- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:19 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:
“It is pretty terrifying.”
Belt tightening is something all federal agencies should get used to. It's not terrifying it's reality.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:22 pm to Dale51
quote:
Where does it say the 20% come off of research? Trim the fat.
That was another answer from Mulkavey.
The money is to be allocated to the Directors of the departments. The WH is NOT micro-managing how the funds are used within each department.
Just a bunch of whining over fiscal responsibility from the left going on. If the budget cut corn subsidies by 20% they'd claim POTUS was trying to starve the entire world.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:22 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
oh NIH does vaccines?
He does most of the vaccines. I read that he started a vaccine shop back in the day when he and Lonald Vertage-Schwitzer were back at university. It was almost a "Tony Stark" kinda thing...huge advancements with basic tools.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:23 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:
the acceleration in drug discoveries disease treatemtn will slow down tremendously.
What are you basing that claim on?
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:39 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:
Are you slow?
You will have research, the acceleration in drug discoveries disease treatemtn will slow down tremendously. 20% cut means no new grant funding. This is barely enough to keep old grants going.
You seem to think that the federal government not paying legal fees for private citizens meant that people wouldn't have access to legal services.....so naturally I assumed that you'd think that a 20% cut to NIH would mean the END OF MANKIND AS WE KNOW IT.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:40 pm to Dale51
quote:
He does most of the vaccines. I read that he started a vaccine shop back in the day when he and Lonald Vertage-Schwitzer were back at university. It was almost a "Tony Stark" kinda thing...huge advancements with basic tools.
is it also true that his avatar pic is actually him though
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:18 pm to Northwestern tiger
Do you think the nih doesn't waste at least 20% of their budget? It's probably higher. Stop being a hysterical little snowflake bitch.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:34 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:If you would just be honest when you post a thread maybe, just maybe, other posters might have more respect for you.
Now he is slashing Biomedical Research by 20%.
Your own link says it is an 18% cut, not 20%, and the cut is for all of NIH funding, not just biomedical research funding.
As your own links explains much of the reduced funding is from consolidating the 27 (27!!!!) locations and institutes of the NIH and by reducing the funding for training people FROM OTHER COUNTRIES (!!!!) on how to do research. So research is not being cut on that part, just teaching citizens of other countries HOW TO DO RESEARCH.
Why can't those countries PAY the NIH for the training their people are receiving?
quote:Try being truthful for a change.
The Trump administration is not the first to propose an NIH reorganization—in the late 1990s, former NIH Director Harold Varmus decried its sprawling array of disease-oriented institutes and called for a more streamlined structure.
This post was edited on 3/17/17 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 3/17/17 at 2:07 pm to LSURussian
Most people in research will agree that the NIH could stand some shakeup and reorganization. With that, a $6 billion cut will absolutely affect biomedical research funding. The NIH had to cut 5% or 1.5 billion in 2013. It absolutely had an affect on funding. FYI, in their 2016FY report $130 million was spent on buildings.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 2:12 pm to tedmarkuson
It's like some of you never heard of negotiating.
This is right up Trump's alley. Ask for way more than you are willing to settle for , and get way more than the other side was originally wanting to give up.
That is in fact the entire point of a negotiation, neither side leaves completely happy nor completely unhappy
This is right up Trump's alley. Ask for way more than you are willing to settle for , and get way more than the other side was originally wanting to give up.
That is in fact the entire point of a negotiation, neither side leaves completely happy nor completely unhappy
Posted on 3/17/17 at 2:13 pm to LSURussian
quote:
by reducing the funding for training people FROM OTHER COUNTRIES (!!!!) on how to do research. So research is not being cut on that part, just teaching citizens of other countries HOW TO DO RESEARCH.
My cousin actually does this for a living. She even tells us that much of what she does should be being taught at the university level. People are coming in from other countries with "college degrees" from their home countries and still don't know how to perform basic research in their own field. She even admits that it's a bullshite job.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 3:14 pm to Northwestern tiger
Let's just add another 10 trillion to the national debt like Barry did!!! ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbirdtongue.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbirdtongue.gif)
Posted on 3/17/17 at 3:29 pm to Lou Pai
WashPo article
The federal government spent millions of dollars in recent years researching why lesbians have a higher obesity rate than heterosexual women and gay men, according to funding records.
The federal government spent millions of dollars in recent years researching why lesbians have a higher obesity rate than heterosexual women and gay men, according to funding records.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 3:45 pm to Northwestern tiger
So, they have to learn how to budget like every working class American household not supported by the federal government?
Posted on 3/18/17 at 1:38 pm to tiderider
quote:
The federal government spent millions of dollars in recent years researching why lesbians have a higher obesity rate than heterosexual women and gay men, according to funding records.
This is pathetic.
Posted on 3/18/17 at 1:43 pm to Northwestern tiger
Who needs it. It's just a bunch of leftist doctors wasting grant money on abortion research! Amirite!?!
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)