- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:17 am to a want
quote:
awant
You are very fake news
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:21 am to a want
Disgraceful that an honest man wouldn't be concerned by who was imolicated by evidence of corruption?
Typical liberal.
Typical liberal.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:21 am to a want
quote:
Shouldn’t the Commander in Chief actually read a document the FBI says could do damage to our national security before deciding to release it?
I don’t know, shouldn’t Pelosi and other Dems have read the affordable health care act before passing it?
Everyone is full of chit and self serving. It’s time to drain the swamp.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:21 am to a want
quote:
Trump made decision to release memo before reading it
That's alright, most of the people opposing releasing the memo made their decisions to oppose releasing it without reading it either. So it's all good.
Some moron on Laura Ingraham's show last night said, if I remember correctly, that he hadn't read it, because if he had read it, then he couldn't talk about why it shouldn't be released. That's some good logic right there.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:27 am to a want
This illustrates the media’s bias and ignorance. The process is this:
intelligence info is segmented and not connected.
Congress has elected to release information.
The executive branch gets the info to review.
The executive can redact, edit or reject the release. If reject, the entire House would vote.
The President can also do nothing. And the intelligence would be released on day 5. So, Trump can’t decide before to release. He’s just saying he’s ok with HIC decision and will release as is.
intelligence info is segmented and not connected.
Congress has elected to release information.
The executive branch gets the info to review.
The executive can redact, edit or reject the release. If reject, the entire House would vote.
The President can also do nothing. And the intelligence would be released on day 5. So, Trump can’t decide before to release. He’s just saying he’s ok with HIC decision and will release as is.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:30 am to a want
quote:
P.S. You apparently based your reality on emotional highs and lows. Typical!
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:30 am to a want
A Fool.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:34 am to Lsupimp
after my question-post and then sharp retort on the previous page, he's more like a ghost
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:35 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
You are better than this.
Negative
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:37 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
So, before it was on his desk (therefore, before he could possibly read it) he is “convinced “ that he trusts his party’s leaders on that committee. It says NOTHING about his ability to change his mind after he actually had a chance to read it.
He decided to release it before reading it because he thinks it will discredit the Russia investigation. It was reported yesterday. He said he thought this story would damage Mueller's investigation.
His own DOJ (led by republicans) say the memo is misleading and overly partisan. The FBI (led by a republican appointed by Trump) says it could reveal sources and methods and that it could damage national security.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:40 am to a want
quote:
do damage to our national security
exposing corruption is damaging to CREDIBILITY, not security amigo.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:40 am to a want
quote:
Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive!
Yes indeed
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:41 am to a want
quote:
His own DOJ (led by republicans) say the memo is misleading and overly partisan. The FBI (led by a republican appointed by Trump) says it could reveal sources and methods and that it could damage national security.
the assumption here is that their alleged partisanship outweighs their allegiance to government
*ETA: and i addressed the "Sources and methods" issue last page, before BHPs post
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 7:42 am
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:41 am to a want
Haha
DOJ and FBI says it’s wrong?
Gawddamn, lets take a poll in prisons and ask those bad actors if the evidence was wrong, too.
Why do you really object? I am unafraid of a Fed police force having to work a little more in the sunshine.
You cannot be scared that a nothing memo might be read by the citizens. So, I’m left to assume that you do not want a SOMETHING memo to be available.
Wow.
DOJ and FBI says it’s wrong?
Gawddamn, lets take a poll in prisons and ask those bad actors if the evidence was wrong, too.
Why do you really object? I am unafraid of a Fed police force having to work a little more in the sunshine.
You cannot be scared that a nothing memo might be read by the citizens. So, I’m left to assume that you do not want a SOMETHING memo to be available.
Wow.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:43 am to monsterballads
Trying to oust the sitting president has no bearing on national security. Leaking information from sources has no bearing on national security. Breaching classified correspondence has no bearing on national security. carry on.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:43 am to a want
quote:
He said he thought this story would damage Mueller's investigation.
Link to that quote?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:44 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
I am unafraid of a Fed police force having to work a little more in the sunshine.
i have no idea why this is so controversial
especially to the left, of all groups
"national security" is the hallmark argument of the right
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it's very likely this memo just talks about how the FBI used a DEM-funded oppo research memo to get a FISA warrant
assuming that's true, why do we want to protect anyone involved?
assuming that's true, why would we want to protect those methods?
I don't care about it revealing people who committed a crime. I don't think there was a crime - and I think you guys have yet again fallen for a conspiracy theory. I just want to protect sources (spies) who are responsible for collecting intel ..... or are they a part of the deep state too?
I hope the memo comes out (redacting where necessary). It was reported yesterday that many republicans think it will be a dud. A "bombshell" about extending surveillance on Carter Paige is a dud. This will make Nunes and Trump look even worse.
Trump feel the noose tightening. He's trying to muddy the waters. That's all this is about.
Also: Sorry about the slow response. Evidently I'm the only one scheduled for this shift this morning.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:44 am to a want
You are too stupid to even acknowledge that piece of “journalism” is a joke.
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News