation. You are a good man.

I suppose I should remind myself that in real life, SFP is someone’s brother. And perhaps even someone’s significant other.

I suppose there is someone for everyone. Yet for some reason, I’m reminded of an old Andy Griffith character when thinking of that possibility:

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452479 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Got destroyed in the MTV Board thread

wut
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452479 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Is the same thing relevant when the Comic-Con crowd is promoting a new Star Wars movie?

If the Star Wars nerds ever were involved in that popular of a conspiracy theory, yes.

quote:

Trafficking is not just isolated incidents, it's happening on a global scale by global groups.

Certain trafficking happens on a "global scale', primarily labor trafficking.

A smaller subset of that is sex trafficking.

A smaller subset of that is child sex trafficking.

Almost all of this occurs outside of the US by organized crime groups.

THEN there is domestic human trafficking, which is a whole different set of populations and behaviors.

quote:

Trying to dismiss it with "oh it's just the Q-tards" or it's just "right wing paranoia" is trying to minimize it's impact and its legitimacy.

Only a very small subset of the overall picture is being dismissed (and those are specific allegations made by Qtards). This is where the dishonesty and/or obfuscation of language comes in.

You say "trafficking is a real thing" and nobody disagrees.

Then you try to say that because people say Q-based trafficking allegations don't exist, those same people are denying ALL trafficking isn't real. That's dishonest.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452479 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

The reality is that if only "QTards" are highlighting this issue, then maybe they aren't the problem.

Or that particular problem (the specific form of trafficking Qtards believe in) doesn't exist on any scale and people are begging them to look at actual trafficking.

quote:

They aren't making "the population who promoted Q" look bad at all.

People who buy into QAnon theories think this. It's called an echo chamber for a reason.

People who don't buy into QAnon theories do think those people look bad.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452479 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

I suppose I should remind myself that in real life, SFP is someone’s brother. And perhaps even someone’s significant other.

I have to laugh because I have probably met over 100 people from this site over the years and we're having a real reminiscing moment on the OT. I mean shite, I used to host the Tigerdroppings radio show

Only people like you make the above claims
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
58881 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Or that particular problem (the specific form of trafficking Qtards believe in) doesn't exist on any scale and people are begging them to look at actual trafficking.


Just to get ahead of this: don't bother giving SFP actual data. He will simply run away from the thread and still keep spouting this same lie in future threads. His sole, transparently obvious goal here is to defend child trafficking by claiming it isn't common.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452479 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

don't bother giving SFP actual data.

I'm the only person who has posted any data in this thread (or, at last post, the M/TV thread)

quote:

His sole, transparently obvious goal here is to defend child trafficking by claiming it isn't common.

I have literally stated it exists and how it exists.

LITERALLY, in my post above the one you quoted:

quote:

Certain trafficking happens on a "global scale', primarily labor trafficking.

A smaller subset of that is sex trafficking.

A smaller subset of that is child sex trafficking.

Almost all of this occurs outside of the US by organized crime groups.

THEN there is domestic human trafficking, which is a whole different set of populations and behaviors.


That's why I have to keep asking: what, specifically, are you referencing? Nobody is arguing that human trafficking doesn't exist, but people dishonestly make this claim (including you) when others state there isn't a cabal of powerful people trafficking children for sex and sacrifice rituals (a typical Qtard belief).

You can believe human trafficking, sex trafficking, child trafficking, and child sex trafficking all exist without that bullshite.
This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 4:05 pm
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 49
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 49Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram