Started By
Message
locked post

Trump Needs an EO Banning Transitioning Kids on Day One

Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:01 pm
Posted by SingleMalt1973
Member since Feb 2022
24276 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:01 pm
The UK already bans these treatments for minors, we should follow suit.

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:05 pm to
Yes, and go full Order 66 on these pediatric gender clinics. Do it simultaneously at noon Mountain Standard Time on January 20th (least populous time zone and that’s lunchtime for them) and arrest everyone that works at those clinics immediately. And if you arrest them all when they’re at work it’s less cockroaches that can scatter and we can hunt down the ones that took PTO or are out much easier.

This post was edited on 11/12/24 at 12:07 pm
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23663 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:08 pm to
I think already said that was his plan...?????
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:14 pm to
He's not a king, as disgusting as I find the acts, he needs to work with congress to put laws in place.
Posted by Tmo Sabe
GA
Member since Mar 2022
978 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:34 pm to
EOs only control executive agencies.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55367 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:38 pm to
No sir! This is for state governments to decide. Feds need to stay out of it, and stick to what the constitution allows.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128760 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

He's not a king, as disgusting as I find the acts, he needs to work with congress to put laws in place.


frick that.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30551 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

He's not a king, as disgusting as I find the acts, he needs to work with congress to put laws in place.


I agree but he can cut funding without being "king"... while he waits on Congress to act...
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128760 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Feds need to stay out of it, and stick to what the constitution allows.


And frick you.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

The UK already bans these treatments for minors, we should follow suit.

Its already banned in most states.

Louisiana has a law where there can be no non-reversible treatment for minors
quote:



Louisiana, where the ban is scheduled to go into effect Jan. 1, 2024, will join 20 other states that have enacted laws restricting or banning gender-affirming medical care, which includes puberty-blockers, hormone treatment and gender reassignment surgery.
This post was edited on 11/12/24 at 12:42 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298561 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

EO


No, we need to stop Presidents ruling by EO.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39833 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:42 pm to
quote:


No, we need to stop Presidents ruling by EO.
808 says to frick you.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298561 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

808 says to frick you.


Maybe one day these dweebs will learn they are going used against us, not for us.

Posted by TN Tygah
Member since Nov 2023
7837 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:45 pm to
He needs to be veeerrrryyyyyy selective on EO’s and consider waiting for legislation. He needs to realize that the left will campaign on him being an authoritarian and to give them as little firepower as possible so we don’t frick it up for Vance. Otherwise all this shite is going to just go away in 4 years.

How many transitions are actually being performed? The bad optics should not outweigh the benefits. Being “in the right” for the short term is less important than “do we want 2029 to be run by democrats and everything just reversed”
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128760 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:48 pm to
Naw. If there’s medical Lysenkoism going on (and that’s exactly what this is). And medical organizations are using Federal funds (and they are) to criminally maim minors (and that’s what’s happening), then a temporary EO is perfectly defensible while also starting legislation to buttress the EO.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298561 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

If there’s medical Lysenkoism going on


Well, the next elected Democrat will just reverse it, and give his own EOs that allow child mutilation.

Thats exactly how it will work. Right now we're still undoing and redoing Obama's EOs.

This post was edited on 11/12/24 at 12:51 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128760 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Maybe one day these dweebs will learn they are going used against us, not for us.


Roger doesn’t give a frick about a couple thousand kids being sterilized in the meanwhile.

Republicanism!!
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128760 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Well, the next elected Democrat will just reverse it, and give his own EOs that allow child mutilation.


It would help you to read my entire post.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128760 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Its already banned in most states.


Hospitals are still performing it even where it’s banned.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298561 posts
Posted on 11/12/24 at 12:52 pm to
quote:


Roger doesn’t give a frick about a couple thousand kids being sterilized in the meanwhile.


No, I realize EOs are worthless after 4 years.

All youre advocating is EO wars.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram