- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Pardons Tina Peters
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:34 pm to Ailsa
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:34 pm to Ailsa
Full statement:
"Colorado Governor is attempting to sell everyone that there is no legal means for the federal government to take custody of Tina Peters. ??
My response to him below??
Yes. The State has this case in its jurisdiction. Adjudicated and sentence carried out in the same state.
However Governor;
Ms Peters identified voter fraud. Putting her in jail for what amounts to a prosecutorial snow job, only remains in your jurisdiction IF said prisoner is not a whistleblower. The Federal government can and has taken into their custody said prisoner and placed them under the Marshall Service until testimony is fully given.
The law below lays out exactly what Lawful code would or could be used to relieve a prisoner from States jurisdiction.
You're a Governor and you didn't know this?
?? Read and comprehend Sir, the gig is up. Better lawyer up.
9-21.010 - Introduction
The purpose of this chapter is to provide information and guidance to Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys with respect to the Witness Security Reform Act of 1984, Part F of Chapter XII of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 (Pub.L. No. 98-473). This chapter contains regulations and provides general information about the Witness Security Program (the Program), and sets forth the procedures by which a government attorney may apply for the services of the Program in order to protect a witness against dangers that may be related to the witness's testimony. This chapter also provides information concerning the investigative use, or targeting, of persons who are in the custody of the United States Marshals Service (USMS) or the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), or who are under BOP supervision.
For information concerning the Emergency Witness Assistance Program see JM 3-7.340, or contact any USAO Victim-Witness Coordinator or the Executive Office for United States Attorneys' LECC/Victim-Witness Office."
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-21000-witness-security
"Colorado Governor is attempting to sell everyone that there is no legal means for the federal government to take custody of Tina Peters. ??
My response to him below??
Yes. The State has this case in its jurisdiction. Adjudicated and sentence carried out in the same state.
However Governor;
Ms Peters identified voter fraud. Putting her in jail for what amounts to a prosecutorial snow job, only remains in your jurisdiction IF said prisoner is not a whistleblower. The Federal government can and has taken into their custody said prisoner and placed them under the Marshall Service until testimony is fully given.
The law below lays out exactly what Lawful code would or could be used to relieve a prisoner from States jurisdiction.
You're a Governor and you didn't know this?
?? Read and comprehend Sir, the gig is up. Better lawyer up.
9-21.010 - Introduction
The purpose of this chapter is to provide information and guidance to Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys with respect to the Witness Security Reform Act of 1984, Part F of Chapter XII of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 (Pub.L. No. 98-473). This chapter contains regulations and provides general information about the Witness Security Program (the Program), and sets forth the procedures by which a government attorney may apply for the services of the Program in order to protect a witness against dangers that may be related to the witness's testimony. This chapter also provides information concerning the investigative use, or targeting, of persons who are in the custody of the United States Marshals Service (USMS) or the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), or who are under BOP supervision.
For information concerning the Emergency Witness Assistance Program see JM 3-7.340, or contact any USAO Victim-Witness Coordinator or the Executive Office for United States Attorneys' LECC/Victim-Witness Office."
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-21000-witness-security
4
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:39 pm to Ailsa
Thanks for posting. Again, novel approach.
Better chance of prevailing than the pardon argument.
Better chance of prevailing than the pardon argument.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:45 pm to Ailsa
Wait. Texrider told me last night that there isn't a smidgeon of voter fraud evidence.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:46 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Texrider told me last night that there isn't a smidgeon of voter fraud evidence.
The Tina Peters prosecution does not involve actual evidence of voter fraud
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Tina Peters prosecution does not involve actual evidence of voter fraud
The US DOJ thinks it does.
quote:
Ms Peters identified voter fraud. Putting her in jail for what amounts to a prosecutorial snow job, only remains in your jurisdiction IF said prisoner is not a whistleblower. The Federal government can and has taken into their custody said prisoner and placed them under the Marshall Service until testimony is fully given.
Btw I'm not going down your mental masturbation trip. This is my only and last response to your dumbass.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:57 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
The US DOJ thinks it does.
