- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump to sign 'right to try' bill next week
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:47 pm to the808bass
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
You contribution in content matter has been a thing of beauty in this thread.
Was your mother raped by a pharma sales rep?
OR
Did your significant other run off with a pharma sale rep?
Both?
This post was edited on 5/25/18 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:47 pm to i am dan
So you’re as dumb as jbird.
I said not even dozens would be saved. We have no way of knowing how many people will pay for a shot at the Big Pharma experimental lottery.
I said not even dozens would be saved. We have no way of knowing how many people will pay for a shot at the Big Pharma experimental lottery.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:48 pm to the808bass
quote:
the808bass
Man, you got raped in this thread.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:49 pm to The Maj
I was a pharma rep. Thanks.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:50 pm to i am dan
That’s what an idiot would say.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:50 pm to the808bass
quote:
That’s the point. Experimental drugs don’t do that as a general rule. If they do, they get approved.
You seem to have no idea how this all works. Wow, you sound dumb. Do you have any idea how long it takes to go through drug trials and how much money that costs?
Didn't think so.
This post was edited on 5/25/18 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:50 pm to the808bass
quote:
I was a pharma rep. Thanks.
Oh that explains a lot...
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:51 pm to The Maj
Solid use of ellipses. I anxiously await your next painfully obvious attempt at insult with no content.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:54 pm to the808bass
quote:
Solid use of ellipses. I anxiously await your next painfully obvious attempt at insult with no content.
Isn't that what this is?
My man, you're the kind of liberal that makes me hesitant to tell people I'm a liberal. Contribute to this thread a little with something other than a point or two followed by 15 straight posts of contrarianism. It's a bad look.
This post was edited on 5/25/18 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:55 pm to HogX
Rest easy. I’m to the right of Attila the Hun.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 1:56 pm to the808bass
quote:
That’s what an idiot would say.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 2:02 pm to PanhandleTigah
quote:
I have actually found something I agree with you on. There is hope yet
I am sure there are a lot of things that we agree on. But the way issues get framed on here, anything other than straight-down-the-line, always Trump is considered heresy.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 2:17 pm to the808bass
If you’ve ever watched someone die slowly after trying all the “legal” drugs, you might be more open to allowing them the right to choose drugs that have had some testing but haven’t passed FDA yet. They literally have nothing to lose. Some of those companies may even provide the experimental drug at low/no cost and use those patients as part of their trials.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 2:21 pm to LSUGrrrl
quote:
If you’ve ever watched someone die slowly after trying all the “legal” drugs, you might be more open to allowing them the right to choose drugs that have had some testing but haven’t passed FDA yet. They literally have nothing to lose. Some of those companies may even provide the experimental drug at low/no cost and use those patients as part of their trials.
All of this is currently available.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 2:23 pm to Jbird
If Trump opposed this bill the Dems would be all for it 
This post was edited on 5/25/18 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 5/25/18 at 2:24 pm to the808bass
quote:If a patient has the ability to go through with it, they have the responsibility to try to in my worldview. The only acceptable way to deny the prolonging of life is to sacrifice your life for someone else.
What if
A) the treatment is $3T
B) the result isn’t curative but only prolongs life by 30 days
And C) the patient is in so much pain for those 30 days that they will Be basically non-functioning?
Posted on 5/25/18 at 2:26 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
If a patient has the ability to go through with it, they have the responsibility to try to in my worldview.
Not the argument I thought you’d make. Mainly because it’s very, very odd.
Is it a sin to refuse chemo? It would seem that it would be using the guidelines you posted.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 2:32 pm to the808bass
quote:
I was a pharma rep
There’s the source of butthurt.
Why not let people live freely instead of the FDA arresting homeopathic doctors for trying to help terminally ill people? They can choose NOT to pursue the options but why not the feeedom to choose? Isnt that what the left claims about a womens body? Why not everyone?
Posted on 5/25/18 at 2:35 pm to rattlebucket
That’s a totally separate issue. You’re welcome to essential oils and magnets.
Posted on 5/25/18 at 2:39 pm to Jbird
quote:
backlash from House Democrats and patient safety organizations, who worry sidelining the FDA puts patients in danger.
Dems are stupid and have no idea what the term terminally means.
Popular
Back to top



1







