- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump will make gay marriage federal law if SCOTUS overturns Obergefell
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:39 pm to CAD703X
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:39 pm to CAD703X
quote:
Trump made dems:
- hate taxing rich people/corporations (tariffs)
- hate locking up violent criminals
- hate the one person on the planet who actually has a profitable EV ecosystem to 'save' mother earth
- hate a law making gay marriage legal
it really is amazing to watch
So very true and another one is I read yesterday that the administration may reschedule weed to Schedule III in the coming weeks. If they do it's going to be hilarious to watch the left argue against it
0
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:40 pm to Turbeauxdog
Plenty here hate them. There is literally a thread about wanting to throw them off the roof like the Muslims do.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:41 pm to Dex Morgan
You’re making the common mistake of not supporting Obergefell and specifically the downstream consequences of it, specifically the T and Q parts of the alphabet crew, with not supporting or disliking gay people.
The two aren’t the same and you can have legitimate reasons for opposing the former while fully welcoming and providing coats for any of the maga gays. Or just being ambivalent to their existence in general
The two aren’t the same and you can have legitimate reasons for opposing the former while fully welcoming and providing coats for any of the maga gays. Or just being ambivalent to their existence in general
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:41 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
bullshite
There are maybe 120 million GOP voters makes.
"Rens" is plural, so there is no way 1/6 or more of them are gay.
God damn this fricking board is infested with morons.
outta 80 million GOP voters 30 million are FIGS! hurr durr!
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:42 pm to Dex Morgan
We love our Queers, don't we, folks? And not all of the Lesbians look like Rosie O'Donnel so let's remember to be kind to them, OK?
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:42 pm to MMauler
quote:the legal contract of marraige has to be enforced across state lines of the courts would be fubard
No he won’t. Just like abortion, it’s something that belongs in the states.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:07 pm to Dex Morgan
quote:
Or just leave marriage to the church.
It is the same as the abortion issue really. There's nothing in the constitution that addresses the issue, so it's up to the states.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:09 pm to Champagne
quote:
We love our Queers, don't we, folks? And not all of the Lesbians look like Rosie O'Donnel so let's remember to be kind to them, OK?
I have no problem with queers and even less with attractive lesbians!! Lol.
But, it's not the norm and should be dealt with as such.
As I mentioned above, it's a state issue.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:11 pm to Dex Morgan
That's gay.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:39 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
It is the same as the abortion issue really. There's nothing in the constitution that addresses the issue, so it's up to the states.
1st Amendment - “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”
This clause not only forbids the government from establishing an official religion, but also prohibits government actions that unduly favor one religion over another. It also prohibits the government from unduly preferring religion over non-religion, or non-religion over religion.
The Government is currently breaking the Constitution by providing tax benefits to “Married” people since marriage is a religious sacrament, thus, favoring religion over non-religion. The Government’s attempt to co-op the word “marriage” is also problematic. It could be argued that the Government is forcing a religious practice and terminology on what should be seen as a civil union to any non-religious citizen.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:44 pm to Dex Morgan
have zero issues with him on this
Posted on 8/12/25 at 6:16 pm to Dex Morgan
quote:
gay people
Ewww.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 8/12/25 at 6:25 pm to MMauler
quote:
No he won’t. Just like abortion, it’s something that belongs in the states.
So then you take the federal govt out of all marriages? That’s never going to happen.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 6:26 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
There should be some legal difference between marriage and a "union" between two people. Marriage is the norm and involves a man and a woman. A relationship, union, or partnership (whatever) between anything other than a man and a woman is not 5he same as marriage.
In your opinion.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 6:33 pm to MMauler
As far as states are concerned, each state would have to recognize marriage of a couple from another state in which it is legal…
Posted on 8/12/25 at 6:38 pm to Dex Morgan
Sorry Dex. Your marriage will no longer be recognized.
If Milos Y. can turn straight, so can you.
If Milos Y. can turn straight, so can you.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 6:43 pm to Rebel
Such projection. You remind me of one the Baptist preachers in the suburb I grew up in that was caught with a male prostitute in the parking lot of the Shoneys on Union Ave.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 6:44 pm to Marshhen
quote:
The Government is currently breaking the Constitution by providing tax benefits to “Married” people since marriage is a religious sacrament, thus, favoring religion over non-religion. The Government’s attempt to co-op the word “marriage” is also problematic. It could be argued that the Government is forcing a religious practice and terminology on what should be seen as a civil union to any non-religious citizen
You are incorrect.
Marriage is a cultural issue and not a religious issue. Marriage has been accepted to be between a man and a woman since the founding of our nation. The norm established as a founding principle of our nation shouldn't be changed due to a tiny percentage of folks wishing it to be so. But, since our constitution DOESN’T ADDRESS THE TOPIC OF MARRIAGE (probably cuz our founding fathers never imagined a world where sodomites would be considered part of normal society)the issue falls to each state.
You may attempt to bend this to fit your Marxist Dem ideology, but it's pretty straightforward to normal thinking folks.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 6:48 pm to ibldprplgld
quote:
quote:
There should be some legal difference between marriage and a "union" between two people. Marriage is the norm and involves a man and a woman. A relationship, union, or partnership (whatever) between anything other than a man and a woman is not 5he same as marriage.
In your opinion
It's been the opinion of many that have lived in this great country before me. Do you know why marriage isn't mentioned directly in the Constitution???? Because our founding fathers could never imagine a time that men fricking each other in the arse would be considered normal.
If you and ur rump ranger butt buddies want to behave that way, that's fine. It's your prerogative. Just stop expecting the rest of normal society to condone it as normal, cuz it's not normal. Never has been and never will be.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 6:49 pm to Dex Morgan
How about government gets out of the business of marriage in general and it just goes away?
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News