You mean Pamela Olson?
quote:
Btw I'm not going down your mental masturbation trip.
We all know you can't defend your claims, so that's not shocking
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If we're discussing legal issues, then the legalities will matter.
The degree to which legalities don’t align with the truth show the disastrous flaws of our legal system.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:20 pm to Ailsa
They're going to have to rent out an ICU room for Hank, 4Tubbies, SlowBro, and Roger when Tina gets busted out.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:44 pm to moneyg
quote:
The degree to which legalities don’t align with the truth show the disastrous flaws of our legal system.
Then there are no flaws with this Tina Peters story because the conviction aligns with the truth
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:47 pm to Dex Morgan
quote:
They're going to have to rent out an ICU room for Hank, 4Tubbies, SlowBro, and Roger when Tina gets busted out.
Because of the erosion of states rights?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:52 pm to dukkbill
quote:
which seems disproportionate to any offense. That isn't the rule of law prevailing. That is a single judge being vindictive for a political purpose. This isn't about the legality of any action, its about the system's potential for abuse for political purposes.
Goose-steppers see that abuse as a positive, not an issue.
Then again, it’s the same party that has targeted the black population for the past few hundred years.
The far left (and its foot soldiers) = vile (and violent).
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:21 pm to Judnnc
quote:
Judnnc
You need to settle down.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:37 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Ms Peters identified voter fraud. Putting her in jail for what amounts to a prosecutorial snow job, only remains in your jurisdiction IF said prisoner is not a whistleblower. The Federal government can and has taken into their custody said prisoner and placed them under the Marshall Service until testimony is fully given.
Roger Stone floated this idea on his show tonight. Whistle blower and material witness both may help. She hit a nerve to get such an extreme response from those she sought to expose. It's the kind of thing leftist do to their opponents. It's like she was sent to a gulag.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:29 am to Auburn1968
quote:
"I believe that the whole Tina Peter circus/fiasco is coming to a head, and I mean on the near-event horizon.
From where I'm sitting, it's palpable.
The timing of it all is entirely intriguing... including the liklihood the matter would likely then accerate to the Supreme Court in short order.
Were that to happen, and the SCOTUS rules in Trump's favor, the implications would be YUGE.
This has the real potential to end up being much more explosive and significant than would appear to be the case. And would expand and further embolden the plenary powers of the Presidency.
And that's significant because if, as many believe, the 2020 was stolen (it was), and all of that is close to (finally) coming out, which, for the record, Trump literally just said was about to occur just a few days ago, then this entire situation with Tina seems not only rather important, but being rather timely.
Her data and testimony could well be the key that unravels all of it. Which would also help explain why Colorado seems hellbent on going obverboard on punishing her to the degree they have.
Note that Trump just dropped that pardon for her. Which, as things stand, doesn't apply to state charges. But her case might change all the math."
https://xcancel.com/AwakenedOutlaw/status/1999686349809680857
"I believe that the whole Tina Peter circus/fiasco is coming to a head, and I mean on the near-event horizon.
From where I'm sitting, it's palpable.
The timing of it all is entirely intriguing... including the liklihood the matter would likely then accerate to the Supreme Court in short order.
Were that to happen, and the SCOTUS rules in Trump's favor, the implications would be YUGE.
This has the real potential to end up being much more explosive and significant than would appear to be the case. And would expand and further embolden the plenary powers of the Presidency.
And that's significant because if, as many believe, the 2020 was stolen (it was), and all of that is close to (finally) coming out, which, for the record, Trump literally just said was about to occur just a few days ago, then this entire situation with Tina seems not only rather important, but being rather timely.
Her data and testimony could well be the key that unravels all of it. Which would also help explain why Colorado seems hellbent on going obverboard on punishing her to the degree they have.
Note that Trump just dropped that pardon for her. Which, as things stand, doesn't apply to state charges. But her case might change all the math."
https://xcancel.com/AwakenedOutlaw/status/1999686349809680857
Page 15 of 15
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News