- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/25/18 at 2:48 pm to the808bass
Have you ever heard of the funding valley of death? It exists because excessive government regulations and will be one of the biggest factors holding us back from space age medicine. The cure for cancer could be pushed back 100 years because of excessive red tape.
Inform people as best you can, let them decide what they put into their bodies. Trying to protect a dying man from himself is the ultimate form of dark irony.
Inform people as best you can, let them decide what they put into their bodies. Trying to protect a dying man from himself is the ultimate form of dark irony.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 3:06 pm to the808bass
quote:
Right to try is shitty legislation. Know who loves right to try? Big pharma.
My mom who died of breast cancer did everything she could to get to whatever drugs may save her life. You can rot in hell.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 3:07 pm to flyAU
Well it’s hard to argue such a finely presented argument.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 3:09 pm to the808bass
quote:
All of this is currently available.
So why you bitching?
Posted on 5/25/18 at 3:10 pm to the808bass
Suck a dick. There’s way more value in that than your “but but but big pharma!!!” strawman
Posted on 5/25/18 at 3:12 pm to the808bass
quote:I would say "yes" if the patient has the ability to accept it and refuses to do so.
Not the argument I thought you’d make. Mainly because it’s very, very odd.
Is it a sin to refuse chemo? It would seem that it would be using the guidelines you posted.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 3:14 pm to the808bass
quote:
So you’re excited about a bill big pharma loves so that what will happen exactly?
Wrong. Pharma didn’t support this bill or lobby for it.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 3:18 pm to TuneInnTiger
I’m no fan of big pharma or Trump but it’s confusing that someone could be against this.
Just because you’re opposed to someone politically doesn’t mean you can’t toss them a tip of the cap and a
when they do something objectively positive, but I guess that’s where we are.
Just because you’re opposed to someone politically doesn’t mean you can’t toss them a tip of the cap and a
Posted on 5/25/18 at 3:21 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Ironically the party for abortion and assisted suicide is against taking drugs that might kill terminally ill patients if it has the intent to save or help them. The party of death.
Very interesting take.
Will it kill you 100%? You have that right!!!
Huh? That has a 3% chance of saving your life? Nah, gotta wait for big government to clear it for human consumption. We don't want it killing you!
This post was edited on 5/25/18 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 5/25/18 at 3:49 pm to the808bass
quote:
You’re welcome to essential oils and magnets.
You didnt answer any questions. Why do you still hate freedom?
Posted on 5/25/18 at 5:23 pm to Jbird
quote:
sidelining the FDA puts patients in danger. LINK
They're about to die anyways
It's just allowing them to throw a Hail Mary and maybe, just maybe, this will lead to future cures and advancements.
Oh and another reason US >>>>UK
Posted on 5/25/18 at 5:30 pm to TexasTiger86
No one foresees pseudo drugs/treatments being subsidized by tax dollars?
Posted on 5/25/18 at 5:34 pm to PanhandleTigah
Ideally all results recorded, so the actual side effects can be documented, as well as outcomes.
They could pay the first users to be guinea pigs, instead of overcharging.
They could pay the first users to be guinea pigs, instead of overcharging.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 5:35 pm to Jbird
quote:
terminally ill patients
quote:
puts patients in danger.
Ummmmmm
Posted on 5/26/18 at 12:57 am to the808bass
quote:
Here’s a guy who doesn’t understand medicine.
Nothing like watching another piece of shite attorney assume his lane is everything and spout off.
Wtf is your problem, bitch?
Posted on 5/26/18 at 1:04 am to the808bass
quote:
Every pharma company had a lobbyist there in support of the bill.
Bc they want to be the company to create the next useful drug. They want to make money but if it saves lives who gives a shite if the for profit business is motivated by money.
Posted on 5/26/18 at 1:48 am to Jbird
quote:
The controversial bill
I have no idea what idiots think that this would be a controversial bill... To me it is common sense, if someone is terminal than they should have the right to try new drugs that are in the testing phase if they so choose to do so or any drug for that matter. Someone who is terminal is not worried about their safety and knows it may be not be a great chance ,but why not give it a try.
Posted on 5/26/18 at 1:50 am to Jbird
Eh it's not like the fda has approved drugs that the companies knew we're terrible. Zero problems with this
Popular
Back to top


0







