Started By
Message

re: TRUMP FULLY ACQUITTED

Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:39 pm to
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70913 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:39 pm to
Bolton wasn't issued a subpoena after the rule was voted in.

That's all anyone really cares about in this answer. Sorry, Schiff, nobody is listening anymore.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42020 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:39 pm to
Rand Paul has more integrity in a finger than the entire Supreme Court, especially that cuck Roberts.
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
23000 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Wtf/. Why do we keep harping on subpoenas... the Dems didn’t want to go to court over it, plain and simple.


Because the Dems got destroyed on that issue yesterday so they are trying to salvage something. Also, Schiff isn't answering the question at all.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45871 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Because the Dems got destroyed on that issue yesterday so they are trying to salvage something. Also, Schiff isn't answering the question at all.


That wasn't a softball from Jones. He wanted facts. And schiff ignored him.

Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59118 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Oh shite that question from Jones...


And the totality of Schiff's address is "we're looking for that information now indulge me while I talk about other stuff and completely not answer the question".

I hope the next question is "To the House Managers, so is your answer to Senator Jones' question that there were no subpoenas issued after the Resolution?"

Or at least "To the President's lawyers, since Chairman Schiff did not directly answer the previous question, can you do so?"
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Oh shite that question from Jones...





What was it?
Posted by TurkeyBaconLeg
Member since Jul 2018
2035 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:41 pm to
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:42 pm to
Someone should submit "Does Mr. Schiff plan on answering any questions today or is he going to keep rambling like a little bitch?" as a question
This post was edited on 1/30/20 at 12:44 pm
Posted by TigerTailsSoup
Member since Sep 2005
10857 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:42 pm to
womp womp
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
23000 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:42 pm to
What a waste of 5 minutes. We couldn't reissue the subpoenas because to reissue subpoenas would be to kill legislative oversight. What?
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45871 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

What was it?


He wanted to know what HR or other House Rules authorized the subpoenas prior to the full House vote on HR660, and who was subpoenaed after the HR.

Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
41990 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:43 pm to
Pam
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

He wanted to know what HR or other House Rules authorized the subpoenas prior to the full House vote on HR660, and who was subpoenaed after the HR.



saucy Jones
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42020 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:43 pm to
Rand should ask Justice Roberts what the NSA had on him when he voted against repealing the ACA and what they still have on him to prevent a Senator from asking a relevant question in an impeachment proceeding.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
166703 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:43 pm to
I wish someone would ask Rand's question. It does not fricking name the whistle blower.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59118 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:44 pm to
Cruz question... To both sides: Yesterday Manager Demmings refused to answer about Burisma, Joe and Hunter.

quote:

Why do Hunter and Joe Biden's stories conflict and did anyone in the House ask that question?


Boom!!
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
19563 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Senator Rand Paul@RandPaul 5m My exact question was: Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together 1/2] and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings. 2/2


The name should be made public by the WH council within an answer to a question. Nothing unethical or illegal about that.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
166703 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:44 pm to
Pammy Poo up. You go Pammy!
Posted by TigerTailsSoup
Member since Sep 2005
10857 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:44 pm to
now we're talking about Biden
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55648 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

when men go that bald I think they should rogaine or shave it all off.


That's very hurtful....
first pageprev pagePage 114 of 214Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram