- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:19 pm to roadGator
quote:
It was mostly dumb own goal stuff. He opened the door for Leticia.
She happily walked through it.
Yeah, but that's like arresting someone for going 10 mph over the speed limit in, say, Atlanta—where you have to drive 10 mph over the speed limit or you'll get run over, so everyone does it—and charging them with attempted murder.
I agree with you that he did what they say he did.
But the response to it is still malicious and discriminatory political prosecution.
The remedy for this is to either not have laws on the books that you don't uniformly enforce, or get them off the books.
This post was edited on 3/22/24 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:20 pm to roadGator
quote:
He didn’t tell it like it is on some real estate documents related to some loans.
The bank who lent him the money disagreed. Only partisan hacks that know precisely frick-all about real estate finance think this was a crime because OMB.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:22 pm to Tantal
roadGator ,what a dummy
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:24 pm to reddy tiger
quote:
You obviously live in a fantasy world of your own ignorance and bias.
Did you notice that the guy you're talking to moves his lips every time you do?
You're talking to the guy in the mirror, moron.
Even most Democrats admit that Biden is the worst POTUS in at least 100 years.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:26 pm to Tantal
Yes. He was targeted. But he did lie on some loan docs. He made it easier for her.
Is that controversial?
Is that controversial?
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:35 pm to roadGator
quote:
So there is no evidence that he said an unfinished property value was the value to its finished value?
And then you said....
quote:
He did these things or someone in the organization did
So you're telling me to believe that he did something, but then telling me a few words later that maybe someone else did something and he didn't.
quote:
Did you read all the examples of fraud she popped him on?
Did you proofread your post before you hit submit? It contained a strong example of contradiction that I would've thought would be easy to spot and correct.
And aside from that, we were only discussing the one specific example that you presented for rebuttal. If the conversation is to be expanded to include evidence outside of the specific subject matter, that's fine, but it should be made clear instead of contemporaneously drifting to loosely relevant subject matter or, as we say, deflecting.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:38 pm to TigerAxeOK
He did it or someone else did it in the organization. He’s being held responsible.
That’s not my doing. Your beef isn’t with me.
I have nothing to do with what was on those documents. I would have suggested that they not contain false info.
That’s not my doing. Your beef isn’t with me.
I have nothing to do with what was on those documents. I would have suggested that they not contain false info.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:40 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Even most Democrats admit that Biden is the worst POTUS in at least 100 years.
Lol what? Where do you get this ridiculousness?
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:48 pm to roadGator
quote:
He didn’t tell it like it is on some real estate documents related to some loans.
That’s part of the reason he got in trouble.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:50 pm to roadGator
His lenders say different, skippy.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:51 pm to VoxDawg
So the false information was not part of the reason she was able to pop him?
Thats an interesting stance.
Thats an interesting stance.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:52 pm to roadGator
Both parties involved agreed to the terms. No one was defrauded. The bank got their money, plus interest paid on terms of the loan.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:54 pm to reddy tiger
quote:
Everyone who has critically examined the evidence disagrees with you. You should be ashamed of your cultish behavior.
No they haven't. That is just stupid to say.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:56 pm to roadGator
quote:
I know truth is hard to deal with.
Next time you should stick to the truth. Your post was completely dumb and the fact that you agree with this makes you a fig.
Don't be mad at me, be mad at your dad for not pulling out. We are.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 2:04 pm to VoxDawg
So no laws were broken?
This should be overturned quickly then. No worries.
This should be overturned quickly then. No worries.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 2:07 pm to DotBling
The truth is there for you. You are mad at something neither you are I did.
I am curious what you find to be untrue. We can have a discussion about the facts of the case. That's healthy debate. But we must agree on the facts.
If you can't agree that lies/fibs were told then just keep hurling personal attacks my way. It's really all you can do and is totally expected.
I am curious what you find to be untrue. We can have a discussion about the facts of the case. That's healthy debate. But we must agree on the facts.
If you can't agree that lies/fibs were told then just keep hurling personal attacks my way. It's really all you can do and is totally expected.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 2:11 pm to roadGator
There's a dozen reasons it will be appealed. I can't speak for everyone, but I'm not sweating it for a second.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 2:19 pm to roadGator
quote:
Agreed. If they knew he was misrepresenting some properties they didn’t care. If they didn’t know that’s on them. Either way, they got their money back and were fi
Banks always care that is why they do their own appraisal and the loan is based off that. Trump could say his stuff is worth 10 trillion and it does not matter. Loans are ALWAYS done on the banks appraisals period. I could go to the bank and say my left testicle is worth millions and I want to borrow against it. The bank would do their own appraisal and say that nut is worth a quarter and we will loan on that value.
This post was edited on 3/22/24 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 3/22/24 at 2:30 pm to Warboo
quote:
Trump could say his stuff is worth 10 trillion and it does not matter.
Sure. If it were just that.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News