- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Trump Needs an EO Banning Transitioning Kids on Day One
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:01 pm
The UK already bans these treatments for minors, we should follow suit.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:05 pm to SingleMalt1973
Yes, and go full Order 66 on these pediatric gender clinics. Do it simultaneously at noon Mountain Standard Time on January 20th (least populous time zone and that’s lunchtime for them) and arrest everyone that works at those clinics immediately. And if you arrest them all when they’re at work it’s less cockroaches that can scatter and we can hunt down the ones that took PTO or are out much easier.
This post was edited on 11/12/24 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:08 pm to SingleMalt1973
I think already said that was his plan...?????
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:14 pm to SingleMalt1973
He's not a king, as disgusting as I find the acts, he needs to work with congress to put laws in place.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:34 pm to SingleMalt1973
EOs only control executive agencies.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:38 pm to SingleMalt1973
No sir! This is for state governments to decide. Feds need to stay out of it, and stick to what the constitution allows.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:39 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
He's not a king, as disgusting as I find the acts, he needs to work with congress to put laws in place.
frick that.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:39 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
He's not a king, as disgusting as I find the acts, he needs to work with congress to put laws in place.
I agree but he can cut funding without being "king"... while he waits on Congress to act...
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:40 pm to Penrod
quote:
Feds need to stay out of it, and stick to what the constitution allows.
And frick you.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:40 pm to SingleMalt1973
quote:
The UK already bans these treatments for minors, we should follow suit.
Its already banned in most states.
Louisiana has a law where there can be no non-reversible treatment for minors
quote:
Louisiana, where the ban is scheduled to go into effect Jan. 1, 2024, will join 20 other states that have enacted laws restricting or banning gender-affirming medical care, which includes puberty-blockers, hormone treatment and gender reassignment surgery.
This post was edited on 11/12/24 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:41 pm to SingleMalt1973
quote:
EO
No, we need to stop Presidents ruling by EO.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:808 says to frick you.
No, we need to stop Presidents ruling by EO.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:44 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
808 says to frick you.
Maybe one day these dweebs will learn they are going used against us, not for us.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:45 pm to SingleMalt1973
He needs to be veeerrrryyyyyy selective on EO’s and consider waiting for legislation. He needs to realize that the left will campaign on him being an authoritarian and to give them as little firepower as possible so we don’t frick it up for Vance. Otherwise all this shite is going to just go away in 4 years.
How many transitions are actually being performed? The bad optics should not outweigh the benefits. Being “in the right” for the short term is less important than “do we want 2029 to be run by democrats and everything just reversed”
How many transitions are actually being performed? The bad optics should not outweigh the benefits. Being “in the right” for the short term is less important than “do we want 2029 to be run by democrats and everything just reversed”
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Naw. If there’s medical Lysenkoism going on (and that’s exactly what this is). And medical organizations are using Federal funds (and they are) to criminally maim minors (and that’s what’s happening), then a temporary EO is perfectly defensible while also starting legislation to buttress the EO.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:49 pm to the808bass
quote:
If there’s medical Lysenkoism going on
Well, the next elected Democrat will just reverse it, and give his own EOs that allow child mutilation.
Thats exactly how it will work. Right now we're still undoing and redoing Obama's EOs.
This post was edited on 11/12/24 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:50 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Maybe one day these dweebs will learn they are going used against us, not for us.
Roger doesn’t give a frick about a couple thousand kids being sterilized in the meanwhile.
Republicanism!!
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Well, the next elected Democrat will just reverse it, and give his own EOs that allow child mutilation.
It would help you to read my entire post.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:51 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
Its already banned in most states.
Hospitals are still performing it even where it’s banned.
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:52 pm to the808bass
quote:
Roger doesn’t give a frick about a couple thousand kids being sterilized in the meanwhile.
No, I realize EOs are worthless after 4 years.
All youre advocating is EO wars.
Popular
Back to top


8





